RE: Male Abuse (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


SirKenin -> RE: Male Abuse (11/28/2006 11:49:27 AM)

lol.  I agree with the Mod.  Whoa.

<remainder deleted>

[Mod Note:  And that's where it should have ended.  No parting shots are required or warranted here as they'll just keep the flames flying.]




juliaoceania -> RE: Male Abuse (11/28/2006 1:16:22 PM)

 
quote:

mean...does someone with a perfectly clear and uninjured body just walk into a police station and claim their spouse clocked them with a shoe?  I would imagine you'd have to show a mark.  So unless these people are self-injuring and staggering into the police station with a stiletto heel that they stuck in their own damn eye , how the hell are all these innocent spouses (male or female here) going to prison for abuse?


My brother was almost arrested for spousal abuse even though he did not hit his wife. She chased him out of their home and in front of the neighbors tore the shirt off his body. He then proceded to hold her wrists while she attempted to beat him to protect himself from her... all in full view of the neighbors... after she had exhausted herself he let go of her and she called the cops on him, and claimed he had held her down and abused her... she had marks on her wrists where he had held them.

The cops were getting ready to load him into the car when two neighbors came and stopped them by corroborating his rendition of what happened. If they had been unwilling to involve themselves or had not been home his ass would have been parked in jail on a spousal abuse charge.




seeksfemslave -> RE: Male Abuse (11/28/2006 1:39:28 PM)

I suppose to repeat my self but the really serious underlying problem as I see it is not so much that either Women or Men will lie and give half truths to try to make their case, what seems to have happened over the last few years is that Women appear to be thought to be so "relation ship perfect" as to be incapable of, to use a fancy word , dissembly.  ie if a Women says a Man abused  her, thats it, the Man must be in the wrong. As you can see many posters in this thread know this is untrue but unfortunately the PC thinkers who at the moment have too much influence believe it.




SirKenin -> RE: Male Abuse (11/28/2006 2:10:45 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: seeksfemslave

I suppose to repeat my self but the really serious underlying problem as I see it is not so much that either Women or Men will lie and give half truths to try to make their case, what seems to have happened over the last few years is that Women appear to be thought to be so "relation ship perfect" as to be incapable of, to use a fancy word , dissembly.  ie if a Women says a Man abused  her, thats it, the Man must be in the wrong. As you can see many posters in this thread know this is untrue but unfortunately the PC thinkers who at the moment have too much influence believe it.


This is very true, as quite obviously seen in this thread, and very disturbing.  The pendulum has swung too far in the wrong direction, as is getting to be the case more and more often.  You have to be so careful.  I have mentioned this before, but My dad was a teacher for quite a number of years.  The problem of abuse accusations became so bad that they could not even spend time with the students to help them with the schoolwork.  The situation has gotten out of control.  That policeman made it perfectly clear to Me that it was I who was suspect and if they were given any incling of a notion that they could be right I was going to jail and that is all there was to it.    Talk about a screwed up legal system.




marieToo -> RE: Male Abuse (11/28/2006 2:36:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

quote:

mean...does someone with a perfectly clear and uninjured body just walk into a police station and claim their spouse clocked them with a shoe?  I would imagine you'd have to show a mark.  So unless these people are self-injuring and staggering into the police station with a stiletto heel that they stuck in their own damn eye , how the hell are all these innocent spouses (male or female here) going to prison for abuse?


My brother was almost arrested for spousal abuse even though he did not hit his wife. She chased him out of their home and in front of the neighbors tore the shirt off his body. He then proceded to hold her wrists while she attempted to beat him to protect himself from her... all in full view of the neighbors... after she had exhausted herself he let go of her and she called the cops on him, and claimed he had held her down and abused her... she had marks on her wrists where he had held them.

The cops were getting ready to load him into the car when two neighbors came and stopped them by corroborating his rendition of what happened. If they had been unwilling to involve themselves or had not been home his ass would have been parked in jail on a spousal abuse charge.


I think in your brother's case they call it basic instinct.  I think if someone comes at you that way, most people would defend themselves, rather than stand there, hands down and just endure the beating.   

