Noah -> RE: What should I know about Him? (8/6/2006 9:58:20 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Estring First, quit thinking of him as a Dom. Get to know him as a person. If he is a good person, there is a good chance he is a good Dom. I think that Estring has offered the best advice so far, along with mstrjx. I have had prospectives confront me with a list of questions they want answered. I bow out politely but quickly. To me it bespeaks such lack of confidence and social grace that I feel confident in leaving this person out of my own considerations. My friends don't tend to be the stuffy type. They are real easy to get along with, but they move through the world with certain kinds of energy and, well, social grace--even if it is often of a rough-and-ready variety. My point isn't that my friends have to approve. My point is that this is the kind of person who stimulates and interests me. I could be wrong in a given case, but there are so many lovely, stimulating prospectives out there and life is just too short to spend it laboriously turning over every rock you stumble over. How much fun is the relationship going to be if it is born in the drudgery of an interview? I would never have done this list business with a prospective vanilla partner. I would never subject a potential friend to this kind of depersonalizing, objectifying treatment. I have done it with prospective employees and I've been the job applicant too. But an employer to a great extent IS looking for a list of qualifications as much as for a person. Any sub who strikes me as primarily looking for a list of qualifications is invited to go look for it over there somewhere. What an ugly model upon which to base your efforts at a new relationship. I wonder if some people do attend vanilla first dates with these lists to fill out. Has it ever lead to a second date? I mean I can imagine it since there are all kinds of people out there. Maybe the right sort of person for you would just love being subjected to a barrage of questions in lieu of actual conversation. If so, rock on. But hell, the kind of person you most want to rule out is just the one who will be able to sit there with a straight face (or just the right kind of smile), guess what answers you want to hear and spoonfeed them to you anyway, right? Do as Estring says. Get to know the person. Take some time and let them show you who and what they are in dozens of ways--by their actions; by the sorts of subjects they choose to bring up and what they have to say about them. Does he seem incapable of self-deprecation? Are an awful lot of his stories tales of woe which were all someone elses fault? You don't need a question list with this guy. Excuse yourself politely and leave. In the mean time: is this person fun and stimulating to be with? If not, who CARES what their answer to question number 46B subsection K is? Do you really want to be taken home and strapped to the coffee table by someone who doesn't bring out the best in you at the coffee shop? I enjoy spirited conversation, light conversation, deep conversation. I enjoy engaging in activity together and just quiet time together (but not long walks on the beach or Pina Coladas!). I want to see how a person handles herself extemporaneously and I want to be DELIGHTED by it. When was the last time you delighted someone by reading from a list? As for background checks, if you don't trust your own judgement enough to choose your own associates without farming that job out to some professional service then I'm probably going to follow your example and not trust your judgement either. We can calmly agree to disagree and go our separate ways.
|
|
|
|