RE: The Capitalization Conundrum (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


liljoy -> RE: The Capitalization Conundrum (1/25/2005 2:45:27 AM)

Being a typo queen i usually read it pretty well.

"ar ur kan recogniz me now? YES?A? Why u do n't anrepl?"

This however has me totally stumped.

MadameDahlia, did You by any chance get a translation?

lil_joy




MadameDahlia -> RE: The Capitalization Conundrum (1/25/2005 3:19:18 AM)

Yes. It eventually boiled down to him trying to get me to turn on a webcam. When that didn't work he informed me that I was both a horse and a donkey.

I've never considered myself livestock so I asked whether or not he referred to a horse's er... arse. He took offense and quite cheerfully threatened to track me down and kill me.

I'd slowly been gathering that he wasn't in full control of his wits and probably didn't have a friggin' grasp on reality. I figured if he could make idle threats I ought to give as good as I got.

I informed him that threatening people in such a way was bound to get him into trouble. I told him I'd track him down and alert his local police. I asked whether or not he'd ever been to jail and said I'd love to hear from him once he'd settled into his new home. Of course at that point I was spouting off just as much silliness as he. I don't know how to track anyone down using their computer. A friend of mine does but that's an entirely different story.

At the mention of jail time and involving the police he began to flood my screen with "no" "plz" "sorry" "sorry" "sorry" "no" "sorry" until I told him I'd discarded the idea. He then asked "how ur? and wher?"

No longer amused with his antics and no longer willing to put up with his delightful chatter I informed him that personal information was personal for a reason prior to blocking his name.




MistressDREAD -> RE: The Capitalization Conundrum (1/25/2005 4:18:31 AM)


your right songbird26
your words do show
your self being a newbie.
quote:

The whole cap/third person thing is an online invention, and, like the hanky code, it serves a purpose. It quickly identifies the style of slave/sub you are without a lengthy conversation. Truth is, it works quite well, a lot better than the hanky code ever did.

YEP YEP AND YEP, I CONCUR WITH THE TALL DARK AND WITTY TO THE LEFT.

The value of words,
The value of how they are written
The value of how they are read
The value of how they are expressed
The value of how they are enjoyed
The value of how they are percieved
are totally gained from the reader
and the writer when they are used.
What end result gained by either is
of the choice of mind.
Conundrums are good for the soul..[;)]..JMO




MizSuz -> RE: The Capitalization Conundrum (1/25/2005 4:29:02 AM)

Welcome back Taggard!

Wow, it's good to see you here. [:)]






sweetpleaser -> RE: The Capitalization Conundrum (1/25/2005 7:23:03 AM)

Taggard: it is so nice to see you posting again, we truly missed you!! Stay awhile, there's a whole new bunch to get to know.[:)]




ShadeDiva -> RE: The Capitalization Conundrum (1/26/2005 11:50:58 PM)

My all time favorite smartassed reply to dominants whenI was more in my submissive skin and they were *demanding* that I use capitials for their names to denote respect was to ask them a very simple series of questions:

Your orientated on my lack of capping you and your and domme/dom/dominant when referring to you because you feel that unless I am doing so, I am choosing to deliberately show you disrespect, correct?

Ah okay, I see. Would you please answer my next question then - in real life should we meet and interact, could you please inform me on how to speak the capitial letter so that you know I am shwoing respect when I speak or refer to you in real life?

Oh, there isn't a way for me to pronounce a capitial letter as opposed to a lowercase letter with speech? What a pain. Well how will you know when I am showing you the respect you feel I should be showing you in real life when we meet if I' can't clearly show you I am capping your name and your title/power identification?

Oh, you would know by my conduct?

So if I am not capping your name in speech and that has no bearing on how to tell if I am offering you respect or not - then why in the world do tyou feel the only way I can show respect online is with a capped letter? If you would know through time and my conduct in the real world so too shall you know it in the cyber world.

And yes, that means I *won't* be capping your name - my respect pught to show in other ways as it does in real life.

That is unless of course you have some manner of telling when I'm not capping your name while speaking.

Sheesh.

If the ONLY way a dominant can tell if they have someone's respect is by a freaking dumb letter in text - they have far worse problems than not getting the respect they feel they are for whatever reaon, due.

Get real.

People lose respect from me the second they demand something as silly and insignificant as that and actually place VALUE to such a ridiculous thing.

