More "pro family' legislators

More "pro family' legislators (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Hillwilliam -> More "pro family' legislators (11/17/2017 11:18:19 AM)
https://www.yahoo.com/news/anti-lgbt-lawmaker-resigns-being-140200984.html

WhoreMods -> RE: More "pro family' legislators (11/17/2017 11:21:22 AM)
This sort of thing does pose a question that needs an urgent answer: Just how much cock is Rush Limbaugh getting? He's the cheerleader for this stuff so he's got to have more cocks on tap than Colonel Saunders...

Hillwilliam -> RE: More "pro family' legislators (11/17/2017 11:29:23 AM)
but Hillary/but Obama post in 3.........2...................1

WinsomeDefiance -> RE: More "pro family' legislators (11/17/2017 11:44:10 AM)
It has always seemed to me; people oppose the "loudest", those things they struggle with the most.

WhoreMods -> RE: More "pro family' legislators (11/17/2017 11:46:18 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance It has always seemed to me; people oppose the "loudest", those things they struggle with the most. Which raises some interesting questions about Bosco...

Lucylastic -> RE: More "pro family' legislators (11/17/2017 12:36:20 PM)
I posted this the other day Hill, strangely, no one commented on it. http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=5089878 I dont wonder why

bounty44 -> RE: More "pro family' legislators (11/17/2017 2:11:39 PM)
perhaps because people get tired of your inability to actually understand things as opposed to painting everything in a light for political hay? but i'll try to help: this topic has been covered before. when someone on the right "fails" the comrades see it as the ultimate hypocrisy (as if the left really do have a moral leg to stand on)---while the people on the right recognize the fallen nature of man and often how difficult it sometimes for our behavior to live up to or even be consistent with our moral standards. it doesn't necessarily follow from that that we should change our standards or re-think what we believe. reconciling beliefs and behavior is a challenge, and occasionally, perhaps unfortunately, people hold them in parallel tracks.

Lucylastic -> RE: More "pro family' legislators (11/17/2017 2:43:56 PM)
oh the irony and the hypocrisy. I dont lack any ability to understand your pov. Im not an old white man.

BoscoX -> RE: More "pro family' legislators (11/17/2017 2:45:14 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Whoreboy Which raises some interesting questions about Bosco... You are a moron You think I might be a Muslim? Because I don’t post negative things about gays You’re screaming “faggot” right here though, boy It’s what leftist trash does best, and this thread is a great example of that

BoscoX -> RE: More "pro family' legislators (11/17/2017 2:47:19 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods This sort of thing does pose a question that needs an urgent answer: Just how much cock is Rush Limbaugh getting? He's the cheerleader for this stuff so he's got to have more cocks on tap than Colonel Saunders... What leftist trash does best...[:D]

MasterDrakk -> RE: More "pro family' legislators (11/17/2017 2:48:22 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 perhaps because people get tired of your inability to actually understand things as opposed to painting everything in a light for political hay? but i'll try to help: this topic has been covered before. when someone on the right "fails" the comrades see it as the ultimate hypocrisy (as if the left really do have a moral leg to stand on)---while the people on the right recognize the fallen nature of man and often how difficult it sometimes for our behavior to live up to or even be consistent with our moral standards. it doesn't necessarily follow from that that we should change our standards or re-think what we believe. reconciling beliefs and behavior is a challenge, and occasionally, perhaps unfortunately, people hold them in parallel tracks. You need constant supervision, you fall so often and never learn. So you are recognizing the fallen nature of Hillary and beaming with pride, and saying go ahead, I believe in you, you can do it. We see that in you out here comrade.

MercTech -> RE: More "pro family' legislators (11/17/2017 3:00:20 PM)
A politician panders to his constituency by trash talking gays while being a closet homosexual. Is this a LGBT issue or a disingenuous professional politician issue?

WhoreMods -> RE: More "pro family' legislators (11/18/2017 6:46:56 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: Whoreboy Which raises some interesting questions about Bosco... You are a moron You think I might be a Muslim? Because I don’t post negative things about gays You’re screaming “faggot” right here though, boy It’s what leftist trash does best, and this thread is a great example of that I was thinking more of pedophillia than homosexuality or religious issues, in fact, but you talk so much crap that I appreciate it might have been hard to guess which of your many overcompensated hypocrisies I had in mind.

