CreativeDominant
Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: mellomyst i am a sub to my master who is aslo my fiance, we dont have any set limits/times when i am his little pet or his fiancee, sometimes playing can go over into the vanilla time in our life when i would prefer it not to, but on the whole i am always happily below him in everyday life. just wondered if anyone else was like this :) I can see where it would be a delicate, difficult situation. It sounds to me like what you are saying is that there is a "play" time for you. During this time, he is dominant and you are submissive. However, you are not yet...and may not choose to be...involved in a 24/7 dominant/submissive mode. Because of that, you do not ....appreciate...when he chooses to exert dominance at a time when you are being vanilla. If what I've said above fits you, then here's my feelings on it: If he disciplines you when you are in vanilla mode and this correction is not something you would allow from him, then it is possible he is using the D/s mode to make you do what he wants during a time when you do not feel that you should. Of course, I will also play the devil's advocate here and state that it is possible that something may be occurring during the D/s mode that makes you decide to "act up" once the D/s mode is over. Or that you could be acting up and stating that the D/s mode is over and he was not aware that it was. See all the confusing things that can happen? Try to make it simpler. If you are going to live a "divided" life, then specify where one ends and the other begins. If he has full control of you when you are in a D/s BDSM mode but not when in vanilla mode, it is especially important tht you define a line and have some sort of signal with each other when one begins and when one ends. There should also be some rules...what they would be for you, I am not sure. If I was to enter into a part time D/s and part time vanilla relationship with a submissive partner and part of that negotiation included the (extreme example here) agreed to concession that in D/s mode, she would submit to "anything" in terms of orders and then, when we are in D/s mode I give her an order and she says "Wait...I am not in D/s mode now", that would have me upset. Or if she followed through on the order but, because she didn't like it or thought I had been unfair to give it, waited until we were back in vanilla mode and then set about "pay back". I think your post is very good evidence for those whole ideas, expressed on here before, of communication and clearly defined boundaries.
|