|
LadyHugs -> RE: What's so fun about feminisation? (8/14/2006 8:37:10 PM)
|
Dear LordDarkPleasure, Ladies and Gentlemen;
Personally, as much as I like the individuals for who they are inside, I am not inclined to have a sissy male or femme male in my service. Being a lady, I prefer male gentlemen in service to me. I am very capable of finding ladies to serve me, should I seek a female.
That said, I will add that a good many men who cross-dress, fetish dress in women's clothing, may be into female dressing long before they even come across to a female dominant. With rare exceptions, men who dress in female garb, are so caught up in their own sensations and looks, that service is not what is a result, even though they 'seek' to serve. Most times it is an audience they seek to see how fine they are in female garb. Rare do you find a man who dresses in female fetish or female garb, that actually works hard to serve.
In the European countries, during the reign of Queen Victoria, the term to discipline men and boys were to have them dress, with wigs, female garb from undergarments to dresses was called "peticoating."
Not only was it discipline/punishment but, was to put these naughty men/boys into a position as to suffer what women/girls had to endure by their actions. In short, to give them a 'taste' of their own medicine, per se.
History has many gentlemen in female attire throughout history, such as ancient Japanese theater, some Vaudville acts, some acts during Shakespeare's time were all done by males, in female roles as well. So, it wasn't always a source of humiliation but, an art form.
For those who practice the Victorian form/style of their M/s or D/s relationship, it may be more practiced as a punishment rather than a fetish.
Respectfully submitted for consideration,
Lady Hugs
|
|
|
|
