daddysprop247
Posts: 1712
Joined: 6/24/2005 From: DC Metro area Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LotusSong Actually, for me, it depends on the foreskin. Some roll nicely back and out of the way and you would not think they were NOT circumcised.. others cover the glans so completely they make it look like its a tube worm (not pretty). i agree, that's not pretty. my ex was like that...his foreskin never naturally pulled back from the head of his cock...if you wanted to actually see the head of his cock, which i only did like twice the year we were together, you had to physically slide it back with your hand, which actually hurt him. and it was gross under there...yellow gunky lookin' stuff. he probably never bothered pulling it back for bathing. i don't care about cut vs. uncut in general, but he was an extreme case. he was also the only man i was ever with who didn't orgasm from my giving him head. since we separated, he's gotten circumcised, and surprise surprise...he can cum from getting head now. so it wasn't me. *whew*
|