subnstudent -> RE: Uncollared vs. Self-collared. (12/25/2006 2:28:06 PM)
|
I'm going to stand by my previous statement and say a symbol is just a symbol. In the case of any locking/screw-on/etc collars, they're made to be hard to remove. If both parties want that, then more power to them. If a person didn't want to wear one all the time, I should hope the Master in this relationship would understand, and choose something more suitable or come to an agreement about wearing it. If he wasn't amenable to this idea, then there might be communication issues between them. I say, "It's just a collar." Sure, it might be a symbol of ownership and commitment, but those can exist without a symbol. Likewise, the collar can exist without a meaning behind it. It's just what works for every individual person, and frankly if people disagree to the point where they start flaming one another, I'd think that they weren't going to get involved with one another so there's no point to bickering about it. If you're going to say, "I don't understand why," then pay attention to the posts that actually say something. If you just disagree, go ahead. Your opinion is duly noted and life will go on. That's it.
|
|
|
|