But in another circumstance the opposite could've been true.  I wonder how difficult it must be for law officials in these types of cases to discern (when there are no witnesses) who is being truthful.  My guess is that in alot of cases, its nearly impossible, since both men and woman can be abusive and both men and women (I think) will usually try to deter the other from causing bodily harm.   Im not defending the system, I know there is injustice in it everywhere, but it must be very very difficult to know who is guilty.

If Im not being too nosey....How did it turn out for your brother? Did they manage to patch things up?




marieToo -> RE: Male Abuse (11/28/2006 2:52:33 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: seeksfemslave

I suppose to repeat my self but the really serious underlying problem as I see it is not so much that either Women or Men will lie and give half truths to try to make their case, what seems to have happened over the last few years is that Women appear to be thought to be so "relation ship perfect" as to be incapable of, to use a fancy word , dissembly.  ie if a Women says a Man abused  her, thats it, the Man must be in the wrong. As you can see many posters in this thread know this is untrue but unfortunately the PC thinkers who at the moment have too much influence believe it.


I dont know, Seeks. Do you really think a female walks into a police station, claims that someone hit her and they go and arrest the person?

Im a person who has been tossed around the legal system for about 3 yrs now, (The details shall go unmentioned) theres alot of bullshit that goes on, I'll be the first to say.  The judges dont care, the lawyers are interested only in $$ etc etc.  And I once had cops at my door when a my ex and I were going through our divorce and things escalated between us one day (nothing physical) But the cops took a report from each of us.  I would like to know if anyone has any documented cases that they could link me to where males or females for that matter were sentenced to jail terms soley on the basis of their spouses word,  without investigation, without a history being taken, without legal counsel and without going through the system.  Thanks.




marieToo -> RE: Male Abuse (11/28/2006 3:01:15 PM)

<quick highjack> sorry folks.

ng-please email me your oustide email addy if you want to, as I cannot reply throught the CM system.  my "send mail" doesnt work.




SirKenin -> RE: Male Abuse (11/28/2006 3:05:41 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: marieToo  I would like to know if anyone has any documented cases that they could link me to where males or females for that matter were sentenced to jail terms soley on the basis of their spouses word,  without investigation, without a history being taken, without legal counsel and without going through the system.  Thanks.


hahaha.  An impossible request.  You set yourself up to be able to say "see!  I told you so."  In order for a person to be sentenced to jail, an investigation of some sort MUST be undertaken.  The police look in the computer for a history on the accused.  The "system" is the legal system, and that involves the police and the Courts.  And obviously you can not be sentenced to jail without going to Court or going through the police..   So your request is completely ridiculous.

Although..  I have been sentenced based on someone's word against Mine.  I received two years probation for something I did not do, with no prior history of any type of criminal offence whatsoever.  I can not link you to it.  Either you can take My word or not, it matters not to Me.




marieToo -> RE: Male Abuse (11/28/2006 3:12:11 PM)

*deleted*




SirKenin -> RE: Male Abuse (11/28/2006 3:17:49 PM)

What?  I am not doing anything wrong.  You asked for an answer..  You got it.  Maybe not the one you were looking for, nor who you were looking for it from, but this is an open forum.  And the fact of the matter is that the question was doomed right from the start.  So, perhaps rethinking your thought might be in order.  That is all I am saying (and I must add that I do have a right to say it.  You did not like it when others tried to silence you, remember).




LadyEllen -> RE: Male Abuse (11/28/2006 3:19:20 PM)

What I understand, from my involvement with the police here in UK - I'm a part time adviser btw!

You make a complaint against a person
The police investigate the complaint, including an informal "chat" with the person
If there is sufficient initial evidence to support the complaint, the person is arrested
They then make further, more formal investigations to gather evidence
If there is sufficient formal evidence the person is charged, and either cautioned, bailed or kept in custody if no bail
The Crown Prosecution Service (a bit like the DA), assesses the evidence and decides whether to prosecute
If the prosecution goes ahead, a court date is arranged and the person ordered to attend if on bail
Court process, ending in acquital or sentence

E




marieToo -> RE: Male Abuse (11/28/2006 3:28:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

What I understand, from my involvement with the police here in UK - I'm a part time adviser btw!

