Mercnbeth
Posts: 11766
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth Well were ALL Nazis bad? I mean, should ALL Nazis be painted with the same brush? Some parts of Mein Kampf are just taken out of context. Sure, a percentage of Nazis did do bad things and terrorized Europe but can we assume that all were terrorists? Mr Grass is a fine author, he followed his leaders dogma religiously. If the US didn't brutally bomb his homeland and kill thousands of Germany's civilians, Mr Grass would be not only a Nobel Prize winner, but elder Statesman of a world living under the dogma of his Fuhrer. And as a bonus - NO ISRAEL! They say when you have to explain your point, or your joke, it was a bad point and/or bad joke. Guilty of a bad point here I guess based upon the wondering about my Nazi membership. Let's try it this way. What if this were written this way, and the subject was the capture of bin Laden, and we hear the lawyer give this opening statement. Well were ALL Muslims bad? I mean, should ALL Muslims be painted with the same brush? Some parts of the Koran are just taken out of context. Sure, a percentage of Muslims did do bad things and terrorized Europe but can we assume that all were terrorists? Mr. Laden is a fine architect, he followed his leaders dogma religiously. If the US didn't brutally bomb his homeland and kill thousands of Arab civilians, Mr Laden would be not only a prize winning architect, but elder Statesman of a world living under the dogma of his Ayatollah. And as a bonus - NO ISRAEL! Hindsight allows us to be prejudicial against Nazis and the philosophy they represented. We are expected to be prejudicial and if we aren't our morals are questioned. Every other thing you've done is discounted. There is no rationalized excuse permitted, nor should there be. Will we need hindsight again when it comes to this group of people who have the same basic goal as Mr. Grass'? If not, help me with the distinction.
|