julietsierra -> RE: Contacting Dominants (9/19/2006 2:19:30 AM)
|
Ok..after reading all the posts in this thread, the one thing that keeps going through my mind is that if someone is going to turn down someone else's advances - no matter how well or poorly worded they are - they have no right, or even justification for offering all that "constructive criticism." It's simply not their place to do so. Furthermore, taking the whole conversation public on top of it - in what I can only surmise to be an attempt to further insult her, or, God forbid, be garnering support for his actions - is pretty whiney in its own right. Sometimes it is very tempting to add a couple of rejoinders in response e-mails - especially when their mode of address when making first contact sets off pet peeves of ours, but even so, in the end, if you're saying "no thank you," then your justification for whatever other "constructive criticism" you may think to offer is moot as well. I also have significant issues with the OP's knee jerk reaction being toward that illusive idea that "submissives are dealing in female superiority" just because she took offense to that "helpful criticism" line. To me, with my obvious superiority issues (I'm submissive; I'm female, so I obviously must think I'm superior, right?), I'm thinking this smacks of something quite different from constructive criticism, and is not at all complimentary of the dominant that issued it. I find it very interesting that the OP felt it was appropriate to call her stupid in a private post, and when she reacted to this, to call her stupid again - in a public forum - and ask other people to join in and call her stupid as well. I keep getting this image of high school, where disagreements were "settled" by getting as many people as you could to agree with you. I have to ask myself why was it so necessary for him to need all this public affirmation of his actions, and why he felt so darn superior in his own right that he felt "obliged" to offer up his oh-so-constructive criticism in the first place. juliet
|
|
|
|