You make a complaint against a person
The police investigate the complaint, including an informal "chat" with the person
If there is sufficient initial evidence to support the complaint, the person is arrested
They then make further, more formal investigations to gather evidence
If there is sufficient formal evidence the person is charged, and either cautioned, bailed or kept in custody if no bail
The Crown Prosecution Service (a bit like the DA), assesses the evidence and decides whether to prosecute
If the prosecution goes ahead, a court date is arranged and the person ordered to attend if on bail
Court process, ending in acquital or sentence

E



Thanks Ellen.

I guess it could be the informal chat thing where it matters alot on how you convince an officer, I dont know.  In my case (and this was not a spousal abuse issue) but I called the police because I was getting scared as the argument escalated.  Two cops showed up and they each took one of us. lol.  They took each of our separate stories, calmed us both down. (I was nervous and shook up, the ex was pissed) then they left.  Im not minimizing anyone's experiences because in my case there was no physical abuse, or arrest, but the cops did make sure to get both sides of the story and they spoke to us separately not in front of each other.




LadyEllen -> RE: Male Abuse (11/28/2006 4:05:39 PM)

Marie - sounds to me like you had two good officers there.
E




juliaoceania -> RE: Male Abuse (11/28/2006 4:11:46 PM)

Unfortunately his wife and him patched it up for several years after this one incidence, and they have now been divorced for over a decade.

I will say Marie, my exhusband and I split and I had a restraining order put on him to establish custody of my son in my county without filing divorce. He threatened to pick my son up while I was gone and keep him. In essense I was afraid he would kidnap my son out of my custody. I was a nursing mother at the time. I never once said he abused me or my son in the request for a restraining order, just that he threatened to remove my son from my home. I never claimed to be in fear of him... but my ex later told me that the constable that served him with papers gave him a veiled threat that if he ignored the restraining order that they would see to it that he "resisted arrest"... there is more than one way to skin a cat, and the authorities have their own way of discerning the truth of what is without being "told".. yes my ex was abusive, even physically, and yes that constable called me before he delivered the papers to my ex, and yes I was afraid of him and that was probably apparent in the conversation... but I never said he hit me, it was assumed, and that bothered me on a deep level. I felt it was unfair, even though there was no love lost between my ex and I, even though I felt I had to protect myself from him legally. I really was not afraid my exhusband was going to go psycho on me, and I did not want to abuse the system by claiming to be afraid of that when I was not... too many women DO lie about such things.

I have this male child, lord help a woman that thinks she is going to beat the crap out of him and thinks she can get away with it, he is as much of a human being as anyone else... and while I raised him to be nice and respectful of girls, I do not share the obligation to be nice if some woman started using him as a punching bag... WEG. I think I view this from the angle of having men in my life that I adore and love. I know they have feelings. I know that if you hit anyone they bleed. Somehow I find it disturbing that on one hand we expect men to be tender and kind to us, and yet we do not feel obligated to return that kindness and genuine tenderness back to them. Like has been mentioned, it is ok to insult men in the eyes of many, I do not agree with that. I do not find it funny to be honest. I get offended by it. We are all human beings, and if people expect one set of human beings to be one way, and the other set of human beings is not held up to the same accountability that is just wrong.

I do think that women often have the shorter end of the stick in many ways compared to men, especially on the financial end of the stick, but that does not give us the right to be denigrating to the male gender... and I am not talking about you specifically Marie, but others that I have seen do this on many other threads more than on this one, I wanted to make sure you did not take every comment in this post to be to you personally, because for the most part this post is toward the board in general.




marieToo -> RE: Male Abuse (11/28/2006 5:16:04 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

Unfortunately his wife and him patched it up for several years after this one incidence, and they have now been divorced for over a decade.

I will say Marie, my exhusband and I split and I had a restraining order put on him to establish custody of my son in my county without filing divorce. He threatened to pick my son up while I was gone and keep him. In essense I was afraid he would kidnap my son out of my custody. I was a nursing mother at the time. I never once said he abused me or my son in the request for a restraining order, just that he threatened to remove my son from my home. I never claimed to be in fear of him... but my ex later told me that the constable that served him with papers gave him a veiled threat that if he ignored the restraining order that they would see to it that he "resisted arrest"... there is more than one way to skin a cat, and the authorities have their own way of discerning the truth of what is without being "told".. yes my ex was abusive, even physically, and yes that constable called me before he delivered the papers to my ex, and yes I was afraid of him and that was probably apparent in the conversation... but I never said he hit me, it was assumed, and that bothered me on a deep level. I felt it was unfair, even though there was no love lost between my ex and I, even though I felt I had to protect myself from him legally. I really was not afraid my exhusband was going to go psycho on me, and I did not want to abuse the system by claiming to be afraid of that when I was not... too many women DO lie about such things.

