Email Courtesy

Email Courtesy (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

drwarren -> Email Courtesy (12/24/2004 10:38:40 PM)
Greetings all. I am new to collarme. I think this a good site, better than most because it is truly free. I have enjoyed my short time here. If I have one pet peeve, it is when folks do not reply to emails. We are all here by choice. Some are Dom/Domme, some are sub/slave. We make our own labels. I think we have to live by what me say. If someone takes the time out of their day to email you, I think it is just courtesy to return that email, even if all you have to say is, "Sorry, not interested." Just don't leave folks hanging. If it's gonna take awhile to to compose a proper response, send them a quick,"Thanks for your email- I will answer more fully soon. Please be patient." I have noticed that some have put in their journal entries that they have been inundated with email and they ask that everyone be patient while they try to answer. That's a great idea too. But, how about something you keep in cut and paste that reiterates that on a more personal level? I understand that some folks get LOTS of emails and it takes time to go through them. How long does it take to make a quick note? I don't mind getting 'Thanks, but no thanks' replies. At least I am not left hanging. I will just make a note that they aren't interested and move on. New folks join all the time. But having your hard work (and for me trying to come up with something that sounds good everytime IS hard work[8\|]) ignored, or read and ignored, is just plain demoralizing. Please, courteous replies, even if they are short and sweet and to the 'not what I wanted to hear, but ok' point? What does anyone else think?

alwayzron -> RE: Email Courtesy (12/24/2004 10:59:33 PM)
drw ... You throw a bottle into the sea .... sometimes it returns ... sometimes it doesn't. But I disagree with you .... although it would be a nice gesture ... I don't believe people are committed to replying to all e-mails. Do you open all of the mail you receive in your (Post Office) mail box? I would bet not. I've sent simple, one line e-mails to people (compliments, kudos, etc) and haven't heard back. No worries .... no sweat ... no loss.

proudsub -> RE: Email Courtesy (12/24/2004 11:00:37 PM)
You are not alone, here are just a few of the other threads on this: rudeness etiquette question regarding emails and courtesy to anyone regarding mail ...getting replies from subs gripes......

alwayzron -> RE: Email Courtesy (12/24/2004 11:10:28 PM)
You know ... we men are our own worst enemies .... I'm willing to take a guess that the e-mails drw are referring to were all sent to women. Spend 10 minutes in any chat room and you see the women inundated with IMs from the men .... even in lesbian chat rooms. And I'm sure it's the same with CM e-mails. I can't blame the women for not answering them. Of course ... some of the unbelievably retarded screen names these guys come up with are appalling. Seriously, how many of you ladies will take a guy seriously who has a screen name like "Big94U" or "Loves2LickU"?

phoenix52 -> RE: Email Courtesy (12/24/2004 11:15:24 PM)
i try and write back to everyone who takes more than a few seconds to write me, but i get a lot of mail and it is hard to answer everyone (i received 48 emails the first day my profile was up). Those charmers who write things like "nice tits" as an entire email, i do not write back. i do not wish to sound rude but if that is all they have to say to me, i have to wonder what further correspondence would have to offer. Oh, and the handful of guys that wrote me and insulted my Dom based on his profile, uh, yeah, i didn't write back to them, either. [:@]

alwayzron -> RE: Email Courtesy (12/24/2004 11:24:27 PM)
quote: charmers who write things like "nice tits" .... i do not wish to sound rude I say "tit for tat" ...... [:'(]

Moleculor -> RE: Email Courtesy (12/25/2004 1:50:02 AM)
One thing to remember is sometimes, when you write that one person who just seems "right" for you, and they don't write back... give 'em a week or so, then write again. Sometimes women just "forget" to respond due to the spam they get, or get distracted, or whatever, and a friendly reminder will make 'em respond.

GoddessJules -> RE: Email Courtesy (12/25/2004 5:53:35 AM)
Thanks drwarren for being so predictable and typical. I was just waiting for someone to start a thread on "not getting emails replied to." It is like clockwork. It isn't original. . .it isn't a new topic, proudsub pulled up a plethora of threads that already covers the topic in menstrual painstaking detail. To avoid being repetitive in the future, perhaps you might try the search feature to see if your "brand new" idea has already been covered. Sometime soon, on of your bretheren will start a thread on the ineqities of financial domination. . .and they too will believe that they have stumbled across a brand new original post idea.

Moleculor -> RE: Email Courtesy (12/25/2004 6:00:05 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: GoddessJules Thanks drwarren for being so predictable and typical. I was just waiting for someone to start a thread on "not getting emails replied to." It is like clockwork. It isn't original. . .it isn't a new topic, proudsub pulled up a plethora of threads that already covers the topic in menstrual painstaking detail. To avoid being repetitive in the future, perhaps you might try the search feature to see if your "brand new" idea has already been covered. Sometime soon, on of your bretheren will start a thread on the ineqities of financial domination. . .and they too will believe that they have stumbled across a brand new original post idea. You cold Jules? 'cuz you're trolling for flames. If everyone ran a search to see if a topic had been covered before posting, the forums would eventually cease to exist.