JMO, FWIIW

~ShadeDiva




VyperX -> RE: The Capitalization Conundrum (1/27/2005 5:53:25 AM)

My perspective here: The caps game can be charming. Text removes quite a bit of both humanity and contact from human contact, so perhaps it's an adaptation within the medium.

That said, again, I think I'm going to find myself siding with Topcat regularly. Language is daily and increasingly butchered as it is. Among the worst is "s/he," which is just grammatically unnecessary and made to emphasize that the indefinite reference of he, while already implicit in English usage, could be a she.

But .... I may not always be good at it, but on rare occasion I manage to "choose my battles" prudently. This makes some folks happy. The writing of, say, 95% of adults is, well, not great from the start. This practice may be grammatically incorrect, but at least it's not born of ignorance. And when I'm kind of bored, like I say, it can be charming.

If you don't want to do it, don't. Thinking people won't think less of you if you don't adhere to it. I know I wouldn't.





DreamWeaverAz -> RE: The Capitalization Conundrum (1/27/2005 8:11:25 PM)

now how did I know I would find the angelic ones words here on this topic? lol

I would agree with much of what has been said. it is not so much the Capping or Third person that is important as the tone and meaning behind what is said. now personally I do the Capping, perhaps its because its what I know best, its a way in this online world where My physical expressions are not viewable and at least in the manner of Capping or not I can show respect and O/others grasp the intent and tonality that go with it. thats My personal view on it.

As for the third person, everything has a time and a place, it may be right for O/one and never used by another. If you dont like it, dont use it, I have had the tendancy to use it and see nothing wrong with it, it comes easily to My mind.

as long as I have known dark~angel (and thats some time..lol) her words have always been filled with the truth of her experiences and she speaks her mind beautifully and I will most definatly agree that W/we should all endevor to be UNIQUE because the L/s is not what makes U/us...W/we in all O/our uniqueness of need and desire make it.

DW




ShadeDiva -> RE: The Capitalization Conundrum (1/28/2005 7:52:07 PM)

I never got the D/double L/letter T/thingie myself.

I mean if you are in that much need to have yourself addressed with a cap - I dunno. I just don't grok that one.

I don't need ego-strokes. I don't need to be recognized as a dominant by every single word that refers to a person.

If others do, cool, I guess, but I'd rather read someone without having to fight juist to comprehend their message.

Communication is a two way street - and it's hard enough in text as it is - so I just don't get why folks go out of their way to make it harder for themselves to be understood.

Just my POV.

~ShadeDiva




ShadowKnight -> RE: The Capitalization Conundrum (1/28/2005 9:00:19 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: sfgrrl

quote:

ORIGINAL: ShadowKnight

The capitalizations I don't care about one way or the other.

Then why do you always capitalize the personal pronouns like 'Me' and 'My' in all your posts?

~stef


Because that is how I feel like doing it. Apparently it causes you some type of problem...oh well you'll live I am sure. Can't see Myself getting worked up about what a sub or slave wants or prefers.

ShadowKnight




stef -> RE: The Capitalization Conundrum (1/28/2005 9:27:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ShadowKnight

quote:

ORIGINAL: sfgrrl

quote:

ORIGINAL: ShadowKnight

The capitalizations I don't care about one way or the other.

Then why do you always capitalize the personal pronouns like 'Me' and 'My' in all your posts?


Because that is how I feel like doing it. Apparently it causes you some type of problem.

It does? That's news to me.

~stef




darkinshadows -> RE: The Capitalization Conundrum (1/29/2005 4:33:32 AM)

quote:

Communication is a two way street - and it's hard enough in text as it is - so I just don't get why folks go out of their way to make it harder for themselves to be understood.


Maybe the people who are making it harder for themselves to be understood, are simply just, being themselves, and not thinking about what others may think or perceive?

I have been pulled up on my style of writing before. Some say it is too long. Some say too complex. Even hard to read because of the font. But then, I write the way I do because it is me. I dont think about it. The font is what fits Angel best and I am comfortable with.
Does writing in this way, make my words easier to read? Possibly, but then they are just drab and lifeless in my opinion and is not conveying the true part of me.

I do not purposefully 'cap' or make sure I am in either 'first' or 'third' person... I speak what is in me at that moment in time. If I have to be careful about what I am writing, or thinking or speaking... then surely that makes my words of no use, false, because I am merely saying the exact things the other person wishes to listen to, not what is from my heart?

If I believe I have something of any use for anyone, or I am asked, I speak it. Its complicated enough getting to that level of communication with a person. And if a person is interested enough in my opinions and wishes to know more about me, or are having difficulty understanding, then surely that just opens up the conversation more... allowing the communication to increase and for the personalities to come through?