I have this male child, lord help a woman that thinks she is going to beat the crap out of him and thinks she can get away with it, he is as much of a human being as anyone else... and while I raised him to be nice and respectful of girls, I do not share the obligation to be nice if some woman started using him as a punching bag... WEG. I think I view this from the angle of having men in my life that I adore and love. I know they have feelings. I know that if you hit anyone they bleed.  Like has been mentioned, it is ok to insult men in the eyes of many, I do not agree with that. I do not find it funny to be honest. I get offended by it. We are all human beings, and if people expect one set of human beings to be one way, and the other set of human beings is not held up to the same accountability that is just wrong.

I do think that women often have the shorter end of the stick in many ways compared to men, especially on the financial end of the stick, but that does not give us the right to be denigrating to the male gender... and I am not talking about you specifically Marie, but others that I have seen do this on many other threads more than on this one, I wanted to make sure you did not take every comment in this post to be to you personally, because for the most part this post is toward the board in general.



Well, the topic went way off track because my thought process went in a direction of "end the abuse".  When I think you were more going for a discussion specific to male abuse.  So I think my post derailed the topic. I apologize for the hijack itself, but regret nothing I said.  Anyway..........

As far as direct talk about the topic.  I understand and empathize with your story.  I was afraid during my divorce too and almost filed the restraining order but he apologized for the outburst that scared me and it never got that bad again.  My attorney wanted to also believe that since he was aggressive and very intimidating that he was also abusive, but I told her he had never hit me, verbal abuse sucks too, but somehow I dont take it as seriously.  I told her he was not abusive.   He Busted some holes through the walls and things of that nature, came at me like he was going to hit me with clenched fists, but never did actually hit me. 

I dont discount your points about how some women might stretch the truth or lie completely....But I dont think that in general men get railroaded by lying women,  or that it's automatically assumed that men are wrong.  It happens...YES.  But I can't agree that it's the rule.  
What about the fact that women's prisons in America are overflowing with women who have been charged with assault and battery, not just in burglary etc but many against men in other types of situations.  If it was the general trendy legal belief that a woman couldnt possibly violate a man physically, there wouldnt be so many women in jail for such charges.
I think both sides get the bum rap in our fucked up system. I really do.
I can swallow that injustices CAN and DO happen every single day in all sorts of cases.  But I think they happen in both directions. Look at how many men are railroaded into prison on false rape charges.  Then years later they have DNA testing that proves the guy never did it.  But then on the other hand, look at how many men get away with rape because it turns out that the girl had been drinking and flirting with him at a party therefore it is assumed that when she said "no" she couldnt possibly have meant it.
On a milder note....Think about after a divorce....It's classic....when you hear men talking....they all say "she got it all. Im broke. She took me for everything I had".....and then you hear the women say "he doesn't give me a dime that bastard, I dont have enough money to buy the kids clothes". I have to do it all".  

Because I clearly see both sides getting fucked, depending on the circumstances, the judge, and the position of the friggin stars in the sky on that day, I have a hard time wrapping my head around the fact that there's some new political trend of sorts that all these females are having their spouses locked up for 10 years because of a black and blue on their wrists.  Im sorry.  I can't grip that. And I am someone who has probably witnessed a little more legal injustice than the average person, so Im already predjusticed to some extent against the system. 

(I am by no means a man hater, in fact I wish I could find one who would put up with me long enough to hit me.  Id never report it , I swear!) Ok...seriously.... 

