Pussy pictures on Wikipedia!

Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity

Message

Lordandmaster -> Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! (10/5/2006 9:58:57 PM)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vulva Whoda thunk it? Are they going to get shut down for posting pornography without a proper license?

Marc2b -> RE: Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! (10/5/2006 10:07:27 PM)
Nice to know that Wikipedia is good for something.[:D] Edited because I cliked the wrong stupid smiley.

juliaoceania -> RE: Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! (10/5/2006 10:31:20 PM)
Wikipedia is good for many things BTW I do not see a labeled photo of the female anatomy as being pornographic.. but that is just my opinion

Bluebird -> RE: Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! (10/5/2006 10:33:47 PM)
You don't need a "license" to show anything, but if you show "graphic or simulated lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area" or sex (of any variety including masturbation) or "sadistic or masochistic abuse", you do need a 2257 statement certifying the location of the records proving the model(s) were of age when footage was shot. This of course, assumes said material is located/produced/hosted within the USA. http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00002257----000-.html However, you could argue that that Wikipedia entry is purely educational (and heaven knows, a lot of men could do with some education about where the appropriate parts are located!), and therefore is not subject to said asinine law which does nothing to protect children or prevent kiddie porn and everything to harass adult producers and performers.

CrappyDom -> RE: Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! (10/5/2006 11:04:27 PM)
You would think they wouldn't use the vagina of a girl who wasn't the least turned on, I would have chosen the vagina of a woman who had been through childbirth.

Lordandmaster -> RE: Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! (10/5/2006 11:45:06 PM)
You people do realize that I was being sarcastic, right?

Bluebird -> RE: Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! (10/5/2006 11:48:25 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster You people do realize that I was being sarcastic, right? Well, I DID assume that you had probably seen a sample of sacred womanliness at some point and therefore you were simply amused and not WOWed. [:D]

cuddleheart50 -> RE: Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! (10/6/2006 3:34:01 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vulva Whoda thunk it? Are they going to get shut down for posting pornography without a proper license? Now we know what you do in your spare time....[:D]

Aileen68 -> RE: Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! (10/6/2006 4:07:33 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: cuddleheart50 quote: ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vulva Whoda thunk it? Are they going to get shut down for posting pornography without a proper license? Now we know what you do in your spare time....[:D] I hope that's not all he does. I bet LaM used to sneak and look at the National Geographics when he was a little boy.

Lordandmaster -> RE: Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! (10/6/2006 7:13:22 AM)
Laughing. Guilty as charged. quote: ORIGINAL: Aileen68 I bet LaM used to sneak and look at the National Geographics when he was a little boy.

Aeon -> RE: Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! (10/9/2006 9:10:53 AM)
At the very least they could have found a nice looking one to use rather than one as Crappy Dom said looked "unaroused" or otherwise unattractive. Seriously, imagine the people who are actually looking this up. What would you think if that was the first pussy you ever saw? eek lol

LaTigresse -> RE: Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! (10/9/2006 9:15:30 AM)
I just got kinda grossed out at photo #2, with dirty fingernails......call me weird.

windchymes -> RE: Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! (10/9/2006 12:53:44 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Aeon At the very least they could have found a nice looking one to use rather than one as Crappy Dom said looked "unaroused" or otherwise unattractive. Seriously, imagine the people who are actually looking this up. What would you think if that was the first pussy you ever saw? eek lol Yeah, but if they showed one all shaved and glistening with a clit ring, and the nails were painted FuckMe Red, you know someone out there would scream, "Pornography!!!" They have to show a "real" one for clinical and educational purposes.[;)] They have a nice link to "Cameltoe", with a photo, too! I never knew "Mooseknuckle" was another term for it, lmao! God, ya gotta love Wikipedia.

Lordandmaster -> RE: Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! (10/9/2006 2:29:54 PM)
You can find a picture of a clit piercing on Wikipedia here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clitoral_hood_piercing More pussy pics here, for those who just can't get enough: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mons_veneris http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pubic_hair Alas, no doggie-style pics. I checked. quote: ORIGINAL: windchymes Yeah, but if they showed one all shaved and glistening with a clit ring, and the nails were painted FuckMe Red, you know someone out there would scream, "Pornography!!!" They have to show a "real" one for clinical and educational purposes.[;)]

Yang4yin -> RE: Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! (10/11/2006 7:59:03 AM)
Don't forget to check out the external links, like this one: http://www.the-clitoris.com/n_html/n_v_image1.htm

mnottertail -> RE: Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! (10/11/2006 8:03:20 AM)
Well it's a good thing they got 'snap' shots on Wiki, how else is a guy gonna know what the chasm of extasy looks like with all the fakes here? LOLOLOLOL, Ron

KinkDomCum -> RE: Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! (10/11/2006 10:09:22 PM)
Lets not forget: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hymen

KinkDomCum -> RE: Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! (10/11/2006 10:26:39 PM)
Not a pussy pic per se, but definite wikiporn: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felatio

Lordandmaster -> RE: Pussy pictures on Wikipedia! (10/11/2006 11:39:47 PM)
Well, but that's just a drawing. They have all kinds of drawings of stuff. I think we need to set the bar at color photos only.

Page: [1]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125