OhReallyNow -> RE: M/s vs. D/s (9/27/2006 6:31:25 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: zumala OhReallyNow's definition disturbs me a little bit. Probably because I just heard from a slave on the other side who decided to tell me out of the blue that her Master sold her to her current Mistress as a sex slave and that her Mistress demands sex constantly. She said it was hard but she /had/ to serve. I pointed out that actual slavery is illegal in the States and that my understanding of the difference between slavery and BDSM was consent. I told her she actually had a choice. She can stay and serve, or she can leave. It's up to her to decide what is in her best interest. If you have the CHOICE to leave, you cannot truly be owned property. Or can you? I guess you own your dog and it can run away. Bah, don't mind me. Not enough coffee yet, obviously. zuma yes, if you have the choice to leave, one can just leave. however, when this slave offered herself to Master, she did so knowing ( in her mind and in her heart ) that there would be no release unless Master decided to end the relationship. She also knows that although she is just property, Master would never do anything to harm his property intentionally. Now, one thing that was discussed between this slave and her owner, prior to her offering herself, was something along these lines. It was accepted by Master that this slave would not be 'sold'. Master has the right to loan out his property at his whim and will and this slave accepts that, but, with our agreement in place, Master can not 'sell' his property to another.
|
|
|
|