Why did the republicans, YO! look pls

Why did the republicans, YO! look pls (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

pahunkboy -> Why did the republicans, YO! look pls (11/21/2006 10:10:05 AM)
Has anyone noticed that the bush agenda never mentioned reversing Brady? Why? BTW- you may not own a hand gun, or taser, if you cant own a firearm, and it dont have to be a felony either. Some of my best friends....had to go below ground.

popeye1250 -> RE: Why did the republicans, YO! look pls (11/21/2006 10:57:45 AM)
Pahunk, and what is this all about? You're not very clear about what you're talking about.

Archer -> RE: Why did the republicans, YO! look pls (11/21/2006 10:58:15 AM)
Because it was accepted as enough that tthe Attourny general started off the Bush presidency with a statement specificly sayng that they viewed the 2nd ammendment as an individual right not a collective one. It was enough of a bone for the gun rights folks so long as the Government was controled by Republicans no new restrictions would be enacted. They also had moved to the instacheck system nation wide as part of the regulation and thus the wait period was eliminated, as well as the other sticking point of tossing the application information after 90 days from when the purchase was approved . Administratively the big issues were handled.

pahunkboy -> RE: Why did the republicans, YO! look pls (11/21/2006 11:03:09 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: popeye1250 Pahunk, and what is this all about? You're not very clear about what you're talking about. they should dump the Brady bill. thats my opinion. it is too restrictive.

pahunkboy -> RE: Why did the republicans, YO! look pls (11/21/2006 11:05:32 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Archer Because it was accepted as enough that tthe Attourny general started off the Bush presidency with a statement specificly sayng that they viewed the 2nd ammendment as an individual right not a collective one. It was enough of a bone for the gun rights folks so long as the Government was controled by Republicans no new restrictions would be enacted. They also had moved to the instacheck system nation wide as part of the regulation and thus the wait period was eliminated, as well as the other sticking point of tossing the application information after 90 days from when the purchase was approved . Administratively the big issues were handled. well then I guess we will see when I go to renew my fire arms license. they never asked for it back.

Lenis -> RE: Why did the republicans, YO! look pls (11/21/2006 1:16:14 PM)
Brady has been allowed to sunset, at least the useless "Assualt Weapons Ban" has. Also, even though a lot of republicans lost their seats, a lot of Democrats who were elected to take their place are very much pro-RKBA. Its good to see that there are some out there that are pro-2nd on this sight. Me and my slave do not feel to alone now. -Brian

popeye1250 -> RE: Why did the republicans, YO! look pls (11/21/2006 3:41:39 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: pahunkboy quote: ORIGINAL: popeye1250 Pahunk, and what is this all about? You're not very clear about what you're talking about. they should dump the Brady bill. thats my opinion. it is too restrictive. Oh ok yes they should. Also a "permit" for one state should be good for all states just like a driver's lisense. As for needing "permits" to carry a gun they really should be done away with Nationwide. I just don't think you should need a "permit" to excercise a right. That's how they do it i Vermont. No "permit" needed. Lenis, plenty of people in here are lisensed to carry just like any other group of people!

michaelOfGeorgia -> RE: Why did the republicans, YO! look pls (11/21/2006 3:43:19 PM)
quote: Has anyone noticed that the bush agenda never mentioned reversing Brady? ummm, no...i don't watch the news. i can always find something more interesting to watch.

philosophy -> RE: Why did the republicans, YO! look pls (11/21/2006 3:45:00 PM)
......i thought this thread was going to be about some cunning republican plot regarding the Brady Bunch......

Page: [1]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125