Moleculor -> RE: calling a girl out ... your opinions? (1/29/2005 7:30:15 AM)
|
If she stated that your master was not sadistic enough for her, why did he continue to write? Honestly, you don't have to answer that one. I could understand a second email if the entire rest of the email was promising. However, I have to agree with her response about the "girl" names and such. To some, being called "girl" by someone who is contacting her from a position of being a "dominant" on a kink-personals site is tantamount to calling her "my slave". It would be like me walking into some BDSM chat room, and some girl calling me 'Sir' just because I use proper punctuation. By calling someone something other than their name, you either assume far too much about them, or give the impression of assuming far too much about them. Without the benefit of voice/tone to add meaning to your words, refrain from "pet" names, ESPECIALLY when initially contacting someone. Also, who the in the bleedin' nine hells of Baalor are you to suggest that just because she isn't kowtowing to your dominant, she isn't submissive? He is not her dominant, she has not been collared by him and she has not, insofar as I can see, been in any submissive position, such as being tied to the bed, with your dominant. Until she agrees to be submissive to your dominant, your dominant is not her dominant, so she can be as respectful or disrespectful as she feels like, and still call herself whatever the hell she feels like. She is, in all probability, most likely a submissive to people she submits to and nothing more. Much like every other sane person who's into BDSM. Only stupid people submit to anyone.
|
|
|
|