Hillwilliam -> RE: More "pro family' legislators (11/18/2017 6:49:58 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 perhaps because people get tired of your inability to actually understand things as opposed to painting everything in a light for political hay? but i'll try to help: this topic has been covered before. when someone on the right "fails" the comrades see it as the ultimate hypocrisy (as if the left really do have a moral leg to stand on)---while the people on the right recognize the fallen nature of man and often how difficult it sometimes for our behavior to live up to or even be consistent with our moral standards. it doesn't necessarily follow from that that we should change our standards or re-think what we believe. reconciling beliefs and behavior is a challenge, and occasionally, perhaps unfortunately, people hold them in parallel tracks. Like very religious people who commonly bear false witness? [8\|]

DesideriScuri -> RE: More "pro family' legislators (11/18/2017 7:16:08 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MercTech A politician panders to his constituency by trash talking gays while being a closet homosexual. Is this a LGBT issue or a disingenuous professional politician issue? I think it's more of the latter. He deserves the criticisms he is getting and will be getting until such a time as he admits his shortcomings and legitimately repents.

WhoreMods -> RE: More "pro family' legislators (11/18/2017 10:29:56 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 perhaps because people get tired of your inability to actually understand things as opposed to painting everything in a light for political hay? but i'll try to help: this topic has been covered before. when someone on the right "fails" the comrades see it as the ultimate hypocrisy (as if the left really do have a moral leg to stand on)---while the people on the right recognize the fallen nature of man and often how difficult it sometimes for our behavior to live up to or even be consistent with our moral standards. it doesn't necessarily follow from that that we should change our standards or re-think what we believe. reconciling beliefs and behavior is a challenge, and occasionally, perhaps unfortunately, people hold them in parallel tracks. Like very religious people who commonly bear false witness? [8\|] They probably wear mixed fibre fabrics as well, and I'll bet you any money they all covet like crazy. (Some of the closet cases probably covet their neighbours' arses bigtime...)

ThatDizzyChick -> RE: More "pro family' legislators (11/20/2017 9:43:49 AM)
Too fucking funny!

Edwird -> RE: More "pro family' legislators (11/20/2017 11:12:47 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 perhaps because people get tired of your inability to actually understand things as opposed to painting everything in a light for political hay? quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 Oh no! Comrades! What a fuckwit.

Edwird -> RE: More "pro family' legislators (11/20/2017 11:55:00 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam https://www.yahoo.com/news/anti-lgbt-lawmaker-resigns-being-140200984.html Ah, but you overlook the economic side of the Republican "pro-family" ideology. The "pro-family" Republicans ended the program sending welfare recipients to school for training but instead wanted them to work as Molly Maids (or whatever most closely resembling slavery the law allows) right now!, and then have babies. They coulda been computer support techs or been working at transportation logistics or at least been practical nurses, and had babies once they got that far, but apparently the Republicans felt that to be an "anti-family" stance, and would have none of it. "Molly Maids! NOW! bitch!" Greater contribution to national accounts, GDP, etc. would have been in the bargain too (with the educational program) , along with the better situation for kids, but Republicans can't add. And they are greatly pissed off at anybody who can, and rely on such like constituency to get elected. It seems to be working famously thus far. "Pro family." The "pro-family" Republicans increase national sales of Depends five-fold if anybody even mentions raising the artificially low minimum wage, so that notion is apparently "anti family" by their estimation. From the Republicans' standpoint, forcing kids to eat less well, have fewer clothes, and have fewer opportunities as result of Republicans screwing their hard working parents every chance they get is . . . (you guessed it) "pro family." Oh, then there's Republican's adamant and powerful defense of the predatory lending industry, which preys on the vastly underpaid. Yet another "pro family" venture of theirs. Lot's more where that came from. Lots more.

MrRodgers -> RE: More "pro family' legislators (11/20/2017 11:56:25 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance It has always seemed to me; people oppose the "loudest", those things they struggle with the most. As a charade to make and keep friends, oppose the issues they do, push the same issues they do and hope they listen and accept you, while they never know...[he] is a fraud.

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

4.296875E-02