CrappyDom
Posts: 1883
Joined: 4/11/2006 From: Sacramento Status: offline
|
The parallels are in how the British, through either incompetence, lack of oversight, or vengefulness often reignited the dying flame of the revolution. Those are the most stunning and clear ones. They never make direct comparisons, but some of the themes and slogans of Bush and Cheney are included from the British side, although in subtly modified form. A number of times they forced people who were otherwise uninterested, to choose sides and they did, much to the chagrin of the Brits! The deBaathification was similar fuckup. Early on they were fighting in New Jersey and the Brits were not getting the support from the Colonists (who weren't doing anything to help Washington either) and rather than take that as a chance to win them to their side by paying high prices for supplies, instead simply took them by force, thus ensuring new recruits for Washington. Sound familiar? A theme running throughout the whole series is the British did not have enough men and could not secure the country and so Washington's tiny and ineffective army was able to move about and survive. None of this is news to anyone familiar with guerilla warfare and the tactics of both sides but since most people identify with the American revolutionaries it makes for an interesting cognitive dissonance to see it from that side rather than the side of the occupyer that we are in now.
|