Chaingang
Posts: 1727
Joined: 10/24/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Chaingang What you have to consider is how this plays out in another few years. Remember Jose Padilla? The American "enemy combatant" held without due process of law. Well, once upon a time he was front page news too. Remember how he was building a "dirty bomb" and how everyone was scared shitless for fear of airborn plutonium? Here's the update: --- None of the original allegations put forward by the U.S. government three years ago, the claims that held Padilla in the majority in solitary confinement throughout that period, were part of the indictment: "Attorney General Alberto Gonzales announced Padilla is being removed from military custody and charged with a series of crimes" and "There is no mention in the indictment of Padilla's alleged plot to use a dirty bomb in the United States. There is also no mention that Padilla ever planned to stage any attacks inside the country. And there is no direct mention of Al-Qaeda. Instead the indictment lays out a case involving five men who helped raise money and recruit volunteers in the 1990s to go overseas to countries including Chechnya, Bosnia, Somalia and Kosovo. Padilla, in fact, appears to play a minor role in the conspiracy. He is accused of going to a jihad training camp in Afghanistan but the indictment offers no evidence he ever engaged in terrorist activity." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/José_Padilla_(alleged_terrorist) Well, here's the update on the update: "Judge drops Padilla terror charge" http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/08/21/padilla.charge/index.html?section=cnn_topstories MIAMI, Florida (CNN) -- A federal judge in Miami on Monday dismissed the lead terror count against Jose Padilla, the U.S. citizen once identified as a "dirty bomb" suspect and detained as an "enemy combatant." ----- What I personally find interesting about the case is how the federal government attempted to and was partially successful in denying a U.S. citizen his constitutional rights. If the guy's a terrorist, AQ or homegrown is irrelevant to me, I say let's nail his balls to the wall. What I don't understand is why we have to deny any citizen their constitutional rights to achieve such an objective. Isn't there a means to do so in a perfectly legitimate and above board manner? I get really tired of the bullshit antics of this administration. Do they have any legitimate claims they can make to support their idiotic, dangerous, and costly policies? That's a rhetorical question for those not knowing. The answer is a resounding "No!"
_____________________________
"Everything flows, nothing stands still." (Πάντα ῥεῖ καὶ οὐδὲν μένει) - Heraclitus
|