HR635 = Bush investigation/impeachment (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


sissifytoserve -> HR635 = Bush investigation/impeachment (9/17/2006 6:39:53 PM)

House of Rep.HR635 to Investigate Bush Adm.and Recommend Impeachment

The Library of Congress

Be it Resolved, That there is hereby established in the House of
Representatives a select committee to be known as the Select Committee
on Administration Predetermination to Go to War and... (Introduced in
House)
HRES 635 IH

Search Results - THOMAS (Library of Congress)

Address:http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:H.RES.635:

109th CONGRESS
1st Session

H. RES. 635
Creating a select committee to investigate
the Administration's intent to go to war before congressional
authorization, manipulation of pre-war intelligence, encouraging and
countenancing torture, retaliating against critics, and to make
recommendations regarding grounds for possible impeachment.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Congressman CONYERS submitted the following resolution; which was
referred to the Committee on Rules
RESOLUTION
Creating a select committee to investigate the
Administration's intent to go to war before congressional authorization,
manipulation of pre-war intelligence, encouraging and countenancing
torture, retaliating against critics, and to make recommendations
regarding grounds for possible impeachment.
Resolved,
That there is hereby established in the House of
Representatives a select committee to be known as the Select Committee
on Administration Predetermination to Go to War and Manipulation of
Intelligence (in this resolution referred to as the `Select
Committee´).
PURPOSES AND FUNCTIONS
SEC. 2. (a) The Select Committee is authorized and directed to
investigate all relevant government agencies actions and decisions
relating to the Administration's intent to go to war before
congressional authorization, manipulation of pre-war intelligence,
encouraging and countenancing torture, and retaliating against critics,
including:
(1) actions by the White House, National
Security Council, Department of State, Department of Defense, and
Central Intelligence Agency related to United Nations and Iraq Survey
Group inspections of Iraq;
(2) knowledge of Iraq's ability regarding and
intentions toward, or lack of ability regarding or intentions toward,
nuclear weapons capability;
(3) knowledge regarding Iraq's possession of or
attempted possession of, or regarding the lack of possession of or
attempted possession of, chemical or biological weapons;
(4) knowledge of Iraq's possession of aluminum
tubes for conventional rocket programs or for nuclear weapons
development;
(5) knowledge regarding Iraq's intent, or lack
of intent, toward acquiring yellowcake uranium from Niger;
(6) knowledge of any involvement, or lack of
involvement, by Iraq in the September 11, 2001, attacks against the
United States;
(7) knowledge of any connections or ties, or of
any lack of connections or ties, between Iraq and al Qaeda;
(8) knowledge of any meeting, or lack of any
meeting, between Iraqi intelligence officials and Mohammed Atta in
Prague, Czechoslovakia;
(9) preparations for detention, interrogation
and treatment of detainees, or lack thereof, made in the planning stages
of the Iraq conflict prior to March 19, 2003;
(10) knowledge of abuses and mistreatment of
detainees during the Iraq conflict after March 19, 2003;
(11) the investigation of abuses and
mistreatment, or lack thereof, the results of these investigations, any
sanctions or punishment of offenders, and any efforts to keep these
reports either from supervisors, officials or the public;
(12) an examination of all prison facilities,
including the High Value Detainee facility at Baghdad airport and secret
prisons or `black sites,´ for detaining individuals outside the United
States;
(13) the extent to which civilian, military, or
intelligence officials expressly authorized, willingly ignored, or
created an atmosphere that condoned the abuses and mistreatment that
occurred at Abu Ghraib, Iraq; and
(14) knowledge on the part of any White House
officials of the covert identity of Valerie Plame Wilson and any
discussion or communication by such officials with members of the media
about such identity, and any failure to enforce Executive Order 12958.
APPOINTMENT AND MEMBERSHIP
SEC. 3. (a) Members- The Select Committee shall be composed of 20
Members of the House to be appointed by the Speaker, of whom--
