RE: Back Memory Lane: Hillary attacked her husband's accusers (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Lucylastic -> RE: Back Memory Lane: Hillary attacked her husband's accusers (11/29/2017 6:58:21 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75



That's just again finding shit to discredit a woman who was raped, when she would be so traumatised by the whole experience. The last thing she wanna remember is how his penis look like.


do you know what nightmares, flashbacks and vivid memories are???


Its not even about that.

It would be like me telling the story about how you raped me with your big black penis that was uncircumcised, pierced 3 times, curved 90° to the right, had a giant mushroom head, and a tattoo of Free Willy on it.

Now, if you refuse to show us your penis, then it's obvious that you have something to hide.

no question, but people remember vividly the strangest things that happened to them while being violated..even decades down the road...
it can be unreliable in court, but its horrendous for the "sufferer"
If I didnt have the described penis, I would have been flashing that thing around like it was kim khardsians bum




JVoV -> RE: Back Memory Lane: Hillary attacked her husband's accusers (11/29/2017 7:03:30 PM)

Exactly. Which is why Bubba whipped it out as part of the investigation.




Greta75 -> RE: Back Memory Lane: Hillary attacked her husband's accusers (11/29/2017 9:18:54 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV
The woman was the one telling the story, with very specific details about Bubba's junk as part of the story. When Kenneth Starr investigated, Bubba had to drop trou and show his junk, which proved the woman had in fact LIED about the Presidential Penis.


Let's talk about the woman who clinton raped:

Clinton had raped a woman named Juanita Broaddrick. When private investigators hired by Jones' attorneys asked Broaddrick to file an affidavit detailing the assault she refused, saying, "I just don't want to re-live that. You know, it was just a horrible, horrible thing for me and I wouldn't relive it for anything... you can't get to him, and I'm not going to ruin my good name to do it... there's just absolutely no way anyone can get to him, he's just too vicious." Broaddrick added that she would deny everything to keep herself out of the press. Broaddrick went a step further, filing an affidavit as Jane Doe #5 saying that the rumors about a sexual assault were untrue.

Despite her refusal, one of Paula Jones' attorneys exposed Broaddrick by using her full name in a 1998 filing in Federal Court. After the press got a hold of her name, Broaddrick decided to tell her version of events to Dateline NBC.

In 1978, during Clinton's gubernatorial run, he visited a nursing home where Broaddrick was an administrator. She expressed interest in volunteering for his campaign, and the two later met to discuss her involvement. According to Broaddrick, some weeks later, Clinton suggested the two meet in her hotel room (where Broaddrick was staying for conference). Once inside her room, Broaddrick, who was married, claimed Clinton attempted to kiss her.

"I pushed him away, I told him, 'No,'" Broaddrick told Dateline's Lisa Myers. During the Myers interview, Broaddrick broke down in tears as she detailed Clinton's alleged physical advances:

Then he tries to kiss me again. And the second time he tries to kiss me he starts biting my lip ... He starts to, um, bite on my top lip and I tried to pull away from him. And then he forces me down on the bed. And I just was very frightened, and I tried to get away from him, and I told him, 'No,' that I didn't want this to happen, but he wouldn't listen to me ... It was a real panicky, panicky situation. I was even to the point where I was getting very noisy, you know, yelling to 'Please stop.' And that's when he pressed down on my right shoulder and he would bite my lip... When everything was over with, he got up and straightened himself, and I was crying at the moment, and he walks to the door and calmly puts on his sunglasses. And before he goes out the door he says, 'You better get some ice on that.' And he turned and went out the door."

Three weeks later, Broaddrick participated in a fundraiser event for Clinton. "I think I was still in denial," Broaddrick told Myers. "I still felt very guilty at that time, that it was my fault. By letting him come to the room, I had given him the wrong idea."

When asked by Myers why she didn't come forward earlier, Broaddrick said, "I just don't think anyone would have believed me."

