Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

I Like Ike


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> I Like Ike Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
I Like Ike - 12/12/2006 4:11:45 PM   
Chaingang


Posts: 1727
Joined: 10/24/2005
Status: offline
Farewell Address
http://www.eisenhower.archives.gov/farewell.htm

Farewell Radio and Television Address to the American People by President Dwight D. Eisenhower, January 17, 1961.

My fellow Americans:

Three days from now, after half a century in the service of our country, I shall lay down the responsibilities of office as, in traditional and solemn ceremony, the authority of the Presidency is vested in my successor.

This evening I come to you with a message of leave-taking and farewell, and to share a few final thoughts with you, my countrymen.

Like every other citizen, I wish the new President, and all who will labor with him, Godspeed. I pray that the coming years will be blessed with peace and prosperity for all.

Our people expect their President and the Congress to find essential agreement on issues of great moment, the wise resolution of which will better shape the future of the Nation.

My own relations with the Congress, which began on a remote and tenuous basis when, long ago, a member of the Senate appointed me to West Point, have since ranged to the intimate during the war and immediate post-war period, and, finally, to the mutually interdependent during these past eight years.

In this final relationship, the Congress and the Administration have, on most vital issues, cooperated well, to serve the national good rather than mere partisanship, and so have assured that the business of the Nation should go forward. So, my official relationship with the Congress ends in a feeling, on my part, of gratitude that we have been able to do so much together.

II

We now stand ten years past the midpoint of a century that has witnessed four major wars among great nations. Three of these involved our own country. Despite these holocausts America is today the strongest, the most influential and most productive nation in the world. Understandably proud of this pre-eminence, we yet realize that America's leadership and prestige depend, not merely upon our unmatched material progress, riches and military strength, but on how we use our power in the interests of world peace and human betterment.

III

Throughout America's adventure in free government, our basic purposes have been to keep the peace; to foster progress in human achievement, and to enhance liberty, dignity and integrity among people and among nations. To strive for less would be unworthy of a free and religious people. Any failure traceable to arrogance, or our lack of comprehension or readiness to sacrifice would inflict upon us grievous hurt both at home and abroad.

Progress toward these noble goals is persistently threatened by the conflict now engulfing the world. It commands our whole attention, absorbs our very beings. We face a hostile ideology-global in scope, atheistic in character, ruthless in purpose, and insidious in method. Unhappily the danger it poses promises to be of indefinite duration. To meet it successfully, there is called for, not so much the emotional and transitory sacrifices of crisis, but rather those which enable us to carry forward steadily, surely, and without complaint the burdens of a prolonged and complex struggle-with liberty at stake. Only thus shall we remain, despite every provocation, on our charted course toward permanent peace and human betterment.

Crises there will continue to be. In meeting them, whether foreign or domestic, great or small,there is a recurring temptation to feel that some spectacular and costly action could become the miraculous solution to all current difficulties. A huge increase in newer elements of our defense; development of unrealistic programs to cure every ill in agriculture; a dramatic expansion in basic and applied research-these and many other possibilities, each possibly promising in itself, may be suggested as the only way to the road we wish to travel.

But each proposal must be weighed in the light of a broader consideration: the need to maintain balance in and among national programs-balance between the private and the public economy, balance between cost and hoped for advantage-balance between the clearly necessary and the comfortably desirable; balance between our essential requirements as a nation and the duties imposed by the nation upon the individual; balance between action of the moment and the national welfare of the future. Good judgment seeks balance and progress; lack of it eventually finds imbalance and frustration.

The record of many decades stands as proof that our people and their government have, in the main, understood these truths and have responded to them well, in the face of stress and threat. But threats, new in kind or degree, constantly arise. I mention two only.

IV

A vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment. Our arms must be mighty, ready for instant action, so that no potential aggressor may be tempted to risk his own destruction.

Our military organization today bears little relation to that known by any of my predecessors in peace time, or indeed by the fighting men of World War II or Korea.

Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United States corporations.

This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence-economic, political, even spiritual-is felt in every city, every state house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.

In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.

We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.

Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution during recent decades.

In this revolution, research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.

Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been over shadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers.

The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded.

Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.

It is the task of statesmanship to mold, to balance, and to integrate these and other forces, new and old, within the principles of our democratic system-ever aiming toward the supreme goals of our free society.

V

Another factor in maintaining balance involves the element of time. As we peer into society's future, we-you and I, and our government-must avoid the impulse to live only for today, plundering, for our own ease and convenience, the precious resources of tomorrow. We cannot mortgage the material assets of our grandchildren without risking the loss also of their political and spiritual heritage. We want democracy to survive for all generations to come, not to become the insolvent phantom of tomorrow.

