CreativeDominant -> RE: normal behavior? (11/27/2006 5:41:57 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: wingedangel Thanks to everyone for your responses. Like I said, I enjoy the play part. I would normally say a sit down, face to face, talk would be in order, but with 2500 miles between us, that is kind of hard and I am not keen on the idea of flying out there only to have that talk and not resolve things to a point I can live with. I was hoping the email would be a way of doing that, and he did reply, briefly, to say how much he appreciated my efforts in opening up to him, but no, he did not address my concerns specifically. I am torn as to what I want to do. On one hand, I really, really want the intensity of the play we do. On the other, I am not content to just feel cast aside when he is finished. I don't think casual play necessarily has to be so cold and distant, but I do have doubts as to whether he thinks the same way. You've received some good answers so far. No, you are right...casual play does not have to mean emotionless play nor does it have to mean that the responsibility for the physical and mental well-being of the submissive, or the dominant for that matter, have to be cast aside at the end of the play. As others have noted, that does appear to be his M.O. though. You can either change yourself and become inured to his after-play behavior or you can let it be known that you do not wish to change the vulnerability you feel after a scene nor try to swallow down the need you have for some "down-comfort-help me back to a 'human' level again'- time" with the dominant who took you to a level that you need help back from. It is not wrong on your part to want this. It is not necessarily wrong on his part...though I personally disagree with it...to be who he is. It IS wrong, without a beneficial-to-the-other change in one of you, to continue on in this manner as right now, I see only one person ending up hurt or sadly, cynical and callous...and that would be you.
|
|
|
|