mp072004
Posts: 381
Joined: 12/22/2005 Status: offline
|
Most relationships, including romantic relationships, involve inequal power. There doesn't have to be a bifurcation between love and inequal power. To notice the prevalence of inequal power in relationships, look around at your coupled friends--it's likely that one partner 'wears the pants', as it were. It also seems that many d/s couples, that is, people who have explicitly agreed to power inequality, have and enjoy romantic relationships, often including integration into the partners' families, owning property jointly, and marrying. The absence of high protocol doesn't necessarily signal the presence of a dominant girlfriend, though. I like a low-protocol, high-authority arrangement, where dominance means making decisions and receiving obedience, not using capital letters for first person pronouns. I also do not want a romantic d/s relationship. Honestly, if you simply want to be the subject partner in a romantic relationship, you can broaden your search and look for authoritative women who don't identify with BDSM. It's not very hard to determine whether a person perceives himself or herself as dominant to you or subject to you. I found part of your message confusing. You intend to defer to your partner, "but not without debate." If you intend to defer to her, meaning that you intend to yield to her judgments, why would you also intend to debate her, meaning that you would try to persuade her that a different conclusion would be better? Monica
|