RE: Conspiracy Phreak Update (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message

StrongButKind -> RE: Conspiracy Phreak Update (9/13/2006 11:10:26 PM)

The tenant lists for the other towers were similar. You're quite right that a lot of interesting and valuable things were destroyed -- we'll probably never know the extent of it.

WTC 7 was hit by falling debris from the collapse of the towers. NIST's preliminary reports say as much as 25% of the thickness of the building was destroyed by debris over an area of ten stories or so.



UtopianRanger -> RE: Controlled demolition (9/14/2006 1:02:10 AM)

quote:

 Our governments don't blow up our own buildings and kill innocent people. I bet in your world they do.


They don't, huh? They've sure talked about it before....and in an official capacity, yes.

What about Operation Northwoods - That's not a conspiracy theory by any stretch of the imagination. Those declassified documents prove beyond a shadow of doubt that our government was / is quite capable of drafting up a plan for the implementation of false flag operations that would kill and maim innocent civilians for the sole purpose of generating support from a wide-spectrum of the populace for military intervention against another nation-state.

Now, even though it was never implemented....it should scare the hell out of you and make you think twice about the fact that we have a contingent of officials in supreme positions of authority who are that diabolical that they would be willing to kill /maim our own civilians under pretense that their ends justifies their means.

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/northwoods.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods



 - R



Chaingang -> RE: Controlled demolition (9/14/2006 4:43:28 AM)

We waste our words as the beauty of pearls are wasted if you cast them before swine.

The people will that not open their minds to alternate theories are the same kind of people that believe in the "Magic Bullet" - and if that BS story were true there would be no point in maintaining a seal on records now over 40 years old. The "alleged criminal" senior was in Dallas that day on behalf of the CIA.

That's right - the government is your friend. The government would never do anything to hurt you. Give up your guns. Allow the surveillance cameras into your houses. Those RFID tags will only hurt for a few days once implanted. The government will keep you safe from harm. Go back to sleep. There's nothing for you to see here...



CrappyDom -> RE: Controlled demolition (9/14/2006 6:45:15 AM)

Chaingang,

Give me a break, don't get all pissy because we don't buy YOUR story.  You are talking about Manhatten, there isn't a building their that doesn't house important/powerful firms.

As for Bush and a 1960's connection to the CIA, that IS one I believe and I sure as hell don't think Oswald was the lone shooter, but my money goes to Hoover and the mob being behind the hit.



Chaingang -> RE: Controlled demolition (9/14/2006 7:03:56 AM)

I am not stating anything about 9/11 as a fact, I am entirely open to all info as it comes in. My point is that I haven't closed the book on the subject as many seem to have done.

Eternal vigilance.



SirKenin -> RE: Controlled demolition (9/14/2006 8:08:49 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaingang

We waste our words as the beauty of pearls are wasted if you cast them before swine.

The people will that not open their minds to alternate theories are the same kind of people that believe in the "Magic Bullet"


That is because there is absolutely no substance to your alternate theories.  Man, it is easily proven that they are a bunch of shit.  I proved in this thread that the towers came down for a very logical reason.  That is the very crux of these crap conspiracy theories....so why should we waste our time believing them, never mind listening to them?



stef -> RE: Conspiracy Phreak Update (9/14/2006 1:11:57 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: NastyDaddy

OMG..... anybody notice that sissygirl showed up right after jessica's posts started saying:  [Awaiting Approval]

Indeed, a conspiracy of one....  [:D] 

Sissifytoserve was here under another name long before the jessyka entities showed up but it's certainly possible that they could be the same person (or perhaps alters sharing the same meat).  Check out his previous posts under the name Sissyslave71 for more fun and frivolity.

~stef



sissifytoserve -> RE: Conspiracy Phreak Update (9/14/2006 2:05:42 PM)

Attack...attack...attack...the poster for DARING to question anything that the government didn't approve!!!!

How dare you question authority!!! Shame!!

Attack!! The poster!!! Don't debate the facts....just PERSONALLY attack him!!!!


Uh huh.

I see where this is headed.



LotusSong -> RE: Conspiracy Phreak Update (9/14/2006 2:34:18 PM)

What is this new weapon we now have that involves emitting energy waves to disable people?
 