On the male/spousal abuse issue specifically---The one-time incidences (like with your brother) who then patched it up...sometimes those incidences happen between couples...then they seek counseling or anger management.  Sometimes someone just gets pissed off and throws something, but they work on their issues to improve it.  I think those type of cases tend to be easier to deal with in the legal system because most people aren't going to be sentenced for a first offense of slapping someone in the face, or kicking someone in the nuts...one time or even two times.   Some spouses will even calm down and decide not to press charges.  (Though Im sure some do go through with it.)  But first time minor assault against a spouse probably isnt going to land a wife or husband in jail for very long,  if at all.  They might get fines, probation, 30 days behind bars etc.  Though I cant swear to the stats on this, without looking up some info.  I will conceed if someone in the system has some numbers to offer up on this.

BUT when there is a history of abuse between 2 people for years, I have a seriously seriously hard time believing that only ONE person in 10 years raised a hand,  and only ONE person in 10 yrs sat there and took it, unless they have zero level of basic instinct.  (As a submissive if a hand is coming at me to slap me in the face, and it's my Dominant's I dont wince.)  But if I'm in an abusive situation, and scared and a hand is coming at me, Im going to block it?  Isn't it instictive to at least put your hand up?  Or duck out of the way? Run in the other direction?  maybe try to block them?  I dont know.  Im not saying that there haven't been cases where this may have been the case where someone is extremely mentally beaten down, where they sit there as if in a coma while someone strikes them,   Im saying that I find it more likely that in most of these cases of Male OR female the abuse is more likely 'mutual abuse'.  

And I have no shame in admitting that if someone chucks a roast beef sandwich at me, Im gonna nail them with the potato salad. 




sleazy -> RE: Male Abuse (11/28/2006 5:34:42 PM)

Ok, Im only part way through reading all this thread, but I had to comment on this particular point.

quote:

ORIGINAL: marieToo
Also people do not get put in jail on a claim that someone makes.  If someone (woman or man) has a knot on their head where their spouse nailed them with a frying pan, well, I guess thats abuse, regardless of who threw what first.  I mean, if you dont bruise, cut, or leave an injury on someone's body, then no one can run to the cops and claim they were hit with something. I mean...does someone with a perfectly clear and uninjured body just walk into a police station and claim their spouse clocked them with a shoe?  I would imagine you'd have to show a mark.  So unless these people are self-injuring and staggering into the police station with a stiletto heel that they stuck in their own damn eye , how the hell are all these innocent spouses (male or female here) going to prison for abuse?


This may be true in NJ, here in the UK it is quite possible, in fact almost compulsory, to be arrested and interviewed under caution (ie miranda-ized sp?) so that anything you say becomes evidence, in cases with any domestic overtones where the police are called. This then means you are printed, photographed, a DNA sample taken, and should you work in certain proffesions lose your job automatically even if nothing progresses any further.


Edited now having read thru' the entire thread

My experiences seem to support the initial concept, as a male I am in the eyes of most of society incapable of being abused, and should I appear to be abused I must be an abuser that did something to deserve it.

For many years, even decades, spousal abuse (male upon female) was a very serious and under reported occurence, slowly the system and support networks have grown up to recognise and deal with this, and also with many other similar changes in perceptions, be it based on race, religion and some choices in sexuality. However as a white male it does seem that the system and society are against me should I be a victim, as white males have for so long been the oppressors it is deemed only fair (or so it seems) that I should suffer the way other victims did 10, 20, 30 however many years ago.

Just to put this in perspective, many years ago my wife left me, her choice she simply felt we had nothing left. I had the children as she left to live somewhere unsuitable and I was remaining in the family home where they at least felt some stability and comfort. One evening I took a friend and their child to hospital in my car, (beside the point but I confess to a couple of traffic violations en route). What happened within the hospital I have no idea, but the net result was me financially out of pocket, formally interviewed by the police regarding child abuse. Finally during the divorce this was brought up, and the very fact I had been interviewed and cleared (or at the very least NFA'd) was used consistently against me by my wife, resulting in constant investigations by social services, doctors, hospitals, a thousand and one other specialists (most of whom didnt even have kids of their own!) The very fact I was a male who loved his family (Ever get a funny look for saying you love your own daughter?!) was constantly used against me, after all no man getting a divorce could ever be a good father, could he?

