TreSwank
Posts: 1165
Joined: 3/5/2005 Status: offline
|
After a six-month period of being employed part-time at a local gay-friendly booze joint, and indulging himself in his usual mercurial, unfocused, and haphazard research, TreSwank has arrived at yet another arbitrary conclusion to an issue that most folks would rather leave alone than pick at like a raw, fluid-swollen pustule. I LOVE gay men, in much of the same way that I love the great outdoors, picturesque sunsets, smiling children, and dirty, raw, primal copulation with fat-assed women. The big issue that separates alot of homophobes and homo-friendlies is simply this little question: IS HOMOSEXUALITY AN INBORN CHARACTERISTIC, OR A LEARNED TRAIT? (Note to readers: In this post, I'll be mostly referring to the sexual orientation of MEN. Women's sexuality is far too fluid for me to grab my trusty machete and tread down dubious paths of "female bisexuality" and "ideological lesbianism") Animal research has PROVEN that male mice whose prenatal hormone exposure levels are altered, will demonstrate the phenomenon of lordosis (the female copulatory position) when in the presence of other males. These same biologically-altered mice, will demonstrate behaviors that epitomize those of the female gender among their species. Now.........to draw a parallel, and to make an intuitive leap from behavioral patterns in mice to my own personal empirical observations of the gay community (Sweet Jesus, am I stretching it or what?), most "flaming" effeminate men that I've befriended openly identify themselves as "bottoms", which are, the passive (or not so passive) recipients of anal intercourse. I think that there is a very distinct possibility that "feminine" gay men are those fellows whose homosexuality is caused by an unusual prenatal dosing of those chemicals that control gender traits. "But what about the uber-masculine gay men who don't lisp, or possess ungodly, runway-worthy color-coordination? What about those sexy hairsute trucker bears, or muscle boys?" I'll cite two separate theories for this. The first is that some "masculine" gay men actually possess a gene that makes them gay. In a strange, biologically random world where babies can emerge from their mother's womb possessing both male and female genitalia, I don't think that it's a far stretch to believe that a gay gene just simply "exists". CONTROVERSIAL THEORY #2 Amongst the gay community, I've very unfortunately, met a WAY DISPROPORTIONATE amount of masculine homosexual men who claimed to have been molested by male figures as children. I believe that a seasoned pedophile, like an adept wild predator in it's natural habitat, will seek out prey that displays certain vulnerable qualities, and that the children who display these weak-points have undeveloped aspects of their personality which are so malleable, as to make them extremely impressionable to psychic attacks, such as molestation. The trauma of the defining event thus bends their personality to forever equate sexual intercourse with men. There you have it folks. I probably could have summarized this rambling post into the sentence: "I believe that most male homosexuality is genetic, while some is caused by sexual trauma", but that just ain't TreSwank's style. Kudos, and hugs and kisses to all the gay men out there in CollarMe. After years of suffering in the dark, I believe that things might actually get better for you. For thousands of fucking years, gay men have been reviled, killed and humiliated by bigots and hatemongers. It's about time that you had the chance to live without fear.
< Message edited by TreSwank -- 8/13/2006 9:48:53 PM >
|