I will Cap if thats a Dominants Choice when we have established respect. I will read and study in depth, words that I have problems understanding.
In the same way, I will read just as deeply a person who writes D/double L/letters or a person who writes in one solid sentance without stopping with no puncuation or paragraphs and is one complete sentance that doesnt stop and said in one huge long breath... they still may still have something good to say that I may learn from, even if it takes an impossible time to try to understand. But I will not change what I am comfortable with and betray who I am. If a person wishes to listen, then fine... if not, Its not up to me to force them.

A person has to study words carefully before they can hear. And surely those that would hear (or at least try to)are much more interesting than those who just merely, listen.




songbird26 -> RE: The Capitalization Conundrum (1/29/2005 6:34:49 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MistressDREAD


your right songbird26
your words do show
your self being a newbie.



Ow, my eyes. Ow ow ow.

I guess I just use it as a form of triage for my inbox now. Anyone who goes nuts with the 'Me's' and 'My's' and 'This One's Powerful Hand Of Sensual Torture' and so on is kind of an automatic delete (though I still try to respond politely to everyone who writes more than one line or sentence). It's a useful sorting method. So, I guess I'll have to take back my original statement, and encourage those dominants who use that convention to the extreme to just keep on truckin,' and thank them politely for their time. *grin* I figure if I can find someone who cherishes the English language as I do, it's just one more point of commonality for us to work from. I am loving reading this thread; thank you to everyone who took the time to reply.

Edit to clarify: What works for one might not work for another, and for those who are happy and content with the convention, I am not in any way denigrating your choice. And the posters above are right: WHAT is said is fundamentally more important than HOW it is said. However, this particular convention keeps me from getting to the 'what', since I'm sidelined by my objection to the 'how', and therefore it simply cannot work for me as an individual!




ShadeDiva -> RE: The Capitalization Conundrum (1/29/2005 3:59:17 PM)

Hmm let me see if I can clarify myself a tad.

Angel - I'd agree - it *is* up to the person indeed how they type. No one is telling *anyone* to change - especially me.

I find italics in the font CM uses here when it's not bold hard to read - probably due to my eyesight than anything else.

It *is* your choice, and I'm not asking you or anyone else to change - what I am saying is only this:

(note the you here is a general you - not directed at any specific person here on these boards or otherwise)

Communication is a two way street - part of the responsibility on EACH person is to try to make an effort that what they say is clearly understood to those they are saying it to. The other part of the responsibility is for each person to make an effort to understand what the other is saying - and working around the other person's style, limitations, comprehension, and whatever else might be present for both the delivery end and the receiving end.

You make a choice when you communicate or receive what you will do for the other person or people you are communicating with, on how far you will go to see that you are reaching them, and if it compromises you. Whether that compromise is reality or in your mind doesn't really matter I'd imagine. (Not saying it is that way for anyone specific, this is a generalize statement)

If you decide you will only go so far - that's cool. It's the person's choice to make. In text odd things come into play - because eyes vary and sometimes things are visually difficult to process for a thousand different reasons. Verbally the same applies to hearing - a thousand reasons might prevent someone to hear the words you speak. Those with the limitations can either try to find a workaround - or they hope the speaker will make it easier for them - or they simply just are cut out by those circumstances to not be privy to what the other is saying, and then miss out on whatever value the speaker might bring into their life or manner of thinking.

Sometimes shit just works that way. lol.

(end of the general you hehe)

I actually have to use a magnifying glass for your font angel, which I suppose I ought to have said before when I mentioned it - just no one asked, and I don't know why I didn't say it. It's *my* problem, *my* limitation. It's only *your* problem if you'd like me *specifically* to see what you are saying - if not, then my limitations aren't your concern and there would be no valid reason for you to make any sort of effort to work around my (just one single person in allllllll the members of CM that don't have the same limitations) little visual crutch. To be honest the only reason I got my glass out to read the rest of your post was that the un-italized portion combined with the snippage of my post made me realize you were addressing me, and I ought to make that effort to see.

Now if I got off my lazy butt and got a new keyboard where the Ctrl button was working - this wouldn't be an issue for me, but I simply haven't been able too yet. Otherwise all I have to do is hold down the Ctrl key and use the scroll button to make the text enlarge. So this would be where *I* failed in MY part (for whatever reasons - doesn't matter if they are good ones or not, it's still my failing, lol) to correct a communication obstacle.

