RE: Another day, another "small" mass shooting (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


WhoreMods -> RE: Another day, another "small" mass shooting (11/15/2017 1:40:17 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

its really not an answer to my point.

no one is suggesting ignoring means of murder or mass murder. im not making an either/or proposition.

im suggesting that since the left makes so much fuss about guns in particular when it comes to murder, when there are so many other ways that they don't fuss over, that something else is likely going on as concerns guns.



How many times have you seen the gun grabbers on here argue that the
.223 is more powerful than a 30-06 0r .308 and for that reason alone
should be banned. They argue from a position of ignorance.

I've not.
I have, on the other hand, seen you repeatedly insist that they are, while failing to back this claim up. A cynic would probably feel that this is what they call a strawman argument.




BamaD -> RE: Another day, another "small" mass shooting (11/15/2017 1:48:58 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

its really not an answer to my point.

no one is suggesting ignoring means of murder or mass murder. im not making an either/or proposition.

im suggesting that since the left makes so much fuss about guns in particular when it comes to murder, when there are so many other ways that they don't fuss over, that something else is likely going on as concerns guns.



How many times have you seen the gun grabbers on here argue that the
.223 is more powerful than a 30-06 0r .308 and for that reason alone
should be banned. They argue from a position of ignorance.

I've not.
I have, on the other hand, seen you repeatedly insist that they are, while failing to back this claim up. A cynic would probably feel that this is what they call a strawman argument.

Them or a person who doesn't pay attention.
How many times have you seen that if you can do something with a "06
"
then there I no need for a person to have something as powerful as an AR-15.




PeonForHer -> RE: Another day, another "small" mass shooting (11/15/2017 1:49:46 PM)

quote:



How many times have you seen the gun grabbers on here argue that the
.223 is more powerful than a 30-06 0r .308


About as many times as I've seen gunsters here argue that Christmas shopping in Oxford Street is better than it is at Camden Market.




WhoreMods -> RE: Another day, another "small" mass shooting (11/15/2017 1:55:55 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

its really not an answer to my point.

no one is suggesting ignoring means of murder or mass murder. im not making an either/or proposition.

im suggesting that since the left makes so much fuss about guns in particular when it comes to murder, when there are so many other ways that they don't fuss over, that something else is likely going on as concerns guns.



How many times have you seen the gun grabbers on here argue that the
.223 is more powerful than a 30-06 0r .308 and for that reason alone
should be banned. They argue from a position of ignorance.

I've not.
I have, on the other hand, seen you repeatedly insist that they are, while failing to back this claim up. A cynic would probably feel that this is what they call a strawman argument.

Them or a person who doesn't pay attention.
How many times have you seen that if you can do something with a "06
"
then there I no need for a person to have something as powerful as an AR-15.

Who on here has made the argument that you're attributing to the evil gun grabbers?
If you can't find something to support your allegation, why are you lying?




JVoV -> RE: Another day, another "small" mass shooting (11/15/2017 1:57:57 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Let's break this down for those who insist guns are the problem:

In January the man was arrested on suspicion of assault with a deadly weapon

Gee, why the hell didnt the cops seize his guns then? In a case like this, it would be standard procedure in most jurisdictions....

Johnston added that the woman had a restraining order against the shooter.

Again, with this, local law enforcement are responsible under federal law to remove guns from the possession of the person, since under federal law, the shooter could not legally possess firearms in the first place.


But hey, its not the fault of the police for not enforcing the damn laws, not their job....

Nope, its the fault of the people who own guns, support gun ownership yadda yadda yadda yadda.

I love it, the cops and local authority fucked up and did not take his guns (which is what you people want) and you still blame the fact that people can buy guns?


From the ATF website, the people who cannot legally possess firearms, again:

convicted in any court of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year;

who is a fugitive from justice;

who is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act, codified at 21 U.S.C. § 802);
who has been adjudicated as a mental defective or has been committed to any mental institution;

who is an illegal alien;

who has been discharged from the Armed Forces under dishonorable conditions;
who has renounced his or her United States citizenship;

who is subject to a court order restraining the person from harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner or child of the intimate partner; or
who has been convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence.
The guy had a restraining order against him


Yeah. He had a restraining order against him by a neighbor, with apparently no romantic involvement. I bet Rand Paul's neighbor still has his guns too (if he had any).

quote:


The GCA at 18 U.S.C. § 992(n) also makes it unlawful for any person under indictment for a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year to ship, transport, or receive firearms or ammunition.
The shooter had been arrested for suspicion of assault with a deadly weapon, and still under investigation for that charge


This one's trickier. An arrest is not the same as an indictment. If the police show up to an active crime scene, or take the accused into custody immediately, there is no warrant, thus no indictment until the District Attorney formally presents charges.

quote:


The cops should have seized those guns in January.

But I dont see anyone calling for their heads on a platter.


It would have been tricky at best to take his guns, or put him on a no-buy list. Likely unconstitutional.

Some of the laws could be fine tuned a bit.