VI

Down the long lane of the history yet to be written America knows that this world of ours, ever growing smaller, must avoid becoming a community of dreadful fear and hate, and be, instead, a proud confederation of mutual trust and respect.

Such a confederation must be one of equals. The weakest must come to the conference table with the same confidence as do we, protected as we are by our moral, economic, and military strength. That table, though scarred by many past frustrations, cannot be abandoned for the certain agony of the battlefield.

Disarmament, with mutual honor and confidence, is a continuing imperative. Together we must learn how to compose difference, not with arms, but with intellect and decent purpose. Because this need is so sharp and apparent I confess that I lay down my official responsibilities in this field with a definite sense of disappointment. As one who has witnessed the horror and the lingering sadness of war-as one who knows that another war could utterly destroy this civilization which has been so slowly and painfully built over thousands of years-I wish I could say tonight that a lasting peace is in sight.

Happily, I can say that war has been avoided. Steady progress toward our ultimate goal has been made. But, so much remains to be done. As a private citizen, I shall never cease to do what little I can to help the world advance along that road.

VII

So-in this my last good night to you as your President-I thank you for the many opportunities you have given me for public service in war and peace. I trust that in that service you find somethings worthy; as for the rest of it, I know you will find ways to improve performance in the future.

You and I-my fellow citizens-need to be strong in our faith that all nations, under God, will reach the goal of peace with justice. May we be ever unswerving in devotion to principle, confident but humble with power, diligent in pursuit of the Nation's great goals.

To all the peoples of the world, I once more give expression to America's prayerful and continuing aspiration:

We pray that peoples of all faiths, all races, all nations, may have their great human needs satisfied; that those now denied opportunity shall come to enjoy it to the full; that all who yearn for freedom may experience its spiritual blessings; that those who have freedom will understand, also, its heavy responsibilities; that all who are insensitive to the needs of others will learn charity; that the scourges of poverty, disease and ignorance will be made to disappear from the earth, and that, in the goodness of time, all peoples will come to live together in a peace guaranteed by the binding force of mutual respect and love.

---

Well, I like this speech anyway.

_____________________________

"Everything flows, nothing stands still." (Πάντα ῥεῖ καὶ οὐδὲν μένει) - Heraclitus
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: I Like Ike - 12/12/2006 7:40:46 PM   
UtopianRanger


Posts: 3251
Status: offline
A true statesman and hands down my favorite president of the millennium. I have his ominous farewell speech recorded on DVD and watch it every so often. .... You can rent the DVD '' Why we fight'' at your local Blockbuster and see Ike make this speech.





- R


_____________________________

"If you are going to win any battle, you have to do one thing. You have to make the mind run the body. Never let the body tell the mind what to do... the body is never tired if the mind is not tired."

-General George S. Patton


(in reply to Chaingang)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: I Like Ike - 12/12/2006 10:41:58 PM   
MasterKalif


Posts: 648
Joined: 5/24/2004
Status: offline
nice speech....so unlike politicians today. However I prefer the more fun speeches of General Pinochet, for those that know Spanish they can look it up on youtube, lol.

(in reply to UtopianRanger)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: I Like Ike - 12/13/2006 2:21:41 AM   
Chaingang


Posts: 1727
Joined: 10/24/2005
Status: offline
Pinochet era un hijo de puta.

_____________________________

"Everything flows, nothing stands still." (Πάντα ῥεῖ καὶ οὐδὲν μένει) - Heraclitus

(in reply to MasterKalif)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: I Like Ike - 12/13/2006 2:32:28 AM   
seeksfemslave


Posts: 4011
Joined: 6/16/2006
Status: offline
Hijo de Puta....such a nasty expression ! Far worse than the "N" word in my opinion.
Haven't plowed thru Ike's speech but I do rememeber him condemning the US  "Military Industrial" complex and its motivations.
Noone with influence took any notice tho' did they, the hijos de putas.   lol

I rather liked Truman, I liked his blunt speaking whether or not I agreed with what was being said. His political background was mor than dodgy though. He was part of what was called the Prendergast machine who amongst other things carved up the highway construction projects in Missouri.

< Message edited by seeksfemslave -- 12/13/2006 2:37:57 AM >

(in reply to Chaingang)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: I Like Ike - 12/13/2006 2:49:00 AM   
UtopianRanger


Posts: 3251
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaingang

Pinochet era un hijo de puta.


That was funny, Chaingang



- R


_____________________________

"If you are going to win any battle, you have to do one thing. You have to make the mind run the body. Never let the body tell the mind what to do... the body is never tired if the mind is not tired."