(back to the general you)

But really I see this a lot online, and always have, and I don't expect it to ever change. People throw their stuff out and say fuck it if you don't get it, it's like their concept of communication is I put it out and it's up to you to get it, don't expect me to make it easier for you to grok me. I've never understood that - no judgment there, just I have never understood why people feel communication shouldn't require effort on BOTH parts. I have no issue myself with modulating myself visually for those that have issues - hell I've have made my sites fonts bigger for a single person that reported to me that they liked a certain site but simply were unable to read it - one person out of thousands. Some would have told her tough luck, or to use the Ctrl key, hell it's just ONE person, no one else cares why the fuck should *I* change ... but it was such a *small* thing for me to do for her sake, and it made her feel good, and it helped her. It was my choice to make that decision, and I understand when others might not do the same thing for a single person out of a million or whatever - but after seeing her reaction, I think if it doesn't negatively affect the masses, why the hell not - I'll do it again lol.

I don't expect the masses to agree with me, I am *always* the odd duck it seems in most shit. I don't expect people to choose to make things easier, because in all reality humans don't like to do that unless their is something in it for them that they can see. Some folks get off on being cryptic or making it purposefully difficult to understand them (not you angel) - they do it on purpose with the intent on getting a negative reaction and enjoy people struggling trying to understand what it is they are saying, they are looking for this odd sort of shock effect which they usually giggle about and it somehow feeds something in their psyche. THAT I really don't understand. Why deliberately make it harder? They enjoy it, so that is why, but it escapes me why they do.

But in regard to words being flat - I dunno I have SUCH a love affair with the written word, that it isn't the visual *style* of the words that breath life and soul into the text (and I'm a freaking artist - you'd imagine that the visual style would have a LOT more importance to me in writing, it's kinda weird that it doesn't, I think LOL), but the words and the way they are arranged (not visually but structurally. I realize that others aren't geared the same way - I *am* a weirdo after all LOL. But for me, it's what you say and how you say it that holds the soul, the aliveness, the character of the person, not how you dress it up. But then I am forever one to hate the masks we use to present ourselves anyway, I guess in some fashion, maybe I see the visual style as a type of mask.

Hmm. I'll need to think about that - never thought of that before. Cool! I think I just saw a piece of my mindset I'd never noticed before thanks!

I dunno. I *do* really love what you say angel, and my comment on it being hard for me to read wasn't a criticism, or wasn't *meant* to be - it simply is a fact for me at this time and has been since you have been posting. And it is MY limitation as a human to for some reason, when I see a single block of text, without punctuation, or weirdly capped words and lower case words, or odd fonts, or incomplete words, it is MY limitation when my brain wants to immediately dismiss it and my eyes run over it without actually reading the words in there. It is also *my* choice - bad or good - to not take the time to sit down, and force myself to read it just in case there is something in all of it that might be something I will take away from their communication and be glad I did.

Just as it is their choice to present their thoughts in that manner that will limit the amount of folks (either in the masses or singularly) that will sit down and not skin over it and take the time and effort to pick at it until they comprehend what the other is saying. And I am SURE that some folks find reading ME particularly difficult for a variety of reasons as well - gods know I am not perfect in how I communicate! (though I'd sure love to hear what it is that folks find hard in my writing style as then I could see if it is something I could or would address)

When I say it is a two way street - I mean it, cuz it *is*. I hold as much fault as the writer on those things. *I* don't shy away from that fault - but I see a lot of writers and readers that seem to. <shrug> It's not going to change, nor do I expect it to.

It simply is.

Gee I wonder if any of that makes ANY sense to someone else? LOL.

~ShadeDiva




darkinshadows -> RE: The Capitalization Conundrum (1/29/2005 4:26:56 PM)

Yes... It makes perfect sense, truely.

And I do know that you did not single my font out. A few have said it takes time to read what I say. Maybe thats part of why I do it... because I know people study the words harder... lol @me [:D]...But joking apart, I also know that many like the font and that, for the moment outweighs the negative. If I do have something specific to say to You, Shade(if I was responding to a post of yours etc) - I will endeavour to make sure that I do so in a font that You can read, now that I know and understand your desire.

The words can be 'flat'... lol, probably the wrong way to describe words coming from a synaesthesic... After reading what You wrote, You made me think about why I do it. There is a possiblity I am gaining more than I realise from reading words in different fonts and sizes, etc... because I 'see' them differently... the larger the font, the more exciting they become... but thats just what I see(colours/taste/sounds) and I shouldnt expect others to see the same. I am so used to my synaesthesia, I tend to forget others don't have the same experience... I take it for granted, just like my other senses. Thats something You've opened my eyes to! Thank You!