(1) 10 Members shall be appointed upon the recommendation of the
minority leader as set forth below;
(2) 1 Member he shall designate as chairman;
(3) 1 Member he shall designate, upon the recommendation of the minority
leader, as vice chairman.
(4) 4 Members shall sit on the Committee on the Judiciary, of whom
2shall be appointed upon the recommendation of the minority leader;
(5) 4 Members shall sit on the Committee on International Relations, of
whom 2 shall be appointed upon the recommendation of the minority
leader;
(6) 4 Members shall sit on the Permanent Select Committee on
Intelligence, of whom 2 shall be appointed upon the recommendation of
the minority leader;
(7) 4 Members shall sit on the Committee on Government Reform, of whom 2
shall be appointed upon the recommendation of the minority leader; and
(8) 4 Members shall sit on the Committee on Armed Services, of whom 2
shall be appointed upon the recommendation of the minority leader.
(b) Vacancies- Any vacancy occurring in the membership of the Select
Committee shall be filled in the same manner in which the original
appointment was made.
(c) For purposes of this section, the term `Member´ means any
Representative in, or Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, the House of
Representatives.
POWERS OF SELECT COMMITTEE
SEC. 4. (a) In General-
(1) HEARINGS AND EVIDENCE- The Select Committee or, on the authority of
the Select Committee, any subcommittee or member thereof, may, for the
purpose of carrying out this resolution--
(A) hold such hearings and sit and act at such times and places, take
such testimony, receive such evidence, administer such oaths; and
(B) subject to paragraph (2)(A), require, by subpoena or otherwise, the
attendance and testimony of such witnesses and the production of such
books, records, correspondence, memoranda, papers, and documents, as the
Select Committee or such designated subcommittee or designated member
may determine advisable, including but not limited to--
(i) White House documents (e.g., memoranda, e-mails, notes of phone
calls, handwritten notes);
(ii) Department of Defense documents;
(iii) Department of Justice materials;
(iv) Department of State documents;
(v) Central Intelligence Agency analyses; (vi) Defense Intelligence
Agency analyses; (vii) National Security Council memoranda; and (viii)
Special Counsel Patrick Fitgzerald's notes, grand jury materials, and
other evidence collected or created as part of the CIA leak
investigation.
(2) SUBPOENAS-
(A) ISSUANCE-
(i) IN GENERAL- A subpoena may be issued under this section only--
(I) by the agreement of the chairman and the vice chairman; or (II) by
the affirmative vote of 10 members of the Select Committee. (ii)
SIGNATURE- Subject to clause (i), subpoenas issued under this subsection
may be issued under the signature of the chairman or any member
designated by a majority of the Select Committee, and may be served by
any person designated by the chairman or by a member designated by a
majority of the Select Committee.
(B) ENFORCEMENT-
(i) IN GENERAL- In the case of contumacy or failure to obey a subpoena
issued under subsection (a), the United States district court for the
judicial district in which the subpoenaed person resides, is served, or
may be found, or where the subpoena is returnable, may issue an order
requiring such person to appear at any designated place to testify or to
produce documentary or other evidence. Any failure to obey the order of
the court may be punished by the court as a contempt of that court.
(ii) ADDITIONAL ENFORCEMENT- In the case of any failure of any witness
to comply with any subpoena or to testify when summoned under authority
of this section, the Select Committee may, by majority vote, certify a
statement of fact constituting such failure to the appropriate United
States attorney, who may bring the matter before the grand jury for its
action, under the same statutory authority and procedures as if the
United States attorney had received a certification under sections 102
through 104 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (2 U.S.C. 192
through 194).
(b) Contracting- The Select Committee may, to such extent and in such
amounts as are provided in appropriation Acts, enter into contracts to
enable the Select Committee to discharge its duties under this
resolution.
(c) Information From Federal Agencies-
(1) IN GENERAL- The Select Committee is authorized to secure directly
from any executive department, bureau, agency, board, commission,
