wickedsdesires
Posts: 364
Joined: 10/25/2008
Status: offline
|
I know there's a list circulating among that crowd.
There is. Even the ones circulating the lists haven't read any of those books. One person has reported more books than anyone. He is at about 40 now and works for one of those Pacs.
You would kinda figure if someone from Scotland knows this then a few Americans should?
As of 2020, the top ten reasons books were challenged and banned books included sexual content (92.5% percent of books on the list); offensive language (61.5%); unsuited to age group (49%); religious viewpoint (26%); LGBTQIA+ content (23.5%); violence (19%); racism (16.5%); drugs, alcohol, and smoking (12.5%); "anti-family" content (7%); and political viewpoint (6.5%).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most_commonly_challenged_books_in_the_United_States
Correct me if I am wrong but what happened to free speech or does apply that only apply to the likes of Trump over throwing democracy?
ALA documented 1,269 demands to censor library books and resources in 2022, the highest number of attempted book bans since ALA began compiling data about censorship in libraries more than 20 years ago. The unparalleled number of reported book challenges in 2022 nearly doubles the 729 book challenges reported in 2021. Of the record 2,571 unique titles targeted for censorship, the most challenged and reasons cited for censoring the books are listed below.
https://www.ala.org/advocacy/bbooks/frequentlychallengedbooks/top10
I am sad to say some books in the UK have had the odd line changed eg Roald Dahl rewrites: edited language in books criticised as ‘absurd censorship’
Critics are accusing the British publisher of Roald Dahl’s classic children’s books of censorship after it removed colourful language from works such as Charlie and the Chocolate Factory and Matilda to make them more acceptable to modern readers.
A review of new editions of Dahl’s books now available in bookstores shows that some passages relating to weight, mental health, gender and race were altered. The changes made by Puffin Books, a division of Penguin Random House, first were reported by Britain’s Daily Telegraph newspaper.
Augustus Gloop, Charlie’s gluttonous antagonist in Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, which originally was published in 1964, is no longer “enormously fat,” just “enormous”. In the new edition of Witches, a supernatural female posing as an ordinary woman may be working as a “top scientist or running a business” instead of as a “cashier in a supermarket or typing letters for a businessman”.
The word “black” was removed from the description of the terrible tractors in 1970s The Fabulous Mr Fox. The machines are now simply “murderous, brutal-looking monsters”.
Booker prize-winning author Salman Rushdie was among those who reacted angrily to the rewriting of Dahl’s words. Rushdie lived in hiding for years after Iran’s Grand Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in 1989 issued a fatwa calling for his death because of the alleged blasphemy in his novel The Satanic Verses. He was attacked and seriously injured last year at an event in New York state.
In our instance it just seems like the politically correct mob, which is a lot different from what is happening in America.
My stance is no books should be censored. No statues removed either. It is called History. At a push they can update the plaques
|
Georgia Election Subversion Case - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread