perverseangelic -> RE: What different types of safe words do You use~ (12/15/2004 10:44:21 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth Even under a Dom/sub versus Master/slave relationship, sessions usually have a goal of achieving inner peace, satisfaction and catharsis, an almost total transcendental emotional state, some label it 'sub-space'. If 'sub-space' is defined as this TOTAL giving, TOTAL release, TOTAL mental and emotional commitment to the experience; how do you reconcile keeping one part of your brain focused on a 'safe-word'? But all of them don't. I guess I'm one of the view who doesn't really do the "sub space" thing, nor care to. I don't feel that an altered state of conviousness is necessary for me to be completely invovled in what is going on. I'm not a big fan of altered states of connciousness on the whole, though. Still, that's neither here nor there. I think that in most cases, keeping a part of the brain able to use your safeword is a safe gaurd, pure and simple. It's not necessary (IMHO) when a couple/group has been together long enough to read each other well, however, before that time I believe that the sumbmissive partner is equally responsible for his/her wellbeing as is the dominant partner. Do you know believe that someone can submit to someone else completely while still looking out for their own well-being? Do you think that it's a -good- thing to be totally giving? Perhaps in the sense of one individual scene-type activity, yes, maybe, but I think being totally giving is probably a bad idea when it comes to keeping one's self both sane and happy as a functioning human. Dunno.
|
|
|
|