office, independent establishment, or instrumentality of the Government,
information, suggestions, estimates, and statistics for the purposes of
this resolution. Each department, bureau, agency, board, commission,
office, independent establishment, or instrumentality shall, to the
extent authorized by law, furnish such information, suggestions,
estimates, and statistics directly to the select committee, upon request
made by the chairman, the chairman of any subcommittee created by a
majority of the Select Committee, or any member designated by a majority
of the Select Committee.
(2) RECEIPT, HANDLING, STORAGE, AND DISSEMINATION- Information shall
only be received, handled, stored, and disseminated by members of the
Select Committee and its staff consistent with all applicable statutes,
regulations, and Executive orders.
(d) Assistance From Federal Agencies-
(1) GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION- The Administrator of General
Services shall provide to the Select Committee on a reimbursable basis
administrative support and other services for the performance of the
Select Committee's functions.
(2) OTHER DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES- In addition to the assistance
prescribed in paragraph (1), departments and agencies of the United
States may provide to the Select Committee such services, funds,
facilities, staff, and other support services as they may determine
advisable and as may be authorized by law.
(e) Gifts- The Select Committee may accept, use, and dispose of gifts or
donations of services or property.
(f) Postal Services- The Select Committee may use the United States
mails in the same manner and under the same conditions as departments
and agencies of the United States.
ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS
SEC. 5. (a) Subject to the adoption of expenses resolutions as required
by clause 5 of rule XI of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the
Select Committee may incur expenses in connection with its functions
under this resolution.
(b) In carrying out its functions under this resolution, the Select
Committee, is authorized to--
(1) appoint, either on permanent basis or as experts or consultants,
such staff as the Select Committee considers necessary;
(2) prescribe the duties and responsibilities of such staff;
(3) fix the compensation of such staff at a single per annum gross rate
which does not exceed the highest rate of basic pay, as in effect from
time to time, of level V of the Executive Schedule in section 5316 of
title 5, United States Code;
(4) terminate the employment of any such staff as the Select Committee
considers appropriate; and,
(5) reimburse members of the Select Committee and of its staff for
travel, subsistence, and other necessary expenses incurred by them in
the performance of their duties and responsibilities for the Select
Committee, other than expenses in connection with any meeting of the
Select Committee, or a subcommittee thereof, held in the District of
Columbia.
(c) The Select Committee and all authority granted in this resolution
shall expire 30 days after the filing of the report of the Select
Committee with the House.
REPORTS OF SELECT COMMITTEE
SEC. 6. (a) The Select Committee shall report to the House as soon as
practicable during the present Congress, but not later than six months
after the date of passage of this resolution, the results of its
investigation and study, together with such recommendations as it deems
advisable. The Select Committee shall report to the Committee on the
Judiciary as soon as practicable during the present Congress, but not
later than six months after the date of passage of this resolution, of
any substantial and credible information which such Select Committee
receives in carrying out its responsibilities that may constitute
grounds for possible impeachment.
(b) Any such report which is made when the House is not in session shall
be filed with the Clerk of the House.
(c) Any such report shall be referred to the committee or committees
which have jurisdiction over the subject matter thereof.
(d) The records, files, and materials of the Select Committee shall be
transferred to the Clerk of the House but, if the report of the Select
Committee is referred to only one committee under the provisions of
subsection (c), the records, files, and materials of the Select
Committee shall be transferred instead to the committee to which the
final report is referred.




