Mercnbeth
Posts: 11766
Status: offline
|
quote:
The first part that struck me was "the shortage of men willing and able to step up to the plate and be the dominant one in the house. Too many wanting the good stuff and not willing to work at doing the tough stuff. " What is the tough stuff? Accepting responsibility and being responsible, having and maintaining integrity in the face of an easier option, giving and demanding respect; all not "tough" but missing in a world were considering the feelings and perspective of others supersedes truth or even law. Pragmatic application of consequence for actions both good and bad seems to also be in short supply. The goal is not to be firm but to compromise to avoid conflict. Maintain the quiet at all cost until it does become "tough". Than its a self fulfilling prophecy, "tough" to stay - its easy to leave. The fact that it may be more prevalent in this lifestyle is a function of the lifestyle itself. The blossoming of access to BDSM, D/s, and all it encompasses didn't create a blossoming of dominant men anymore than it created more submissive woman. This is just another venue to try to find somebody, anybody, to 'hook up'. For men, superficial as they are, they view this as an opportunity. Submissive woman! "Wow - get on your knees bitch!" Making it past lifestyle adolescence they may hold off on that thought until the second date, but there is no natural dominant nature. The act can last for a time. However acting is 'work', it gets tiring, it gets old, it gets tough. So you see the; "Why isn't my Dom/Master like he was when we met?" or "How do I manipulate my Dom/Master to discipline me like he used to?" Why? How? The answer is the same - he or she is no longer acting, he/she no longer wants to. There is an aversion toward using the words "true" or "real" to as an adjective in front of the labels Dom/Master/sub/slave. Most times the adamant position of being true or real is inversely proportion to their real and true nature. However when contemplating a relationship is should be a requirement that you are representing and seeing a "true", "real" person. All it takes is time to make sure the you've seen the 'act' and are now seeing the person. There is no "shortage of men", or woman for that matter, that would meet the standard, but their availability is limited. They are confident with themselves. They usually have very specific and detailed requirements of who they consider for a relationship. They rarely compromise, and are usually intolerant of behavior contrary to representation. If you seek a dominant personality, you'll know you've found one when they don't put up with 'testing' or 'bratty-ness'. They'll pass the 'test' and most likely pass on you. Sure they'll listen to you but maybe it will be more than you want them to. They'll hold you to what you say, but more importantly they'll only trust it if it is also what you do. Do women want that? Are they willing to invest the time to wait for it? I don't think it is a question of not knowing what they want. Rather, I believe, most settle. It results in getting something they know they don't want but tides them over, or serves a current purpose, or achieves a short term monetary or social goal. They buy the act, and most of the time know its an act, because men are just not that good at acting. The attitude is really not gender specific. It's just that woman are more likely to whine about it.
|