LadyEllen
Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006 From: Stourport-England Status: offline
|
MC - another excellent point. So why is it that some immigrant populations integrate and function in wider society, but some dont? Jews, not to mention Irish and hosts of others pre-war, have integrated into British society it seems to me. Sure, they retain their cultures and religions, and tend to cluster a little, but one seems to find them participating in society at all levels, living dispersed in the general population and not wholly isolated with their own. I also see some evidence of Hindus and especially Sikhs starting to do the same now that they are on the 3rd or 4th generation - moving out of the clusters and assimilating. I think it has to do with the reason you mentioned - economic activity and prosperity, and knowing some Hindu and Sikh families, that stems from the educational and professional aspirations of the previous generation; the encouragement (pressure) put on Hindu and Sikh children by their parents to attain A levels and degrees and to become doctors, lawyers, accountants etc is incredible. These people tend to achieve highly, enabling them to move out of the ghetto and ensuring in many ways that they assimilate and integrate, quite apart from the fact that in order to achieve in the education stakes the children have to learn English well. Meanwhile, whilst I do not want this to turn into another Islam bashing thread, and its by no means unknown in Muslim communities for the same pressures to be put on children, your point about the Bangladeshi community in London should not go unnoted. I heard a statistic a month or so ago that said that the single largest group of men by ethnicity, out of work and on benefits is Muslims. This could be racism applied by employers of course, but to be frank, most employers dont know the difference between a Hindu, Sikh or Muslim from the ISC, so this is unlikely. Is it those parents (of all immigrant communities, not just Muslim) who lack aspiration or will to participate in our foreign society, who are in effect perpetuating the problem I wonder? Is it that they find our way of life so downright disagreeable that they insist on importing and retaining everything from their lands and cultures of origin? If so, then what on earth are they doing here I wonder? Why are they so unable to see that they must accomodate to the UK at least as much as the UK accomodates to them? I still think we need something to provide unification and common loyalties, but MC's point is well taken. Integration is dependent on engagement and the aspiration to integrate to wider society. E
|