Dtesmoac -> RE: Europeans OK anti-obesity charter (11/18/2006 2:43:44 PM)
|
Just in reply to your comment about providing healthier school meals; this was introduced in the UK from September this year, and guess what? The kids dont eat it, because they dont like it. Instead they leave the premises to go to MacVomit or the fish and chip shop, or, and this was the stupidest thing; we had TV pictures of moms handing more over-salted fatty chemical laden crap through the school fence, to their kids, and taking orders from other kids to go and fetch them more of the same. If you think its bad in the UK you should see what it's like in the US schools, we have just started having our son have packed lunches because he has put on so much weight since coming out to the US. The earlier UK scheme to make children eat fruit each day was good in principle but the fruit they bought was of the cheapest nastiest type, net result was that lots of children associated fruit with pappy apples or past best or under ripe bananas. Jamie Olivers scheme is good but you need to increase the quality of the ingredients and decrease the cost to a pont where even the most ardent - "make them eat crap" parents start to use the system. At the same tiime you train the taste buds of the children. Also you make them stay in school during lunch time. They are their to be educated and health / nutrition education should be part of it. Minimal increase in tax - probably none at all in long run will result in less "social problems" at lunch times near to schools, reduced medical costs in the long run, a better direct way of providing child benefit to children, plus a generation ready to pass on the true taste of food to their children. - o yes lets prosecute the parents handing the cips out for child abuse (this is tounge in cheek "I think" mmmm but then again !!!)
|
|
|
|