Chaingang
Posts: 1727
Joined: 10/24/2005 Status: offline
|
I'll just quote myself from some old threads: --- "The Corporation" 3 Hrs. THE CORPORATION explores the nature and spectacular rise of the dominant institution of our time. Footage from pop culture, advertising, TV news, and corporate propaganda, illuminates the corporation's grip on our lives. Taking its legal status as a "person" to its logical conclusion, the film puts the corporation on the psychiatrist's couch to ask "What kind of person is it?" Provoking, witty, sweepingly informative, The Corporation includes forty interviews with corporate insiders and critics - including Milton Friedman, Noam Chomsky, Naomi Klein, and Michael Moore - plus true confessions, case studies and strategies for change. http://informationclearinghouse.info/article12998.htm --- "I hope that we shall crush in its birth the aristocracy of our monied corporations, which dare already to challenge our government to a trial of strength, and bid defiance to the laws of our country." -Thomas Jefferson, 1816. --- Corporations have to be kept within the borders of individual countries because otherwise they are potentially supranational and bigger than some countries - look at Walmart and consider the Jefferson quote from earlier: "I hope that we shall crush in its birth the aristocracy of our monied corporations, which dare already to challenge our government to a trial of strength, and bid defiance to the laws of our country." In that "trial of strength" the corporations must lose, otherwise there shall be no real ability to regulate them. It's too easy to hide assets, not pay taxes, etc. by keeping it all offshore. You cannot regulate what is beyond your reach. I don't disagree that it's an undesirable solution because I too have certain capitalist leanings. But it's probably the best and only solution to the problem under discussion. Consider too that part of the problem of things like offshoring is that the corporation does not have a national interest only a profit motive. So these corporate entities that wield so much power within our borders don't ultimately care about the strength of the nations they reside within - they can simply move elsewhere if need be. A nation's interest and that of the corporation must be the same if corporations are to be made to serve a public good as they used to. --- Excellent link here: "How Corporations Became 'Persons'" http://www.uuworld.org/2003/03/feature1a.html other content here: http://www.uuworld.org/2003/03/contents.html --- What people have to understand is the very direct manner which corporations unhampered will lead to plutocratic tyranny. This kind of consolidation of power and money is the death of our democratic republic. And while we don't have to make corporations illegal, we do have to curtail their power severly. Needstouseyou: The difference is one is a tyranny and the other is a democratic process. Did that really have to be explained to you?
_____________________________
"Everything flows, nothing stands still." (Πάντα ῥεῖ καὶ οὐδὲν μένει) - Heraclitus
|