philosophy
Posts: 5284
Joined: 2/15/2004 Status: offline
|
"But I can't see how a private company concerned with profit could wield a better army. The bottom line in the military is to win, not make money." ......like a health service is there to look after peoples health and not make money? Sorry but given your posts on other threads that argument is sheer hypocrisy.... "I earned the right, like many fellow comrades in arms to bitch, moan, and groan about what is wrong." ...what? and nurses, teachers etc have no right to analyse social situations? "If your not willing to stand up when it gets tough, then you do not deserve the right to enjoy the fruits of everyone elses labor when times are a plenty." ...there are lots of ways to stand up, weilding a firearm is just one of them. "I'm all in favor of mandatory national service. I'd like to see a strictly non-military option though. An updated version of the Civilian Conservation Corps that does all sorts of hard, dangerous work in awful conditions for far less pay and worse treatment than those who choose a Combat arm. I wonder how many protester types would put the money where the mouth is." ..again with the military-good, nurses and teachers-less good argument. Would a soldier make a better teacher of 5 year olds than a primary school teacher? Would a munitions specialist make a better nurse than someone who has trained for it? And why stop at national service when you want to put a division in society.....make all teachers and nurses work for minimum wage and use the savings to double soldiers pay. ...and if anyone complains, well the better off people will be armed........
|