RE: Why is S&M intensity so bad, but boxing OK?

RE: Why is S&M intensity so bad, but boxing OK? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

WhipTheHip -> RE: Why is S&M intensity so bad, but boxing OK? (8/16/2006 5:22:23 AM)
Boxing is not okay. Bdsm is okay. Just most people don't understand it. Our society is much more friendly to violence than to sex. Look at television. You can thank Christianity for this.

KnightofMists -> RE: Why is S&M intensity so bad, but boxing OK? (8/16/2006 6:25:08 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhipTheHip Boxing is not okay. Bdsm is okay. Just most people don't understand it. Our society is much more friendly to violence than to sex. Look at television. You can thank Christianity for this. wake up and smell the coffee.... BDSM doesn't equate to sex. In fact .... the SM component is very much equated to violence. However, many incorporate Sex and their Sexuality with BDSM.... they are distinct but coexist nicely.

stef -> RE: Why is S&M intensity so bad, but boxing OK? (8/16/2006 6:36:16 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: KnightofMists wake up and smell the coffee.... BDSM doesn't equate to sex. In fact .... the SM component is very much equated to violence. You should consider switching to decaf. To the majority of the vanilla population, BDSM is just kinky sex. The reality of the situation doesn't figure into their perceptions at all. ~stef

LaTigresse -> RE: Why is S&M intensity so bad, but boxing OK? (8/16/2006 6:44:55 AM)
Not THIS part of the majority!

twicehappy -> RE: Why is S&M intensity so bad, but boxing OK? (8/16/2006 6:56:10 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LaTigresse Not THIS part of the majority! Not our parts either! Good morning beautiful.

KnightofMists -> RE: Why is S&M intensity so bad, but boxing OK? (8/16/2006 7:02:59 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: stef The reality of the situation doesn't figure into their perceptions at all. ~stef Ignorance is bliss... but in this day of knowledge... it is becoming harder and harder to stay ignorant. What outsiders percieved today is different than yesterday and will be different tomorrow. Hell... it was too long in the past that oral sex was considered a taboo of sexual interactions.. now it a part of mainstream's perception of sex. Just as society's perception of sex has changed and will continue to change... so will their perceptions of BDSM.

stef -> RE: Why is S&M intensity so bad, but boxing OK? (8/16/2006 6:00:20 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LaTigresse Not THIS part of the majority! Do you honestly consider yourself a part of the vanilla population? ~stef

marieToo -> RE: Why is S&M intensity so bad, but boxing OK? (8/16/2006 6:06:40 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: onestandingstill Why do you feel society frowns so severely on S&M contact & can accept the other intense activities? Suzanne I dont think they do. Furthermore, most bdsmers, in my view, are naive when they think that 'vanilla' people havent a clue, or condemn S and M. Id be willing to bet that most "vanillas" have experienced it at some point in their sex lives, or at least fantasize about it, or have done some 'lighter' play without even realizing its "S and M". We're not special and we didnt invent the "spankin".

WhipTheHip -> RE: Why is S&M intensity so bad, but boxing OK? (8/16/2006 6:30:16 PM)
People fear that which they don't understand and people who are different than them. Vanillia people look us, the same way some of us look at consensual-nonconsensuality or Dolcett. They think anyone into bdsm must be sick, perverted, mentally ill, and dangerous. People have all kinds of fears. They think we tie up young women against their will and beat them with chains, the way they did in the Middle ages to extract confessions. That is why I believe a R-rated documentry would be good to show how light bddsm look. Moreover, they can't understand what anyone would get out of letting another person whip them.

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125