MizSuz -> RE: Email Courtesy (12/25/2004 6:08:44 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Moleculor quote: ORIGINAL: GoddessJules Thanks drwarren for being so predictable and typical. I was just waiting for someone to start a thread on "not getting emails replied to." It is like clockwork. It isn't original. . .it isn't a new topic, proudsub pulled up a plethora of threads that already covers the topic in menstrual painstaking detail. To avoid being repetitive in the future, perhaps you might try the search feature to see if your "brand new" idea has already been covered. Sometime soon, on of your bretheren will start a thread on the ineqities of financial domination. . .and they too will believe that they have stumbled across a brand new original post idea. You cold Jules? 'cuz you're trolling for flames. If everyone ran a search to see if a topic had been covered before posting, the forums would eventually cease to exist. I wouldn't argue with her. It's one of the reasons my contributions have diminished - rehashing what has been said so often already, although I can understand your point (forums eventually ceasing to exist). It would be novel, however, if someone researched their topic here and then added something new to the conversation. Season's Beatings,

happypervert -> RE: Email Courtesy (12/25/2004 6:26:23 AM)
quote: You cold Jules? 'cuz you're trolling for flames. Oh, the guy who says women are forgetful and get distracted so just keep writing and you'll "make 'em respond" thinks someone else is trolling for flames? That is rich! Thanks for the laugh. I don't know that Jules' idea about searching is necessarily the best way to avoid repeating a topic that has been beaten to death numerous times. But it is usually recommended that folks lurk a while and get a feeling for an on-line community, kinda like sticking a toe in the water, before jumping in. Certainly if folks do that and take the time to read some of the old posts here they'll be able to make a better first impression by chiming in on a topic when they actually have something to add to a discussion. However, when folks don't lurk and just introduce themselves with a post like this, they seem to be expecting it to cause a group hug and for everyone to get the warm and fuzzies. When that doesn't happen they go away. So in this case Jules just happened to be the first to pour a cold bucket of reality on the poster; if not her, then somebody else would have by telling him to quit whining and grow up.

afmvdp -> RE: Email Courtesy (12/25/2004 7:55:25 AM)
you're working in mixolydian scales, you're bound to be a bit off the mark.

MizSuz -> RE: Email Courtesy (12/25/2004 8:05:35 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: afmvdp you're working in mixolydian scales, you're bound to be a bit off the mark. Is that because it has a minor 7th or because it has no leadning note? [:D]

alwayzron -> RE: Email Courtesy (12/25/2004 9:10:33 AM)
afm and Suz .... it's refreshing to read posts from people who know more about music than just how to insert the CD !!!! [:)]

MizSuz -> RE: Email Courtesy (12/25/2004 9:13:28 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: alwayzron afm and Suz .... it's refreshing to read posts from people who know more about music than just how to insert the CD !!!! [:)] alwayzron: Kind of you to share. <smile> Do a search for the word "music" in the search function on the boards and you will find some pretty kewl threads and you'll be pleasantly surprised to see how many people on this board are very well versed in a plethora of music. Merry Crass Commercialism Day.

afmvdp -> RE: Email Courtesy (12/25/2004 9:55:27 AM)
I'm rather glad at least someone got that joke...I had a feeling it would be completely missed. A minor trying to act like a major with a low or absent leading note and a weak tone....sounds about right, no?

alwayzron -> RE: Email Courtesy (12/25/2004 9:57:34 AM)
.... I now know that 6 years of band-geek status and daily swirlees by the football team didn't go to waste ....

MizSuz -> RE: Email Courtesy (12/25/2004 11:34:32 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: afmvdp I'm rather glad at least someone got that joke...I had a feeling it would be completely missed. I got it. The truth is that I had to look it up to be sure, but it didn't get by me completely. It sounds dischordant to me. [:D]

MizSuz -> RE: Email Courtesy (12/25/2004 11:38:24 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: alwayzron .... I now know that 6 years of band-geek status and daily swirlees by the football team didn't go to waste .... Hey now! I consider my time spent in band and studying music to be the highlight of my public education! I certainly walked away from band with more usable skills than from any of the other classes I took. But then I didn't go to high school - so what do I know?

krikket -> RE: Email Courtesy (12/25/2004 12:30:43 PM)
At my age and location, i don't get a lot of e-mails, and have come to accept that as just fact. While i do try to write back to those who do take the time, there are those i ignore -- those with porno pics attached, those who's email says.."hello", noting else, including no profile, and i even received an empty one once..lol. The other letters i don't answer are the response letters to my "no thank you" letters, demanding and/or whining to know why not (rolling of eyes). i have to admit i'm sometimes tempted to write back offering them some cheese to go with their whine, but better manners prohit me..lol. As for the letters i've started, i'm learned that not everyone does write back -- lack of time, aptitude or manners are my usual self-reasonings. Who knows, i just know it's important to do my best, and not worry about the rest.. good luck..and cheers jimini

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125