emdoub
Posts: 223
Joined: 10/22/2006 From: Minnenipples, Minnesnowta Status: offline
|
I really am tired of tussling, but c'mon, folks.... quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyHugs Dear emdoub, Ladies and Gentlemen; Um... is there a reason I don't fit into either of the other categories? Maybe you know me Real Life(tm)? quote:
ORIGINAL: Me, I guess... Ain't it lovelerly, when you see someone either dominating or proto-domming (collar of protection, collar of consideration, testing collar, collar of the week) someone whom they obviously respect and hold in high regard? quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyHugs I need to respond as far as the 'collar of consideration.' I'm from the Old School way of doing things, which wasn't a velcro and or collar to be taken lightly. It was the first stage of obtaining the slave collar. That said, there are personality changes when it is in the courting stage and or dating slave into a serious relationship, with the intent of becoming a slave that lives within someone's home 24/7. There have been times slaves think that 24/7 is for them and when they are exposed to such experiences--not always is it what they think it is. The fantasy myth and or imagination bubble is broken. This is why consideration was used in my day. Exporing the reality takes steps. Although the collar of consideration is of a time and mind of a different era; it should be said that some of us who use the Collar of Consideration in the process of creating and making a concrete relationship will find being in with the testing collar and collar of the week rather uncomfortable. But, like with anything--even collars; they are subjected to abuse like everything in life. Intending no disrespect, Lady Hugs, but I've been around for a bit, and the first I ever heard of 'collar of consideration' was in about '99 or so. Until then, there were simply two types of collar - those with buckles (or snaps, or velcro, or whatever fastener worked), and those without - the ones that wouldn't come off intact. The permanant collar showed a tad more faith and commitment, but they were respected pretty much equally. What a collar meant was "they're mine, dammit". Finis. The collar may stay on for a scene, or a date, or a weekend, or a year - but while it was on, it meant one thing. Then, in spitting distance of 2000 (the year before the turn of the millennium), there came up specific collars. Training, consideration, protection, what have you. Now, a training collar, I can sort of understand - "I act as if I own them for purposes of training them in ______" - an intentionally finite relationship, no matter how well it goes. The rest of them say to me "I wanna act as if I own 'em, but without the responsibility that entails" - which is not a stance I have a whole lot of respect for. If that's what works for you and yours, fine - nuna my bidness, and I hope y'all have a wonderful time doing things in ways different from me. But please don't give me this 'oldtimer' routine, explaining how the Olde Guard did things - because while I'm not Olde Guarde my ownself, I know several of 'em - and I've never known any of them to use any collar that needed a name. Now, if you have something that'll show me to be wrong, I'd be happy to see it - learning new things is fun, mostly. Or maybe you just use the word 'era' differently than I do - in which case, I'd like to be enlightened. Midnight Writer
_____________________________
Benevolent Dictator of TIES - Tremendously Intense Erotic Situations. If you're local to Mpls-St.Paul, MN, you may want to check us out. The web site is at http://www.ties-bdsm.org and the Munches are monthly.
|