CreativeDominant
Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: SusanofO I am wondering this because I've read many times on this board how some people think a bdsm relationship is more "honest" than others they've had. I can see where this might be true, because "roles" might be more concretely defined, and "expectations" are maybe clearly stated in advance, etc. - and this certainly isn't the case in many "vanilla" relationships, I imagine (although then again - maybe it is, I don't know). I also seem to read many posts where someone has really almost destroyed someone else with their misbehavior within a bdsm relationship, and one person (or both), have been so completely emotionally vulnerable within it, that this has left them seemingly devastated (maybe because it is a bdsm relationship, where emotions can be laid more "bare" than in some others - least I think that potential is certainly there for that to happen, than in some "vanilla" relationships). So - I am left thinking that - simply because a bdsm relationship might contain more clearly defined roles, or more clearly stated expectations than a vanilla relationship, that if you're in one with someone who has "issues", or perhaps is simply not seeking what another person might be looking for, that a relationship is not necessarily any more ill-fated, or likewise, suited for happiness, than any non-bdsm relationship. Any thoughts? Are bdsm relationships "healthier" simply because they might have the capacity to be more "honest", or does this matter if the people involved simply aren't "on the same page"? Thanks for the replies. I don't feel that they are. I think that a D/s relationship in which the partners commit to the "honesty, communication, respect" and then follow through on that commitment as part of the recognition within themselves and each other that these are credos not just for dominants and submissives but responsible human beings within a relationship is a healthier relationship than a vanilla one in which these commitments to each other are not even under consideration anymore let alone carried through. But...I think that the same would hold true for any vanilla relationship in which you find commitment and carry-through of these credos in comparison to a D/s relationship in which they are simply words mouthed for the sake of the role and not believed in or followed through. For me as a person involved in a D/s relationship, I want those responsibilities of those commitments to honesty, communication and respect. Do I feel that they help to define my role as a dominant? Sure, I do. But I always did believe in them as being a valuable part of any relationship I was in. Have I fallen down on my commitment to them? Yep. And each time I've fallen down, I've picked myself up...kicked myself around...learned some more about myself...and tried harder the next time. I am human...as are others. Some are more committed each time to learning and trying harder. For some, it is just a matter of "got caught this time...now to figure out a way to better "work it" next time". Others may think they are more committed and have learned something until faced with something that scares them about having to follow through on the responsibility of following one or all of them. That comes down to human failure or human success and while your choice to follow through as a dominant or submissive would/should may come into play, many times it comes down what you, as the basic you, chooses to do.
|