Broaddrick could not recall the exact date or month of the assault in 1978. The issue of her volunteering and faulty memory were used against Broaddrick in scathing op-eds issued by Clinton supporters and pundits across media platforms. Bill Press, the then co-host of CNN's Crossfire, published an editorial in a 1999 edition of the Los Angeles Times calling Broaddrick's story "fishy," in which he went on speculate about Broaddrick's true motives:

"She did not press charges at the time [of the alleged attack], which is not uncommon but obviously made it harder to evaluate her allegation when it became public more than 20 years later," says Baker, who was a staff writer for The Washington Post at the time. "Her husband and a friend both told us at The Post that she told them about the encounter... and had consistently stuck by her account with them for two decades."


https://broadly.vice.com/en_us/article/9aex4e/believe-all-victims-a-primer-on-bill-clintons-groping-and-rape-allegations

In 1978, she would be disparaged all the way and very low chance of getting any justice. In 2017, if this happened today, she would be protected and be believed.

Hillary enabled a husband to do this! And you guys remembering details from Lib media protecting Clinton and disparaging the victims to claim it's fine is also kinda disgusting.




Greta75 -> RE: Back Memory Lane: Hillary attacked her husband's accusers (11/29/2017 9:27:54 PM)

I tell you what is a big difference between sexual allegations against Trump today versus Clinton back then.

1) Every single media, and both republicans and democrats WANT TRUMP impeach! Republicans want their Pence President. Dems just want Trump out! Media all hates him. THERE IS NO WAY IF THERE ONE LEGITIMATE CASE, that all combine powers have not used it to bring him down. On top of that, anybody with information that leads to Trump impeachment will be awarded 10 Mil USD. There is EVERYTHING and every support out there for any legitimate case! IF this poor girl approach Mark Cuban or Mitt Romney for financial help to fight this legally with Trump. I know any of Trump enemies would gladly finance her.


2) Bill Clinton was loved and protected by the media. They defended him when he was accuse of sexual assault, they attack the women who accuse him. Bill also had better PR skills and had much better relationships with both parties. So he had all the powers to take down all the women who wanted to come out and speak out.

The only problem is, Lewinsky where he dropped the ball. And got tangled in bald face lie with evidence.





Greta75 -> RE: Back Memory Lane: Hillary attacked her husband's accusers (11/29/2017 10:26:43 PM)

I just read one example of Trump's accusers. This woman claim Trump grab her pussy.

But the biggest hole in her story is. After accusing Trump and dropping it against Trump. She then proceed to date Trump again. And then on Trump running for Election, she wrote supportive letters to back his Presidency.

1992 she accuse Trump of grabbing her pussy and sued him for it. 1998 became his girlfriend.

Infact even in 1992, although she said she felt sexually assaulted, but then she also said that, Trump doesn't seem to realise it's sexual assault and is under the impression that she is crazy about him and sexually desire him to do that.

That's the weirdest part. Which then the fact that she dated him after suing him for sexual harrassment, is kinda bringing credentials to Trump saying she was a willing party all along. Why the hell would she stay in friendly relations with a man who sexually assaulted her that she was hurt enough to sue.

https://www.vox.com/2016/10/12/13234224/donald-trump-jill-harth-sexual-assault

Too fucking bizarre. And there is some love hate thing going on with her and him.




tj444 -> RE: Back Memory Lane: Hillary attacked her husband's accusers (11/30/2017 9:44:46 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

In this time where we should believe women's sexual harassment claims and don't trivalise them.

Hillary was one of the culprits who went all out to discredit and insult the women who accuse her husband of sexual misconduct.

This is why I am glad she is not President. She is not representation for women. I feel like her history filled with victimizing and discrediting women who her husband has abused.



Really??? I recall you saying here on the forum some time ago that before Trump decided to run, that you were all for Hillary becoming the first female Prez & you were wanting her to win.. All this stuff didnt bother you about her before Trump came on the political scene.. now all of a sudden it does??? [8|] BTW, she lost, get over it...




JVoV -> RE: Back Memory Lane: Hillary attacked her husband's accusers (12/1/2017 2:22:53 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

In this time where we should believe women's sexual harassment claims and don't trivalise them.

Hillary was one of the culprits who went all out to discredit and insult the women who accuse her husband of sexual misconduct.

This is why I am glad she is not President. She is not representation for women. I feel like her history filled with victimizing and discrediting women who her husband has abused.