Love and Peace




DarkPaladin -> RE: The Capitalization Conundrum (1/29/2005 6:52:33 PM)

Dear songbird:

The capitalization craze started in the mid to late 90's with the advent of BDSM oriented chat rooms. Early on it seemed like a convient way of showing who was dominant and who was submissive. The capital letter only applied to the person screen name, not to all the personal pronouns (I vs i, Me vs me; or the really weird W/we).

I suppose it was an attempt to imitate the practice of "flagging" in the Gay Leather clubs that were the inspiration for much of the upsurge in popularity of BDSM in the 90's. In the Leather Clubs the famous "hanky code" prevailed (this was and still is actually called flagging). A handkerchief in the left hand pocket of your jeans indicated a top or dominant, on the right it indicated a bottom or submissive. Later the color of the hanky came to indicate the preferred practice; black for heavy SM, red for anal fisting, yellow for golden showers and so on. In the hetero/pan sexual clubs that emerged at about the same time as the internet chat rooms - style of dress was what flagged the tops and bottoms (dominants and submissives.)

Flagging was not really that necessary at the het clubs though because most folks came in couples (or polyamorous groups.) Unlike the Gay Leather scene, showing up solo and cruising was not all that common and in many clubs was actively discouraged.

Unfortunately that early chatroom practice has now infected every BDSM related site on the internet. Most real time lifestyle folks have dropped using it because it is cumbersome to type, hard to read ...and let's face just bad grammer. It is fading but it is fading slowly.

Regards,
DP




Mercnbeth -> RE: The Capitalization Conundrum/history (2/13/2005 9:43:06 AM)

there is a very interesting article about the history of capitalization at the following:

http://www.domsubinfo/historical/html

as posting the entire article would be a violation of the TOS, here is an excerpt:

quote:

Many people are introduced to the Lifestyle via electronic media such as chat rooms, message boards, mailing lists and so on. Because these venues are based on written communication it is common for people who are new to the lifestyle to come across writing customs they are unfamiliar with...
Newcomers may be told a variety of reasons for this behavior: distinguishing a Dominant from a submissive online, formal displays of humility and respect, emphasis on status, etc. i, like many of these people, took this practice to heart as an outward display of D/s protocols. It was only when i began to encounter some opposition to these practices that I became curious about their origins.
After research, i discovered interesting historical aspects on this subject. i offer my findings here, not as to state "what you should do" but rather as a polite rebuttal to the perception that the use of lowercase names started as part of online roleplay. It is also intended as a rebuttal to those who veil pride behind the claim that forgoing modern capitalization is somehow less educated, and criticize the use of improper English...The dialect we speak(mainly American English in the US) is actually very young, less than 200 years old. What some term proper English is not truly traditional in a historical sense...


from this slave's perspective, dark~angel summed it up well with this statement
quote:

If I speak in third, its not so much 'my' wish... but more of a reaction to the Dominants will I am serving at the time.


the same could be said for however He wishes to be referred to---if He requested to be addressed as Merc the Just, then it would be this slave's responsibility to refer to Him as EXACTLY that. if this slave had no Master, it would be up to her as to how she communicated, online or r/l.




Darthbetta -> RE: The Capitalization Conundrum (2/13/2005 10:00:33 AM)

I TYPE ALL MY WORDS IN CAPITALS BECAUSE THEY ARE JUST THAT IMPORTANT AND EVERY ONE SHOULD SUBMIT TO MY AUTHORITY ON ANY SUBJECT. I ALSO TYPE IN LOUD BOLD TEXT TO EMPHASIZE MY UBAR-STATUS !

BOW NOW BEFORE MY .50 SIZE TEXT !




Bwana55419 -> RE: The Capitalization Conundrum (2/13/2005 10:15:40 AM)

I get terribly uncomfortable when I get an email dripping the “protocol” or any of what I perceive to be submissive construct. I just want to have reasonable exchanges without all the trappings.

As it is the clarity of my writing is highly suspect, adding a contrived protocol into the mix would just confuse me more.




proudsub -> RE: The Capitalization Conundrum (2/13/2005 11:14:12 AM)

quote:

BOW NOW BEFORE MY .50 SIZE TEXT !


LMAO as i bow to the text but not to the bucket.[:D]




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875