SirDiscipliner69 -> RE: Domination regardless of sexual persuasion? (9/11/2006 6:09:22 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: TopCurious0 quote:
ORIGINAL: SirDiscipliner69 If a Dominant was truly dominant shouldn't he enjoy dominating anyone regardless of his sexual persuasion or that of the submissive of either sex simply for the pleasure of dominating? Should sexual dominating of any given submissive be as equally pleasurable regardless of the Dominant's sexual persuasion or that of the submissive? If a driver was truly a driver shouldn't he enjoy driving any vehicle regardless of its style, performance or state of maintanance purely for the sake of driving? Should driving any vehicle be equally fun regardless of the drivers preferences? (SUVs make me feel like I'm going to flip every time I make a turn) More seriously, what is 'truly dominent'? and what does one get out of the process? If one enjoys the power trip for its own sake, then I suspect so. For me, I very much enjoy the melding of lust, desire, and control. I find sexualized tension different from normal tension. That may mean your answer is no, or it may be that I don't qualify under your definition of 'truly dominent'. Given I suspect I will never play or get involved with you, I don't really care if I do or don't fit that definition anyway, as long as I know what I want and enjoy and can communicate clearly with the people I want to share the experiance with. Orientations meshing is one precondition for my enjoyment, but it is by no means the only one. Interesting analogy...drivers and cars...I have often described a submissive a vehicle of My pleasure...guess it just matters how many miles I get.. ;) I believe in adapting what works for Myself... I do enjoy reading other's perceptions as in doing so it may offer new perceptions of My own. Ross
|
|
|
|