MrDiscipline44 -> RE: HR635 = Bush investigation/impeachment (9/17/2006 8:12:51 PM)

You couldn't just post the link? [:D]




Termyn8or -> RE: HR635 = Bush investigation/impeachment (9/17/2006 10:11:50 PM)

Not gonna pass.

T




LadyEllen -> RE: HR635 = Bush investigation/impeachment (9/18/2006 4:22:59 AM)

I just hope they dont cock it up like they did with our Georgie Galloway. Mind you, our George is a very different guy to Dubya; Galloway could probably defend himself against God if the situation arose, and still win.
E




Sinergy -> RE: HR635 = Bush investigation/impeachment (9/18/2006 10:06:56 AM)

Hello A/all,

The ironic thing is this bill might pass.  Look at all the congressmen and senators who now realize that passing the resolution to invade Iraq was the doom of their career.  This is one way to capitalize on Monkeyboy's unpopularity in this country and use it to regain the high ground.

Unlike Nixon, Monkeyboy is not bright enough to resign so Cheney can pardon him.  So what might end up happening is he is investigated and criminal charges are filed, and whoever gets elected in 2008 may tell him to rot in jail.

If he is especially lucky, maybe he will rot in jail at Gitmo. 

Just me, could be wrong, etc.

Sinergy




KenDckey -> RE: HR635 = Bush investigation/impeachment (9/18/2006 2:29:47 PM)

Did anyone besides me look at its status.  Refered to the Rules Committee 12/18/2005 (exactly 10 months ago).   It hasn't come out since then, or hasn't been heard of since then. 

It stil has several other committees to go through.  If it can't get out of just the first one, which only has to say what the rules will be, then it will never get to the floor.   And even if it got to the floor then there would have to be the investigation.  Anyone have any idea how long that might take?  How long did the 9/11 commission take and that is only one part of the investigation.?    It like so many other bills is dead on arrival regardless of the intentions.




UtopianRanger -> RE: HR635 = Bush investigation/impeachment (9/18/2006 10:46:50 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

I just hope they dont cock it up like they did with our Georgie Galloway. Mind you, our George is a very different guy to Dubya; Galloway could probably defend himself against God if the situation arose, and still win.
E



Heh.... Ole' George is pretty tough....I watched him rip up Norm Coleman on CSPAN - Surprised me actually. [;)]


 - R




Lordandmaster -> RE: HR635 = Bush investigation/impeachment (9/19/2006 7:42:20 AM)

Doesn't seem likely, but who the hell knows.  I wouldn't have guessed that an impeachment over a blowjob in the Oval Office was likely either.




KenDckey -> RE: HR635 = Bush investigation/impeachment (9/19/2006 8:18:39 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

Doesn't seem likely, but who the hell knows.  I wouldn't have guessed that an impeachment over a blowjob in the Oval Office was likely either.


ROFL  I don't think it was so much about the blow job than lieing about it.   That is why he lost his license to practice law.   I believe if he had come out and said yeah I been fucking her and getting blow jobs then most people would have lost interest in a week.   LOL  He should have just defused it.   But by lieing about it caused him to lose his intregrity and the respect of people




philosophy -> RE: HR635 = Bush investigation/impeachment (9/19/2006 9:13:08 AM)

"But by lieing about it caused him to lose his intregrity and the respect of people"

...ok Ken, but sauce for the goose etc..........Clinton lied about a blow job, Bush lied about the reasons for going to war.......one gets impeached, the other, who knows.........so, is lying about sex a worse crime in American eyes than lying about foreign policy?




KenDckey -> RE: HR635 = Bush investigation/impeachment (9/19/2006 10:11:52 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: philosophy

"But by lieing about it caused him to lose his intregrity and the respect of people"

...ok Ken, but sauce for the goose etc..........Clinton lied about a blow job, Bush lied about the reasons for going to war.......one gets impeached, the other, who knows.........so, is lying about sex a worse crime in American eyes than lying about foreign policy?


I think the difference hinges on actual knowledge.   We know that Clinton knew whether or not he got a blow job.   I have never seen actual evidence that Bush had first hand knowledge that he was lying.   I have heard the alligations and the conjecture and appreciate them.  But for actual proof, I haven't seen a thing.   Should he have had actual knowledge?  Hard to say.  probably.  but that too is conjecture regardless of ones position.




bills944 -> RE: HR635 = Bush investigation/impeachment (9/19/2006 10:18:09 AM)

12 warning signs of fascism from the Majority Visibility Project


http://mvp-seattle.com/pages/pageFascism.htm





bills944 -> RE: HR635 = Bush investigation/impeachment (9/19/2006 10:21:07 AM)

crooks and liars


http://movies.crooksandliars.com/MSNBC-Scarbourough-Republican-Spending.wmv




bills944 -> RE: HR635 = Bush investigation/impeachment (9/19/2006 10:22:32 AM)

And we thought Clinton had no self-control - Joe Scarborough


http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2006/0610.scarborough.html




bills944 -> RE: HR635 = Bush investigation/impeachment (9/19/2006 10:26:03 AM)