Our government stated that they would use it on OUR people first (as in riot control).. because "we won't use anything on our enemies that we wouldn't use on our own people".  Did anyone ELSE catch this on the news yesterday??



sissifytoserve -> RE: Conspiracy Phreak Update (9/14/2006 2:38:11 PM)

One of them is called an LRAD.


Read about it here.


http://www.defense-update.com/products/l/LRAD.htm


The other is a focused MICROVAVE beam weapon that literally HEATS your skin and causes pain.


http://www.defensetech.org/archives/002035.html


Got to keep the LITTLE PEOPLE in line and obedient to the state afterall.


Baaaaaaa.....Baaaaaaaa







WyrdRich -> RE: Conspiracy Phreak Update (9/14/2006 2:38:55 PM)

        Sissify,

     I love a good conspiracy theory but this one isn't good.  My God, CrappyDom and I are agreeing with each other (mostly), that should tell you how far out into wackiness this is.

     Crappy,

      Do you happen to know the names of the ships that were being used for the Bay of Pigs invasion?



sissifytoserve -> RE: Conspiracy Phreak Update (9/14/2006 2:43:15 PM)

Yes....

It was an AIR FORCE official in fact.

He called anyone who protests the war (a fundemental constitutional right) a "mob".

Probably will be labeled as "terrorists" next.


Heres the article.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/09/12/usaf.weapons.ap/index.html

Its official.....its OKAY to experiment on the American people.

Not that they haven't been doing that for years already.

They are just going public about it.




I know the government huggers here will try to rationalize this and say its ok.

Untill it happens to THEM...they don't care.




LotusSong -> RE: Conspiracy Phreak Update (9/14/2006 2:44:27 PM)

Thanks for the links, Sissify.  You know.. It's almost conceivable that someday we will willingly go into a disintigraation chamber when the computer estimates how many people died in an estimated attack.  Remember that one Star Trek episode?




sissifytoserve -> RE: THE REAL TRUTH (9/14/2006 2:50:27 PM)

Truth IS stranger than fiction.




SirKenin -> RE: THE REAL TRUTH (9/14/2006 5:03:24 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: sissifytoserve

Truth IS stranger than fiction.




Let us worry about that when you elevate yourself to the status of truth.



LadyJulieAnn -> RE: Conspiracy Phreak Update (9/14/2006 5:25:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LotusSong

What is this new weapon we now have that involves emitting energy waves to disable people?
 
Our government stated that they would use it on OUR people first (as in riot control).. because "we won't use anything on our enemies that we wouldn't use on our own people".  Did anyone ELSE catch this on the news yesterday??


The people weren't disabled and the tests were done on volunteers.  The only issue stated in sissifytoserve's link was that the testing was not as realistic as it could have been.  They took safety measures to protect the volunteers during the tests in case something went wrong. 

Be well,
Julie



sissifytoserve -> RE: Conspiracy Phreak Update (9/14/2006 5:29:11 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyJulieAnn



The people weren't disabled and the tests were done on volunteers. The only issue stated in sissifytoserve's link was that the testing was not as realistic as it could have been. They took safety measures to protect the volunteers during the tests in case something went wrong.

Be well,
Julie



Yup....

Gives the government Carte Blanche to do other "Experiments" on us as well.

I guess thats OKAY for some people.

I 100% DIS-agree.



sissifytoserve -> The REAL truth (9/14/2006 5:30:51 PM)

.........but back on topic.


Alex Jones on Controlled Demolition in World Trade Center Building 7


http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8695130819141155641&q=alex+jones+WTC+7



StrongButKind -> RE: The REAL truth (9/14/2006 11:39:37 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: sissifytoserve

.........but back on topic.


Alex Jones on Controlled Demolition in World Trade Center Building 7


http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8695130819141155641&q=alex+jones+WTC+7


Have you read those reports yet? I keep reading/watching your references, and there's nothing new, that isn't covered in more credible sources. This is a radio host whose career is based on selling conspiracy theory books. His opinion on structural engineering is roughly as useful as George Bush's. Do you have anything from a credible source? Thanks.



Chaingang -> RE: The REAL truth (9/15/2006 12:54:55 AM)

Larry Silverstein from PBS program "America Rebuilds":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6ufakK2fIc

What is the meaning of the term "pull" in this context?



Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125