Really??? I recall you saying here on the forum some time ago that before Trump decided to run, that you were all for Hillary becoming the first female Prez & you were wanting her to win.. All this stuff didnt bother you about her before Trump came on the political scene.. now all of a sudden it does??? [8|] BTW, she lost, get over it...


Meanwhile, I was supporting Bernie, as I think many of us were.

Hillary had enough strikes against her of her own, without adding Bubba's sins to her scorecard.

She had remarks on undocumented citizens in her time as NY Senator that worried me every bit as much as Trump's position. She supported DOMA, then tried to sell it to us as 'the best we could do at the time'. She supported racially biased criminal sentencing and private prisons, without solid efforts of providing alternatives to youth tempted to go down the wrong path.

I'm never going to vote for Bill Clinton again. Ok, maybe if he does Dancing With The Stars. But other than that, no. And if Hillary is the best candidate the Democrats have, then we're in trouble.




tj444 -> RE: Back Memory Lane: Hillary attacked her husband's accusers (12/1/2017 12:41:03 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

In this time where we should believe women's sexual harassment claims and don't trivalise them.

Hillary was one of the culprits who went all out to discredit and insult the women who accuse her husband of sexual misconduct.

This is why I am glad she is not President. She is not representation for women. I feel like her history filled with victimizing and discrediting women who her husband has abused.



Really??? I recall you saying here on the forum some time ago that before Trump decided to run, that you were all for Hillary becoming the first female Prez & you were wanting her to win.. All this stuff didnt bother you about her before Trump came on the political scene.. now all of a sudden it does??? [8|] BTW, she lost, get over it...


Meanwhile, I was supporting Bernie, as I think many of us were.

Hillary had enough strikes against her of her own, without adding Bubba's sins to her scorecard.

She had remarks on undocumented citizens in her time as NY Senator that worried me every bit as much as Trump's position. She supported DOMA, then tried to sell it to us as 'the best we could do at the time'. She supported racially biased criminal sentencing and private prisons, without solid efforts of providing alternatives to youth tempted to go down the wrong path.

I'm never going to vote for Bill Clinton again. Ok, maybe if he does Dancing With The Stars. But other than that, no. And if Hillary is the best candidate the Democrats have, then we're in trouble.


She is definitely a POS, being just as slimy as the best of the rest of them.. her and Bill made a $hitload of million$ peddling her influence when she was $ecretary of $tate for those 8 lucrative years.. she would sell anyone and any principle out in a heart beat if there was cash in her/Bill's hand..




WhoreMods -> RE: Back Memory Lane: Hillary attacked her husband's accusers (12/1/2017 12:42:06 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

In this time where we should believe women's sexual harassment claims and don't trivalise them.

Hillary was one of the culprits who went all out to discredit and insult the women who accuse her husband of sexual misconduct.

This is why I am glad she is not President. She is not representation for women. I feel like her history filled with victimizing and discrediting women who her husband has abused.



Really??? I recall you saying here on the forum some time ago that before Trump decided to run, that you were all for Hillary becoming the first female Prez & you were wanting her to win.. All this stuff didnt bother you about her before Trump came on the political scene.. now all of a sudden it does??? [8|] BTW, she lost, get over it...


Meanwhile, I was supporting Bernie, as I think many of us were.

Hillary had enough strikes against her of her own, without adding Bubba's sins to her scorecard.

She had remarks on undocumented citizens in her time as NY Senator that worried me every bit as much as Trump's position. She supported DOMA, then tried to sell it to us as 'the best we could do at the time'. She supported racially biased criminal sentencing and private prisons, without solid efforts of providing alternatives to youth tempted to go down the wrong path.

I'm never going to vote for Bill Clinton again. Ok, maybe if he does Dancing With The Stars. But other than that, no. And if Hillary is the best candidate the Democrats have, then we're in trouble.


She is definitely a POS, being just as slimy as the best of the rest of them.. her and Bill made a $hitload of million$ peddling her influence when she was $ecretary of $tate for those 8 lucrative years.. she would sell anyone and any principle out in a heart beat if there was cash in her/Bill's hand..

Quite.
You'd almost think she'd married a Bush, not somebody called Clinton.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875