Wolfspet
Posts: 143
Joined: 1/11/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth quote:
I hate that the "One" affectation. It somehow implies that A) they are omnipotent B) they are soemhow superior Dominants, male or female are people just like the rest of us. Wolfspet, This isn't a topic I would normally comment. It's like complaining about what's on TV or the radio. Most TV's and radios come with buttons or knobs that enable most to change the channel or even turn if off if the subject matter isn't to your liking. Don't like the manner which someone posts - Don't read it. the topic was about not liking the term, I believe my reply was appropriate. quote:
Maybe this perspective will help you understand or at least appreciate something about the dynamic of using this style of writing. Recently there was a thread posted about how to maintain submissive head space in a 24/7 relationship. A real time 24/7 relationship. The third person writing style, speaking style, and the capitalization of any reference to the slave's owner is a tool to accomplish this goal. Umm, I have been in the scene for 23 years, and married to my Master for the past 16 years. I was trained in a "Old Guard" tradition in Richmond, Virgina. I have never done anything but what you describe as "real time 24/7" quote:
Training involves visual, tactile, auditory, and mental reinforcement. A "collar" can be represented by a real collar, maybe in disguise as a necklace. The lack of panties/bra and a shaved pubic region give tactile reminder. Third person speech is the auditory training tool. Writing and communicating requires mental commitment. If you doubt it's effectiveness - try it. It takes an effort to speak in third person. It is work to write, especially when the computer tries to correct you all the time and capitalizes 'i'. For the Master, hearing and seeing the slave communicate in this manner is empowering, also reminding him of his position in the relationship. Please do not condensend to me. As I said I am quite aware of training. quote:
I'm not trying to change anyones mind about this but thought I'd give a perspective from someone who does live with this protocol. It also covers another aspect of this lifestyle that is often ignored. In the beginning of a relationship if a Dom sets rules he/she should be prepared to give reasons for them. The communication and dialog will be beneficial to both. The topic- "What is the relationship GOAL". The rules/protocol should be directed to that goal, and they should make sense to BOTH parties. This style of protocol originated by those who tried to emulate the more militant style of the Old Guard while applying "old fashioned" het values. quote:
For us - the goal was 24/7 live in real time M/s. We've achieved it, we are working very hard to maintain it. And as much as outside vanilla issues try to interfere, we resort to our Contract and Rules to remind us what is truly important; not me not beth - US. BTW 'Wolfspet' - What about possessive names for submissives derived from their Dom's name. Why doesn't that bother you??? That is your style, fine, but once again, in the spirit of the OP, I don't have to like it, anymore than you have to like my style. Wolfspet is actually a accurate description of WHO I am. I am a pet, a toy, a friend, a confidante and a subordinate. He is my Owner, my Master, my friend. He is not some mythical being that is deserving of adoration, as the term "One" implies. he is a falliable man who has taken a hold of me emotionally and physically and enslaved me to him.
|