In short, yes the system, and society as a whole are weighted against the man, no matter the situation. I apologise for making note of my race in this post, but here in the UK adding racial, religous, or domestic to any crime label automatically moves the offence up the scale of possible punishments, and seems to be very much a case of guilty until proven innocent rather than the more traditional way round.




juliaoceania -> RE: Male Abuse (11/28/2006 7:45:56 PM)

quote:

What about the fact that women's prisons in America are overflowing with women who have been charged with assault and battery, not just in burglary etc but many against men in other types of situations.  If it was the general trendy legal belief that a woman couldnt possibly violate a man physically, there wouldnt be so many women in jail for such charges.


My brother inlaw works at a women's prison, most women are in prison for non-violent crimes, not man abuse. Things like flying kites, drug sales and use.


quote:

And I have no shame in admitting that if someone chucks a roast beef sandwich at me, Im gonna nail them with the potato salad. 



As someone that was thrown through a door, had my eye blackened, nose nearly broken , and many other smaller abuses I can tell you the first time you went to hit back and were back handed you would seriously not fight back again. I did not stay for long enough to have an escalation of violence that left me in the hospital, but it may have went that far if I had stayed. What made it ok to leave? He left me in another state so he could play for a couple of months, and when he decided to come back for me I had broken free... who knows what would have happened had I remained with him in the home, it may have taken years longer to get the courage to turn away. There is a slow breaking of the spirit that occurs when one is abused, it is a psychological thing Marie, cannot explain what happens in your head whether male of female. It is a subtle undermining of one's self esteem and the more a person doubts themselves, the more it feeds the abuser. I cannot explain it, and it really knows no gender, because the victim of the abuse is primed for it before the first blow is landed.. the literature on the topic is pretty well known, and the victimization process is not gender specific.




kittensmailbox -> RE: Male Abuse (11/28/2006 7:52:47 PM)

A few woman learned to stand up for themselves and say "Screw this, i am not going to take it any more"...




skiesel93 -> RE: Male Abuse (11/28/2006 8:11:21 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: jblack

I'm glad that this topic is being pursued in a serious way; it's a serious topic.

As many of you have pointed out, men are abused by women. This abuse does carry a specific kind of stigma because--as much as it should NOT be this way--there is an underlying, widespread social acceptance of violence against women. If a woman is abused, raped, or otherwise violated, there is a social system designed to both further abuse and protect her (that the justice system for you, I guess). But there is less of a system in place if one is man; we simply do not believe that such abuse happens, even though it does.

However, that does not make either form of abuse any "worse" than the other form. It doesn't make it "easier" for a women because society accepts the fact that men abuse women, and it doesn't make it "easier" for a man because society gives men more power. In both cases, abuse has been perpetuated, and the consequences of that abuse will probably be different for each person.

Because the violence against women is so much more prevalent and widespread, it often appears as a greater threat in terms of our society in general. This seems particularly apt when considering how many men kill women each year. Women do kill men, yes, but not nearly on the scale that men kill women. Women do abuse men, yes, but nearly as often as men abuse women. Men are molested, yes, but not nearly as often as women are raped. Violence against women seems like a bigger social problem because it is a bigger social problem.

But it is not a "bigger" personal problem. To the person that's being abused, the statistics matter, but they don't matter as much as the painful dynamic. A man who is abused will suffer, and his suffering will be different from the suffering felt by a woman because of the patriarchical systems already in place. But that doesn't mean that either suffering should be discounted in any way.

It's too bad that people (i.e., Assclown) try to set up this issue as a polarizing one. It's not about men vs. women. It's about violence and how to respond to violence in a culture that (let's face it) perpetuates violence all the time. Like I said from the start, a serious topic.



Good points, Jblack! And I've had it with these motherfucking snakes on this motherfucking plane!




juliaoceania -> RE: Male Abuse (11/28/2006 8:13:27 PM)

Most women do, I am one of them. Abusers are charming, charismatic, silver tongued, manipulative, and they do not start out being assholes. I would assume the same for women as it is for men... they do not start off beating the crap out of a person, they wait until the emotional investment is there... in my case the smaller abuses took place while I was pregnant. The first time a man hits a woman is usually during their first pregnancy... just a little statistic for you. I was married to him for about 6 months and with him for almost two years the first time he got physical with me. And by that time the ties that bound me to him were pretty solid. We were splitsville before our second wedding anniversary.




Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 [6] 7   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.09375