cloudboy
Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005 Status: offline
|
I have a Love - Hate relationship with the show LOST. LOVE: I like the setting, the characters, the dialogue, imagination, and escapism of the show. HATE: I dislike the faux suspense, filler flashbacks, and Gilligan's Island / hide-the-ball predictability of the show. I think the potential excellence of the show is undermined by the Network's need to pump ratings and churn out episodes. Unlike a novel or HBO series, the story cannot be told to any satifying conclusion because it would end the show and kill the cash cow. In the end, the audience is really just being toyed with. ------ This SEASON What intrigues me about this season is the set up of the clash between "the others" and the Islanders. For all-intents-and-purposes, the Islanders are THE AMERICANS: individualistic, anti-authoritarian, competitive, decentralized, multi-ethnic, and multi talented. The others are communal, authoritarian, centralized, and anti-individual. Basically, the others are the USSR (torture, guns, foul play, espionage, self serving, and enslaving) while the Islanders are the USA (colonists seeking to balance and harmonize strong individuals with the need for group cooperation and self defense.) In the end, the Islanders victory and revenge over the others (the probable outcome) will be a victory replayed of the USA over the USSR, of liberty over tyranny, of individual rights over communal ones. Locke is set up to be the Roosevelt figure (farmer / New Deal) who turns warrior leader (WWII / Fight with the Others.) The question is, how will the inevitiable fight between these two groups change them?
|