 The Greatest Story Ever Sold: The Decline and Fall of Truth from 9/11 to Katrina: Books: Frank Rich
From Publishers Weekly
Starred Review. This blistering j'accuse has vitriol to spare for George Bush—calling him a "spoiled brat" and "blowhard"—and his policies, but its main target is the PR machinery that promoted those policies to the American people. New York Times columnist Rich revisits nearly every Bush administration publicity gambit, including Iraqi WMD claims, Bush's "Mission Accomplished" triumph, the Swift-boating of John Kerry and the writing of fake prowar letters-to-the-editor from soldiers. He uncovers nothing new, but his meticulously researched recap-cum-debunking—complete with appended 80-page time line comparing administration spin to actual events—builds a comprehensive picture of a White House propaganda campaign to bamboozle the public, smear critics, camouflage policy disasters and win the 2002 and 2004 elections through trumped-up security anxieties. Along the way, he pillories a sycophantic media (Bob Woodward gets spanked hard), spineless Democrats and an infotainment culture that happily accommodates the Bush administration's erasure of the line between reality and fiction. Sometimes Rich's critique of Republican politics as cynical image-manipulation goes overboard, as in his "wag the dog" theory of the Iraq war as a Karl Rove electoral maneuver; more often, though, it's on target. The result is a caustic, hard-hitting indictment of the Bush administration, timed to make a splash in the upcoming election campaign. (Sept. 19)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

http://www.amazon.com/Greatest-Story-Ever-Sold-Decline/dp/159420098X




philosophy -> RE: HR635 = Bush investigation/impeachment (9/19/2006 10:26:56 AM)

"I think the difference hinges on actual knowledge.   We know that Clinton knew whether or not he got a blow job.   I have never seen actual evidence that Bush had first hand knowledge that he was lying.   I have heard the alligations and the conjecture and appreciate them.  But for actual proof, I haven't seen a thing.   Should he have had actual knowledge?  Hard to say.  probably.  but that too is conjecture regardless of ones position."

....fair point. Although it still strikes me as a skewed set of priorities. A blow job in the Oval Office may be naughty, and lying about it even more so, but surely even the potential that GWB lied about sending an army to war, or the idea that he should have known the facts are far more serious charges. Given the zeal with which Clinton was pursued i find it sad to see that GWB is being given a far easier ride. It certainly puts out an odd picture of American values overseas........the sort of picture that comes back to haunt you whenever an American politician speaks of justice.




bills944 -> RE: HR635 = Bush investigation/impeachment (9/19/2006 10:29:11 AM)

 The Nation -- Keith Olbermann is without a doubt the best news anchor on
television today. Two weeks ago, echoing the spirit of the legendary
Edward R. Murrow, Olbermann took Donald Rumsfeld to task for comparing
critics of the Iraq war to Nazi appeasers. Tonight, broadcasting live
from above a desolate and still demolished Ground Zero, Olbermann
delivered a stirring eight minute commentary indicting the Bush
Administration'
s shameful and tragic response to 9/11. The entire speech
is worth watching. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1OA2wHcBt4




bills944 -> RE: HR635 = Bush investigation/impeachment (9/19/2006 10:32:42 AM)

 

We're toast if Dick doesn't learn quickly
Sep. 15, 2006. 01:00 AM
LINWOOD BARCLAY


"It was the right thing to do, and if we had it to do over again, we'd do exactly the same thing."

U.S. Vice-President Dick Cheney to Meet The Press host Tim Russert, on whether, knowing what he knows now, he'd still have invaded Iraq.

The vice-president was having a difficult time getting his bread out of the toaster. It had been down there a long time, and now there was smoke coming out of the slots, and he was starting to get very angry. He needed to get to work and tell his boss what to do, and he wanted some toast before he left.

He tried jiggling the handle to make the toast pop up but that wouldn't work. He peered down into the slots. One piece of bread had bent over, jamming the apparatus. The vice-president opened the cutlery drawer, grabbed a fork, and stuck it into the toaster to free the bread.

A number of bad things happened then.

There was a huge spark, the lights went out, and the vice-president was tossed across the room. He clutched at his heart to make sure it was still beating.

He decided to grab something to eat on the way to the office, and directed his driver to the drive-through window for an Egg McMuffin. The driver cautioned that the vice-presidential limo was so long, it might not be able to navigate the tight turns, and could take out the huge menu display stand.

The vice-president grumbled and told him to do what he was told, and they were almost to the White House before the menu stand slid off the trunk.

He convened a meeting of his top aides and advisers to discuss the toaster incident.

