RE: SO Much Winning!!!

RE: SO Much Winning!!! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

BoscoX -> RE: SO Much Winning!!! (12/6/2017 5:10:16 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: heavyblinker You stupid bitch. quote: (of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining RATHER THAN. AS IN it's only a fallacy when the content of your dumbass post is ignored. THIS: quote: He won because he lied his ass off and people were stupid enough to believe him. Politicians as usual aren't great, but they beat the total debasement of the Presidency and the utter humiliation of the US on a global scale. deals with your post. And of course you ignored it. Your post consisted purely of ad hominems against myself, against the president, and against the electorate, "stupid bitch" (Why does leftist trash hate women so much) [:D]

heavyblinker -> RE: SO Much Winning!!! (12/6/2017 5:40:47 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: heavyblinker You stupid bitch. quote: (of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining RATHER THAN. AS IN it's only a fallacy when the content of your dumbass post is ignored. THIS: quote: He won because he lied his ass off and people were stupid enough to believe him. Politicians as usual aren't great, but they beat the total debasement of the Presidency and the utter humiliation of the US on a global scale. deals with your post. And of course you ignored it. Your post consisted purely of ad hominems against myself, against the president, and against the electorate, "stupid bitch" (Why does leftist trash hate women so much) [:D] The premise here is that the people were deceived and they should have known better. It isn't wrong to call Trump a liar-- he is one, and not just your average lying politician. It was easy to see throughout his campaign. I am not going to avoid making an argument that insults you simply because it insults you, especially if it is true. But then, arguing with you is mostly just frustrating, because you never have any insights or clever responses to anything.

BoscoX -> RE: SO Much Winning!!! (12/6/2017 5:59:48 AM)
The premise is that you want to substitute your childish cheesy personal attacks for real, substantive arguments All you have, literally, are these tired fallacies (that kind of thing) Day in and day out Just like every other leftist posting here, or anywhere else

Lucylastic -> RE: SO Much Winning!!! (12/7/2017 10:15:03 AM)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/on-second-thought-trump-decides-not-to-give-peace-a-chance/2017/12/06/1909a90e-dac1-11e7-b1a8-62589434a581_story.html Opinion only, but fairly accurate, in my opinion. There is more at the link. By Dana Milbank Opinion writer December 6 at 4:35 PM “We’re going to win so much, you’re going to be so sick and tired of winning. . . . And I’m going to say, ‘I’m sorry, but we’re going to keep winning, winning, winning.’ ” — Presidential candidate Donald Trump, May 2016 “We don’t have any wins on the board yet.” — Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, Dec. 5, 2017 We are losing, losing, losing. We are losing with North Korea, getting closer to nuclear war. We are losing with Russia and China, which are expanding their power unchecked. We are losing in trade as imports from China and Mexico hit records. We are losing with longtime allies that condemn us. We are losing with our secretary of state, undercut by his own boss. We are losing with our former national security adviser, now a felon. I say to President Trump: “I am so tired of losing. I don’t want to lose any more.” And Trump says: “I’m sorry, but we’re going to keep losing. Now we are going to lose in the Middle East.” Earlier this year, Trump proclaimed that a deal in the region is “maybe not as difficult as people have thought over the years.” As recently as two months ago he said this of his administration’s peace plan: “I want to give that a shot before I even think about moving the embassy to Jerusalem.” So much for giving peace a “shot.” With Wednesday’s announcement that he’s recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and moving the U.S. Embassy there, he’s effectively throwing in the towel on Mideast peace. He’s inflaming Arab allies, denying the United States legitimacy as a broker and putting already remote hopes of a peace deal into the category of pipe dreams. Not only did he announce the embassy move, but he also softened the longtime American commitment to a two-state solution (embraced by George W. Bush in 2002), saying the United States would support two states “if agreed to by both sides.”

MrRodgers -> RE: SO Much Winning!!! (12/7/2017 1:04:59 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic Well it isnt actually over, so a victory in a single battle isnt winning the war. The ban can continue, for now. I'm confused. Once the SCOTUS rules on the constitutionality, it's still not over? Would that also apply to ... Brown v. Board of Education? Roe v. Wade? ObamaCare? Gay Marriage? I always thought the "benchmark" to being "settled law" was once the SCOTUS had ruled? Seriously Michael ? Roe v Wade, Obamacare and gay marriage if one goes by all of the continuing political, court, state law manipulations since, all of which the right has been 'howling' about for decades on Roe but on the more recent...ever since the rulings. One wouldn't deduct that they all saw them as settled law. One would have a right to suspect that even though [they] are settled law too, millions are still not in agreement and have taken many steps to force people back to illegal abortions, ER only for million's needing health care and well gays. Fuck them right ? And oh BTW, it took the US 15 years after attempts at legislation, defunding, closures and more court battles to achieve integrated education. It took until 1968 14 years after B v Bd. of ed. (1954) to integrate Va. schools.

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875