DesideriScuri -> RE: Another day, another "small" mass shooting (11/15/2017 2:08:48 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub
I wonder if the pro gun crowd on these boards will ever get tired of defending the gun ownership laws in this country? Just one nut killing after another and all they can think about is their toys... It is sickening and I am beginning to think they are just as insane as those killing women and children.
Marini talking to these assholes is not going to change their selfish minds. Pointing out the absurdity of their stand on guns is sadly a waste of time
Butch

I wonder if the anti gun crowd on these boards will ever get tired of ignoring the other constant in the mass shootings (as bolded above).

Then LETS DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT!!!! Lets get killing guns out of the hands of the insane... who is ignoring THAT! Nearly one in every five gun owners is mentally ill to one extent or another... lets at least try to weed out the dangerous among them and get mass killing weapons out of their possession.
Butch


Just about everyone is ignoring it, which is why it is still a problem. If we do a better job dealing with mental health issues, much of these shootings don't happen. If we do a better job at executing the laws that have already passed, some of these shootings don't happen.

Where did you get your "one in every five gun owners is mentally ill to one extent or another" stat?

What I don't understand at all, is what drives someone to take the life of someone else. If we could figure that out and take concrete steps towards fixing that issue, the share of murders committed with a gun will still likely be the same, but the overall murder rate will drop, regardless of weapon used. That would be a much bigger win, imo.




BamaD -> RE: Another day, another "small" mass shooting (11/15/2017 2:18:40 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

its really not an answer to my point.

no one is suggesting ignoring means of murder or mass murder. im not making an either/or proposition.

im suggesting that since the left makes so much fuss about guns in particular when it comes to murder, when there are so many other ways that they don't fuss over, that something else is likely going on as concerns guns.



How many times have you seen the gun grabbers on here argue that the
.223 is more powerful than a 30-06 0r .308 and for that reason alone
should be banned. They argue from a position of ignorance.

I've not.
I have, on the other hand, seen you repeatedly insist that they are, while failing to back this claim up. A cynic would probably feel that this is what they call a strawman argument.

Them or a person who doesn't pay attention.
How many times have you seen that if you can do something with a "06
"
then there I no need for a person to have something as powerful as an AR-15.

Who on here has made the argument that you're attributing to the evil gun grabbers?
If you can't find something to support your allegation, why are you lying?

For example Kdsub asked why if you can do the job wit an -06 or a 390-30 why do you need to move up to an AR.
Many people have referred to the AR as too powerful for citizens to own.




JVoV -> RE: Another day, another "small" mass shooting (11/15/2017 2:28:57 PM)

I don't put a lot of stock into mental health professionals, because of my own experiences with them, the times that I have sought their services. I got more help watching Oprah ffs.




BamaD -> RE: Another day, another "small" mass shooting (11/15/2017 2:31:06 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

I don't put a lot of stock into mental health professionals, because of my own experiences with them, the times that I have sought their services. I got more help watching Oprah ffs.

You know the old saying that they get into the business because of their own
problems.




kdsub -> RE: Another day, another "small" mass shooting (11/15/2017 2:43:41 PM)

quote:

do a better job dealing with mental health issues, much of these shootings don't happen.


There is much we can agree on. We just have to make it happen.

As for the one in five just do a search for mental illness in the US... over and over the answer is 1 in 5... would you not agree that if 1 in every 5 Americans has a mental illness that would also include gun owners? Now of course not every mental illness will manifest itself in mass murderer but an examination may be able to determine the severity... at least at the minimum it would keep some of the insane from getting weapons. Some is a hell of a lot better than none.

Addressing the mental health problems in the US would be great...but you know we could not force every citizen to be examined... but we could easily require a gun owner to do so... With ownership of weapons should come responsibility.

Butch

PS... I sent you an apology on the other side for my uncalled for post.




DesideriScuri -> RE: Another day, another "small" mass shooting (11/15/2017 2:50:02 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV
I don't put a lot of stock into mental health professionals, because of my own experiences with them, the times that I have sought their services. I got more help watching Oprah ffs.


Perhaps you've just identified one possible deficiency in the way mental health is treated.




jlf1961 -> RE: Another day, another "small" mass shooting (11/15/2017 2:56:02 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

Bama if you want to own weapons that can kill then yes i want you to pay the price to have some assurance of sanity... I do understand your objections for obvious reasons.

Butch



pay the price for having weapons that kill, have you actually thought that through?

Guns are not the only privately owned weapons that kill.

Need I remind you that before guns, there was the crossbow, before that the long bow and composite bows.

And no, composite materials are NOT a modern invention, they have been around for a few thousand years.

Now as for the argument that a .223 is more powerful than the .308, that is a myth, generated by the fact the US Military adopted the 5.56mm or .223 when they went to the M16.

The .308 is a more powerful round, has more stopping power, penetration, longer range etc. source

The whole idea for adopting the 5.56 or .223 was that the bullets were lighter and that meant your average soldier could carry more. That was the only reason that the M16 in 5.56 was adopted.