-General George S. Patton


(in reply to Chaingang)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: I Like Ike - 12/13/2006 3:55:11 AM   
Voltare


Posts: 841
Joined: 1/1/2004
From: Santiago, Chile
Status: offline
a la MIERDA, verdad!

Living in Santiago, I've been avoiding downtown.  I don't believe in hell, but I'm sure there's a special place in it for him anyway.

_____________________________

http://www.vv3b.com/

"There is always some madness in love, but there is always some reason in madness." - F. Nietzsche

(in reply to UtopianRanger)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: I Like Ike - 12/13/2006 7:58:18 AM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline
Eisenhower was a good President. I liked his speeches and his speaking style. Always seemed to be "no nonsense"
None of that "building bridges to the 21st century" crap that Clinton always indulged in.
Even on a rhetorical level that sounds rediculous.
Has anyone seen one of Clinton's "bridges?"

(in reply to Chaingang)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: I Like Ike - 12/13/2006 8:03:11 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
by the military-industrial complex.

He coined the phrase and unfortunately no one took his advice against it to heart.

America---Doomed to repeating history since 1776.

Ron

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: I Like Ike - 12/13/2006 9:30:11 AM   
Chaingang


Posts: 1727
Joined: 10/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: UtopianRanger
That was funny, Chaingang


I guess the main problem there is that we are mainly attacking his mother, just like the english expression.

My mom once called me a "son of a bitch" and I immediately retorted that she would know.

Grounded!


_____________________________

"Everything flows, nothing stands still." (Πάντα ῥεῖ καὶ οὐδὲν μένει) - Heraclitus

(in reply to UtopianRanger)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: I Like Ike - 12/13/2006 12:01:14 PM   
UtopianRanger


Posts: 3251
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

Eisenhower was a good President. I liked his speeches and his speaking style. Always seemed to be "no nonsense"
None of that "building bridges to the 21st century" crap that Clinton always indulged in.
Even on a rhetorical level that sounds rediculous.
Has anyone seen one of Clinton's "bridges?"



Popeye....

Perhaps the greatest thing about Ike in my opinion was that he looked and acted like I've always envisioned American president should. He held the office with great dignity and was very serious, always speaking in his ''matter of fact'' style. It's very ''Americana'' and I just like that.


 
- R


_____________________________

"If you are going to win any battle, you have to do one thing. You have to make the mind run the body. Never let the body tell the mind what to do... the body is never tired if the mind is not tired."

-General George S. Patton


(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: I Like Ike - 12/13/2006 3:20:36 PM   
MasterKalif


Posts: 648
Joined: 5/24/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaingang

Pinochet era un hijo de puta.


jajajaja bueno esa es una opinion muy personal.....LOL

(in reply to Chaingang)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: I Like Ike - 12/13/2006 4:33:42 PM   
Chaingang


Posts: 1727
Joined: 10/24/2005
Status: offline
Si fueras uno de los desaparecidos, sera muy personal a ti tambien, no?

_____________________________

"Everything flows, nothing stands still." (Πάντα ῥεῖ καὶ οὐδὲν μένει) - Heraclitus

(in reply to MasterKalif)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: I Like Ike - 12/13/2006 5:08:32 PM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline
I like Turman for 2 reasons.
   1    right or wrong he personally made the decision to drop the A-bomb on Japan
   2    He didn't take any crap from McArthur.  MacArthur was a good general but he still had superiors and was obliged to obey them and keep his mouth shut.

I liked Ike because he was decisive and direct.

I liked Kennedy because of his policies.   He told the Americans to help themselves and not rely upon the government to take care of them and didn't take Russia's crap.

I disliked Johnson, Nixon and Carter.   They were pretty much do nothings except mis mannage the country.

I liked Regan because he stood up to the soviets without giving in which I believe caused them to fall.

I don't care one way or the other for either bush or clinton. 

(in reply to Chaingang)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: I Like Ike - 12/14/2006 2:28:41 AM   
seeksfemslave


Posts: 4011
Joined: 6/16/2006
Status: offline
KenDckey said about Truman
He didn't take any crap from McArthur.  MacArthur was a good general but he still had superiors and was obliged to obey them and keep his mouth shut.

Excellent point KD.
McArthur was a bit of a show boating megalomaniac .....in my opinion.

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: I Like Ike - 12/14/2006 11:45:57 AM   
MasterKalif


Posts: 648
Joined: 5/24/2004
Status: offline
Chaingang, acaso lo es para ti? De donde te nace tanto odio contra una persona?

(in reply to Chaingang)
Profile   Post #: 16
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> I Like Ike Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094