Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

On being a "pet"


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Submissive >> On being a "pet" Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
On being a "pet" - 12/3/2006 11:54:27 AM   
petdave


Posts: 2479
Status: offline
i wrote the following about ten years ago, and at the time, there didn't seem to be nearly so many "pet" submissives in the various on-line venues. So i wrote it to explain my own choice of moniker. And i'm curious, to others who have chosen that term, what brought you to it?

***

So why do i call myself a pet, when i am not of one of your traditional pet-type species?
Well, the answer to that question is not an easy one. The whole... realm, i guess you could say, of BDSM is not an exact science. You can point at rock and say "hey, that there's a rock!" and, while you're unlikely to get a Nobel prize for your discovery, you stand a decent chance of being correct. However, if you point at a man in a dog collar kneeling by a woman's feet, and say "that there's a submissive!", you could end up involved in a really tedious discussion. Maybe he thinks he's a slave. Maybe his lady friend thinks of him more as a bottom. Maybe he's a switch. Terminology can mean a lot, especially when it comes to something as emotionally charged as individual sexuality.

Anyway, the terminology and labels of BDSM are nebulous and far from universally accepted. There are words that come close to what i am- words like "submissive," "masochist," "slave," and "bottom" all describe people that are sorta like who i am. But not quite. So since the world of BDSM terminology is still fairly open, and since i, like many another person, seek to describe myself as accurately as possible in a vain attempt to prove my uniqueness as an individual... i've decided that i'm a pet.

Pets are loved, unconditionally. They're clearly not in charge, but a good owner would never mistreat their pet. Pets don't try to do wrong, and it has to be understood that it's not always their fault. Pets can't always help what they want, what they are, and what they need- but they can be trained. Pets want very much to please their owners, but pets have interests and needs too. They may not need to have their desires attended to immediately, but a pet whose longings are passed over for too long may begin to feel neglected and self-pitying. Pets need to to be accepted, and perhaps sometimes, even coddled.
In return, pets are devoted, and fiercely loyal. A good pet would never hurt its owner intentionally. They're obediant as a rule, though playfulness or some physical need may get the best of them at times. Pets aren't very good at making decisions, so they need to trust their owners to do what's right for them. Take care of your pet, and no one can ever take them away from you. Do you feel more content and at peace curled up naked at the feet of your significant other than anywhere else you can find? Is it easier to express your love by nuzzling against them than by trying to find the words?

***
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: On being a "pet" - 12/4/2006 7:10:42 AM   
sub4hire


Posts: 6775
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
If you wrote this ten year's ago.  Did it help you to find a ten year relationship?  Is that why you are now distributing it again in hopes of finding the right person again?
Just curious is all.  There are hundreds of threads like this one here on these boards.  Threads trying to define different words.
You obviously know that or you would'nt have posted this in an attempt to define yourself here.

I think the one you need to define yourself to is your potential partner.  Not sure if any of us here really matter in the grand scheme of things.

(in reply to petdave)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: On being a "pet" - 12/4/2006 10:38:24 AM   
petdave


Posts: 2479
Status: offline
Actually, no. i'm married and not on the market. While there are a lot of discussions on sub/slave/bottom, etc., i don't see very many on "pet", and was curious as to why other people choose to define themselves this way, as it's something that i put a lot of thought into. i also find it very interesting to read other people's views on things like this. Since the last discussion i found on a quick search was more than a year old, i thought it might be worth bringing up for discussion. But apparently not. 

...dave

(in reply to sub4hire)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: On being a "pet" - 12/4/2006 11:08:06 AM   
MsKatHouston


Posts: 1909
Joined: 6/7/2006
From: Houston, TX
Status: offline
For me, pet is simply an endearment.  It does not make the submissive any less submissive or any more cherished and cared for.  But I do like the endearment as a "pet" name.  I am sure there are others who use the term pet as a way to more narrowly define the type of submissive but as with most everything, the definitions are likely personal and will vary greatly from person to person.

Whatever works and all that ;)

_____________________________

-Kat

~If you can't be a good example, you'll just have to serve as a horrible warning~

(in reply to petdave)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: On being a "pet" - 12/4/2006 11:43:06 AM   
sub4hire


Posts: 6775
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: petdave

Since the last discussion i found on a quick search was more than a year old, i thought it might be worth bringing up for discussion. But apparently not. 

