HollyS
Posts: 230
Joined: 1/5/2006 Status: offline
|
Thanks so much for answering me on this. I'm going to address both Celeste and Kyra together, since your points are so similar. quote:
ORIGINAL: BitaTruble Sometimes it's hard to embrace the notion that service is best performed as your dominant directs and not as you believe it should be and that includes those times when it's 'his' desire that you should be pleased and/or have pleasure yourself. I've so been there! When he used to get up to get himself a cup of coffee or a soda I felt as if that was "MY" job and he was preventing me from doing it! How dare he!! ::laughs:: Well, doh on me.. 'my' job is to serve as he wants me to serve, period so that's how he 'dared'. I got it.. took a while, but I got it. If you want, you'll get it too.. eventually. quote:
ORIGINAL: kyraofMists I see this often, that submissives get themselves into what I consider to be traps by defining submission in certain ways. I see so many define submission by their feelings or certain sets of behaviors. Then they start to question their submissiveness when they don't feel that way or do not get to perform those behaviors. Your thread is a perfect example of that. I hear you say that submission is about self-denial or not enjoying what is happening and that a submissive does all the work. Yesterday, you didn't do all the work and you enjoyed it and now you wonder am I less of a submissive. I did this for a time with other things and then I realised that submission is about obedience, obedience to his will. My feelings about it and the actual tasks that I do are irrelevant. As long as I am being obedient to his will then I am submitting to him. Getting down to the basics of submission stopped me from questioning my identity. I obey him so I am submissive to him. I hear what you're both saying, truly I do. I even understand and totally agree, intellectually, that there things he does purely because he wants to and there's nothing required from me except to just "be there." The issue isn't one of obedience -- I'm happy to do whatever it is that he asks whenever he asks. This is purely about me feeling like something is "off" or wrong for enjoying what's happening, even though I know in my head that such thoughts are silly. It doesn't stop me from obeying... I don't think he had any idea I thought this way until I said something several hours later. Like many people here I'm a product of the way I was trained. Celeste, you've been gracious enough to post about how what's gone before affects where you are now and kyra, you've mentioned your struggles in learning new ways to serve while with KoM. In my case, the people who trained me were pretty insistent that pleasure is the province of one's Owner; allowing oneself as an s-type to indulge in enjoying service is a distraction. I believe that all of the ways people express their submission can be valid and actively resist any sort of "one-size" or "twue way" definitions. I'd never hold anyone else to such an obviously flawed idea. Still, the voices are there -- F. and K. and L. all whispering in my ear -- that I'm doing something terribly wrong and will never understand service because I'm really just in this for myself. All their lessons on "being in the present" and attentiveness and duty were colored with the dictum that gratification is the realm of "do me bottoms." Flawed, I know, but there it is. I appreciate the advice and I'll try harder to focus on my purpose, less on being directly active. It's probably just a matter of rewiring this stubborn old brain of mine... Thanks much, ~Holly
_____________________________
I wish my lawn were emo, so it would cut itself.
|