WhoreMods -> RE: Another day, another "small" mass shooting (11/18/2017 11:24:17 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: jlf1961 quote:
ORIGINAL: WhoreMods So why are you forever whining on here when a [Word removed] defends themself from the police using their constitutionally protected right to bear arms? Uh, for one thing, firing on a police officer is not self defense, it is, regardless of circumstance, attempted capital murder of a law enforcement officer. A second point, a wise man, regardless of skin color, will inform a police officer of the fact he has a weapon and then, using very slow movements, puts the weapon in view of the officer and steps away. Now of course, this is assuming that you are dealing with a police officer that is not a cross between Barney Fife and Rambo, in which case, even if you follow the procedure outlined in ever concealed carry course, you are fucked. Which brings us to this unsettling point, at least a third of active duty law enforcement officers should not have a badge, gun (real or toy) and probably are a danger to the general public due to attitude or personal beliefs. Or in the case of this sheriff and his department, have no desire to do their job properly or have the slightest notion what 'protect and serve' means. All good points, but not what I was getting at. The poster I answered is forever bleating about the sacred second being there to protect the people from government oppression, but also spends a lot of his time complaining about the uppity [Word removed] protesting institutionalised oppression of their bloods by The Man by shooting the occasional cop who's more bent than a male chorus line in a San Francisco theatre doing the can can in drag at a fundraiser for an AIDS charity. Forever harping on the former while making excuses for the latter is a pretty repulsive double standard, frankly. If the [Word removed] don't have the right to bar arms against their oppressors in the corrupt government system, why the hell should anybody else?
|
|
|
|