"What we think happened," said one, "is that you went into the situation without enough information. You could have been, I must admit, better briefed."

"Go on," said the vice-president gruffly.

"First of all, you should have been supplied bread that wouldn't bend over so easily. Grabbing a fork without some sort of plastic insulating handle was a bad call.

"You needed more intel that would have told you that the heating elements inside the toaster conduct electricity. Perhaps, if you had unplugged the toaster first, then stuck the fork inside, that would have been a better call."

Another adviser said, "Uh, I hate to bring this up, but as you may recall, I sent around a memo a few weeks ago advising against sticking a fork into a toaster."

The vice-president pulled out his shotgun, fired once, missed, fired again, got him.

The next morning, the vice-president was getting ready to go to work and put a couple of slices of bread into the toaster. One slice got jammed and before long the bread was catching on fire and smoke was billowing out of the toaster slots.

"For the love of Pete," the vice-president said, and went to the cutlery drawer and grabbed a fork and stuck it into the toaster and then there was a huge spark and the lights went out and the vice-president got thrown clear across the kitchen.

He clutched at his heart to see that he was still alive.

There wasn't time to start over so he instructed his driver to hit the drive-through for an Egg McMuffin, and the driver tactfully tried to remind the vice-president about what had the day before with the menu stand.

The driver heard the vice-president in the backseat pump his shotgun and decided, what the hell, it's not my car.

At the office, the vice-president asked where he could find the president, and was told he was in the residence, making some breakfast.

"I better get there quick," the vice-president said, "before he does something stupid."

http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1158228016975&call_page=TS_Life&call_pageid=991479973472&call_pagepath=Life/News&pubid=968163964505
__._,_.___




bills944 -> RE: HR635 = Bush investigation/impeachment (9/19/2006 10:37:28 AM)

"There's a lot more to being president than keeping your schlong in your pants."
Bill Maher




bills944 -> RE: HR635 = Bush investigation/impeachment (9/19/2006 10:48:13 AM)

 
[size=6 bgcolor="#ffffff"]Olbermann: Bush's 'rush' to redefine Geneva Conventions may be mostly about 'covering his own backside'
David Edwards
Published: Saturday September 16, 2006
   Keith Olbermann's Friday broadcast on MSNBC featured a long look at the President's contentious Rose Garden press conference on Friday, dubbing it the "Roast Garden," and then pondered whether Bush's urgency to redefine the Geneva Convention had more to do with "covering his own backside" than anything else.At a Friday press conference, an animated President Bush tells reporters that the U.S. program to interrogate terrorist suspects will not continue unless Congress creates new legal definitions for Common Article 3 or the Geneva Conventions -- a move that has alarmed some GOP senators and former Secretary of State Colin Powell.   Bush also devoted his Saturday radio address to the issue.In video of the Friday presser, a visibly angry President raises his voice as responds to reporters' questions.    NBC White House Correspondent David Gregory asks the President how he would react if American officers were interrogated based on another country's own re-interpreted version of the Geneva Conventions. Without answering the question, Bush says, "We can debate this issue all we want but the practical matter is if our professionals do not have clear standards in the law, the program will not go forward."   Further pressed by Gregory for an answer, Bush raises his voice and says, "You can ask this question all you want but the bottom line is -- and the American people have got to understand this -- that this program won't go forward... if there are vague standards applied like those in Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions. It's just not going to go forward. Now, perhaps some in Congress don't think the program is important. That's fine."   Afterward, Georgetown University Constitutional Law Professor Jonathan Turley joined Keith Olbermann for a discussion on why the president was in such a hurry to get the legislation passed "his way."Turley agreed with Olbermann that Bush's primary motive might be in "covering his own backside."   Turley noted that the 14 high level detainees recently transferred to Guantanamo Bay are due to be interviewed by the Red Cross, and that "most people believe that they will reveal that they were subject to water boarding - held under water until you think that you are going to drown - that is undeniably torture under the international standard."   "I think that the Administration senses that there is a lot of trouble coming down the mountain," said Turley.See the video from Keith Olbermann's "Countdown" show on MSNBC: Watch Videos:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ag3QsL2hbXI  and    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_FPZNue2bYg    http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Video_Bush_rants_at_reporters_in_0916.html




Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875