Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

U.S. attorney general Sessions evasive on Russia probe: congressmen


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> U.S. attorney general Sessions evasive on Russia probe: congressmen Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
U.S. attorney general Sessions evasive on Russia probe:... - 12/1/2017 6:51:01 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-people-mattlauer/matt-lauer-apologizes-after-today-firing-as-more-women-come-forward-idUSKBN1DU1NR
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions refused to answer questions on Thursday during a closed congressional hearing about whether President Donald Trump ever instructed him to hinder the Justice Department’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, according to Democratic lawmakers who attended.

Sessions testified behind closed doors for several hours before the U.S. House of Representatives Intelligence Committee.

Representative Adam Schiff, the committee’s top Democrat, told reporters he was troubled by Sessions’ refusal to answer what he believes are essential questions.

“I asked the attorney general whether he was ever instructed by the president to take any action that he believed would hinder the Russia investigation and he declined to answer the question,” Schiff told reporters after the hearing.

“There is no privileged basis to decline to answer a question like that. If the president did not instruct him to take an action that would hinder the investigation, he should say so. If the president did instruct him to hinder the investigation in any way, in my view that would be a potential criminal act,” Schiff said.

Representative Mike Quigley, another Democratic committee member, said on MSNBC that Sessions “is one of the most forgetful persons who works out of Washington, D.C., or he’s being less than candid with the American public.”

Sessions declined to comment to reporters as he left the secure hearing room.

The panel is among several congressional committees, along with the Justice Department’s special counsel Robert Mueller, investigating allegations that Russia sought to influence the U.S. election and potential collusion by Trump’s campaign.

Moscow has denied any meddling and Trump has said there was no collusion.

Another source familiar with his testimony said that Sessions said he could not remember the answers to many important questions, and the answers he did provide concerning meetings with Russians tracked statements he had previously made in other congressional hearings.

NOTHING IMPROPER
A spokeswoman for Sessions said he has consistently declined to discuss his communications with Trump in the past, and that he has also previously said he was never instructed to do anything illegal or improper.

When he was a Republican U.S. senator, Sessions was an early supporter and close adviser to Trump during his run for the White House.

Democrats have accused Sessions of repeatedly changing his sworn testimony throughout several prior congressional hearings about meetings and contacts between the Trump campaign and Russian officials.


Schiff said committee members asked Sessions questions during the closed hearing about his prior testimony and about “interactions the campaign had with Russia.”

The intelligence committee also met for more than three hours on Thursday with Erik Prince, who founded the private military contractor Blackwater and was a supporter of Trump’s presidential campaign.

One focus of Thursday’s interview was expected to be a meeting Prince had in the Seychelles Islands in January, which some news reports later described as an effort to connect the incoming Trump administration with Moscow.

Prince’s sister, Betsy DeVos, is Trump’s Secretary of Education, and he has said the Seychelles meeting had nothing to do with Trump.

Schiff told reporters there were some “unresolved issues” after Prince’s testimony. Prince complained that the hearing had wasted time and taxpayer dollars on a “meaningless fishing expedition.”

A spokesman for Prince later issued a statement saying Prince had volunteered to answer questions. “As we have said throughout, Mr. Prince has never acted on behalf of President Trump, the transition team or his administration regarding Russia.”

The Republican-led committee is planning to publicly release the transcript of Prince’s closed hearing, described as “public in a closed setting” within about three days.

There is no plan to release a transcript from Sessions’ testimony.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: U.S. attorney general Sessions evasive on Russia pr... - 12/1/2017 11:25:33 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-people-mattlauer/matt-lauer-apologizes-after-today-firing-as-more-women-come-forward-idUSKBN1DU1NR

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia/u-s-attorney-general-sessions-evasive-on-russia-probe-congressmen-idUSKBN1DU2A9

...
Representative Adam Schiff, the committee’s top Democrat, told reporters he was troubled by Sessions’ refusal to answer what he believes are essential questions.
“I asked the attorney general whether he was ever instructed by the president to take any action that he believed would hinder the Russia investigation and he declined to answer the question,” Schiff told reporters after the hearing.
“There is no privileged basis to decline to answer a question like that. If the president did not instruct him to take an action that would hinder the investigation, he should say so. If the president did instruct him to hinder the investigation in any way, in my view that would be a potential criminal act,” Schiff said.


Corrected the link.

Schiff is butthurt that Sessions didn't answer questions that Schiff thought would expose a criminal act. If Sessions has (as pointed out by the article) previously stated Trump has never asked him to do anything illegal, then not answering a repeated question isn't out of the ordinary. It's almost like Schiff is whining because his badgering wasn't successful.




_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: U.S. attorney general Sessions evasive on Russia pr... - 12/1/2017 11:29:58 AM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-people-mattlauer/matt-lauer-apologizes-after-today-firing-as-more-women-come-forward-idUSKBN1DU1NR

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia/u-s-attorney-general-sessions-evasive-on-russia-probe-congressmen-idUSKBN1DU2A9

...
Representative Adam Schiff, the committee’s top Democrat, told reporters he was troubled by Sessions’ refusal to answer what he believes are essential questions.
“I asked the attorney general whether he was ever instructed by the president to take any action that he believed would hinder the Russia investigation and he declined to answer the question,” Schiff told reporters after the hearing.
“There is no privileged basis to decline to answer a question like that. If the president did not instruct him to take an action that would hinder the investigation, he should say so. If the president did instruct him to hinder the investigation in any way, in my view that would be a potential criminal act,” Schiff said.


Corrected the link.

Schiff is butthurt that Sessions didn't answer questions that Schiff thought would expose a criminal act. If Sessions has (as pointed out by the article) previously stated Trump has never asked him to do anything illegal, then not answering a repeated question isn't out of the ordinary. It's almost like Schiff is whining because his badgering wasn't successful.




Making America Great Again, like it was during the McCarthy witch hunts?

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: U.S. attorney general Sessions evasive on Russia pr... - 12/1/2017 3:05:06 PM   
Wayward5oul


Posts: 3314
Joined: 11/9/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-people-mattlauer/matt-lauer-apologizes-after-today-firing-as-more-women-come-forward-idUSKBN1DU1NR

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia/u-s-attorney-general-sessions-evasive-on-russia-probe-congressmen-idUSKBN1DU2A9

...
Representative Adam Schiff, the committee’s top Democrat, told reporters he was troubled by Sessions’ refusal to answer what he believes are essential questions.
“I asked the attorney general whether he was ever instructed by the president to take any action that he believed would hinder the Russia investigation and he declined to answer the question,” Schiff told reporters after the hearing.
“There is no privileged basis to decline to answer a question like that. If the president did not instruct him to take an action that would hinder the investigation, he should say so. If the president did instruct him to hinder the investigation in any way, in my view that would be a potential criminal act,” Schiff said.


Corrected the link.

Schiff is butthurt that Sessions didn't answer questions that Schiff thought would expose a criminal act. If Sessions has (as pointed out by the article) previously stated Trump has never asked him to do anything illegal, then not answering a repeated question isn't out of the ordinary. It's almost like Schiff is whining because his badgering wasn't successful.




I wonder if his previous statements denying any wrongdoing by anyone were made under oath. Was this testimony under oath? Making general statements denying wrongdoing carries no real consequences if false. Making the same statement under oath does.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 4
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> U.S. attorney general Sessions evasive on Russia probe: congressmen Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.063