...dave



No, as I stated I was merely curious if it helped you or not.  The last discussion on what the term's mean here is probably going on somewhere right now.
I haven't read all of the forums.  Don't normally so hard to say.  Though it is one of the most talked about topics on collarme boards.

(in reply to petdave)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: On being a "pet" - 12/6/2006 5:51:28 AM   
petcerina


Posts: 143
Joined: 4/4/2005
Status: offline
How interesting... i have many points so i'll try to address them all.

i started out in BDSM through the online world when i was 14. When i was trying to come up with a name for myself, i knew i wanted it to be cerina, but sub or slave cerina didn't sound right especially since i didn't know quite what those words meant then.  i chose pet merely because i thought it sounded better.

The weird part is i'm finding more and more reasons why it was the right name for me.  i love being petted.  my hair, my face, my hands.  It's extremely soothing for me and i relish the attention.  A small pat on my head will have me smiling for 5 minutes.  i also enjoy roleplaying as a dog, but i wouldn't want to do it all the time.

i had never come across anyone else's definition of pet before.  i didn't really care since i considered myself a sub and now a slave.  However, your definition seemed to hit home.  i'll have to sleep on it to decide for sure, but thank you for sharing.

(in reply to sub4hire)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: On being a "pet" - 12/6/2006 12:59:08 PM   
CalliopePurple


Posts: 2539
Joined: 11/29/2004
From: SeaTac area
Status: offline
Though "pet" is far from what I label myself as, I enjoyed your way of putting it. And it fits how my last girlfriend behaved quite well. Maybe I can find someone else with a similar view of herself in the future. Again, nicely said.

_____________________________

Kimi ni aitakute dare yori mo aitakute
hajimete kimi ni atta hoshizora no shita de.
Kimi ni tsutaetai todokanai omoi demo
boku no kokoro wa mada kimi o sagashiteiru.

Gackt - Kimi ni Aitakute

(in reply to petcerina)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: On being a "pet" - 12/6/2006 1:28:57 PM   
shadevarr


Posts: 360
Joined: 7/2/2006
Status: offline
That is a really good definition for pet and it works really well with my new kitty :P

(in reply to CalliopePurple)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: On being a "pet" - 12/6/2006 2:48:59 PM   
sweetsubie


Posts: 82
Joined: 9/22/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: petdave


Pets are loved, unconditionally. They're clearly not in charge, but a good owner would never mistreat their pet. Pets don't try to do wrong, and it has to be understood that it's not always their fault. Pets can't always help what they want, what they are, and what they need- but they can be trained. Pets want very much to please their owners, but pets have interests and needs too. They may not need to have their desires attended to immediately, but a pet whose longings are passed over for too long may begin to feel neglected and self-pitying. Pets need to to be accepted, and perhaps sometimes, even coddled.
In return, pets are devoted, and fiercely loyal. A good pet would never hurt its owner intentionally. They're obediant as a rule, though playfulness or some physical need may get the best of them at times. Pets aren't very good at making decisions, so they need to trust their owners to do what's right for them. Take care of your pet, and no one can ever take them away from you. Do you feel more content and at peace curled up naked at the feet of your significant other than anywhere else you can find? Is it easier to express your love by nuzzling against them than by trying to find the words?

***



i think this is a fantastic way of discribing how i feel as a sub and pet brightened up my day to see it all in words cheers!

_____________________________

Sticks and stone may break my bones but whips and chains excite me!

(in reply to petdave)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: On being a "pet" - 12/7/2006 7:44:46 AM   
FemmeOwner


Posts: 120
Joined: 11/26/2006
Status: offline
This is a great thread!  I actually often use the pet analogy to describe what I am looking for in a slave as far as the mindset, the qualities that I seek rather like those of a Golden Retriever: obedient, loyal, protective, eager to please at all times, content just to be in Mistress' presence but always happy to play when she wants, crushed by having displeased and on being scolded, and deliriously ecstatic upon being praised, and always seeking approval in any way.  I mean... what's not to love???

(in reply to petdave)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: On being a "pet" - 12/7/2006 4:40:39 PM   
beltainefaerie


Posts: 610
Joined: 4/15/2006
Status: offline
I love your description and it makes sense to me. I do not get into animal play, and have therefore shied away from such terms, but your explanation makes sense.  Overall, I don't care much what people call themselves as long as they have an articulate reason.  Clearly, you've got that covered!  Under your definition I could see calling myself a pet.

(in reply to FemmeOwner)
Profile   Post #: 11
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Submissive >> On being a "pet" Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078