That said, you can get any number of AR civilian variants in .308, they are more expensive but available. I own two such weapons.

The .223 is great for short range deer hunting, which is why the round was developed in the first place, and then the military 5.56 NATO came after.

Very rarely to military rounds come first, often it is the civilian round that inspires the military.

Of course, the real advantage of the AR type rifle is the magazine capacity. Personally, I never understood why a civilian needs a 10, 15 or 20 round magazine hunting deer. I mean the old bolt actions held between 3 and 7 rounds depending on the make and model and everyone was happy with them, and the lever action 30-30, 44 or 44-40 rifles held seven.

I mean lets face it, if you miss with the first round, the odds are against you getting a second shot at the same target, deer do not stand and wait for the next round to come in, and a running deer in the brush or forest is not going to be an easy target with a semi auto.

Then of course there is the military argument that still train troops to fire single rounds unless the situation is critical, then go full auto. Spray and pray just dont work in any situation unless the targets are in a crowded room, or concert venue etc.

Personally, I use a five round mag when I am just out hunting varmints or the occasional deer, but I prefer my bolt actions for large game.




DesideriScuri -> RE: Another day, another "small" mass shooting (11/15/2017 2:56:20 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub
quote:

do a better job dealing with mental health issues, much of these shootings don't happen.

There is much we can agree on. We just have to make it happen.
As for the one in five just do a search for mental illness in the US... over and over the answer is 1 in 5... would you not agree that if 1 in every 5 Americans has a mental illness that would also include gun owners? Now of course not every mental illness will manifest itself in mass murderer but an examination may be able to determine the severity... at least at the minimum it would keep some of the insane from getting weapons. Some is a hell of a lot better than none.
Addressing the mental health problems in the US would be great...but you know we could not force every citizen to be examined... but we could easily require a gun owner to do so... With ownership of weapons should come responsibility.
Butch


I don't think forcing every gun owner to be examined is the best idea. This topic is way too charged for me to believe there won't be bias introduced in the examiners. I'm willing to bet there are mental health professionals that will allow their biases to come through (both against gun ownership and for gun ownership, btw). On some things, I am a cynic.




kdsub -> RE: Another day, another "small" mass shooting (11/15/2017 2:58:43 PM)

There could easily be a provision for appeal.

Butch




DesideriScuri -> RE: Another day, another "small" mass shooting (11/15/2017 3:01:49 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub
There could easily be a provision for appeal.
Butch


That might work when one thinks one was unfairly prevented from owning a weapon, but what about the other side of that?




kdsub -> RE: Another day, another "small" mass shooting (11/15/2017 3:03:42 PM)

I am not sure what you mean.

Butch




kdsub -> RE: Another day, another "small" mass shooting (11/15/2017 3:30:36 PM)

I would not dismiss your suggestion out of hand... it would help over time requiring smaller mags and making the larger ones illegal... But... it is not the answer although better than nothing...However...what do you think the Bama's of this world and the NRA's reaction would be? As we know the NRA has a ring in the nose of the Republican legislature.

Butch




jlf1961 -> RE: Another day, another "small" mass shooting (11/15/2017 3:53:12 PM)

Well hell, here is a fact on the recent case that kinda throws ban guns argument for a loop.

quote:

Authorities said he was armed with one semi-automatic assault-style rifle and two handguns. A second rifle was later discovered during a search, officials said.

None of the guns were legally in Neal’s possession, Johnston said. The two rifles were “homemade” and unregistered and the two pistols were registered to another person, he said.

A signed court order following Neal’s arrest in January for attacking his neighbor shows he was ordered on April 1 to surrender all firearms.

Johnston said deputies were familiar with the gunman.

“We​ have a history with him,” Johnston said. “He was out on bail for assault with a deadly weapon that occurred in January. He was not law enforcement friendly.”​​​​​​

Tehama CountyDist. Atty. Gregg Cohen said he saw an increasing social problem underlying the incident.

source


However, here is what really bugs me:
quote:

Police knew ‘madman’ had illegal guns before killing spree
RANCHO TEHAMA RESERVE, Calif. (AP) — A day after a killing spree that left five people dead in California, police faced accusations of having previously turned a blind eye to the troubled shooter who was known for firing off guns despite a court order that barred him from owning firearms.

At a tense news conference Wednesday, police conceded that neighbors had repeatedly complained about Kevin Janson Neal firing hundreds of rounds from his house.

Tehama County Assistant Sheriff Phil Johnston said authorities responded to calls several times, but the 44-year-old Neal wouldn’t open the door, so they left.

“He was not law enforcement friendly. He would not come to the door,” Johnston said. “You have to understand we can’t anticipate what people are going to do. We don’t have a crystal ball.”
source




Excuse me, but isnt that what search warrants are for?

Yeah, I know, probable cause.

However, the judge ordered him to turn over his guns, and after that order was issued, the neighbors called with reports of him shooting guns on his property.

If that aint probable cause, then nothing is.

Man someone wearing a badge screwed the pooch on this one.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625