|
Archer -> RE: Younger Masters? (11/27/2006 1:52:04 PM)
|
See there it goes again I don't think anyone here argueing for age being a factor has made the age= quality
The argument tends to be that years of life experience to draw from (ALL OTHER THINGS EQUAL) will make for a better Dominant.
How could it not if everything else is equal
If Jack is 30 5 years in the lifetyle, mentored under John, 140 IQ, level 6 common sense, level 6 commitment to learning, ...
Bill is 20 5 years in the lifestyle mentored under John 140 IQ, level 6 common sense, level 6 commitment to learning...
Then you could fairly safe in assuming that Jack will be better by virtue of the cross over of general life experience of 10 additional years of life.
Of course omparing two people you never have a real all other things being equal, so in the end you find as many variables between the people and you weigh and measure and in the end you have a very subjective rather than objective evaluation.
|
|
|
|
