LordIncantatore -> RE: Confused for the first time in my life. (12/28/2006 9:06:39 PM)
|
Ok well I am glad I asked this here, I would have to say that yes "open relationship" is the best way to describe what I am looking for. As far as it being confusing, don't I know it, it has taken me three years to figure out as much as I have. No I would not agree with the cake and eat it too analogy, as not only am I so not a player, I actually care for those that I am with. Yes, I do want to have fun, but I define "casual" as one night stand I guess which is why I do not like using that label. As far as the collaring or ownership, I dont have a problem with that because I know it is important to feel like they "belong" and it is my belief that it is a Dom's duty to satisfy the needs of a sub to the best of his ability. And aparently I didnt make something clear, I am not looking for, wanting, probably not even capable of a long-term relationship, a poly relationship. And I dont think it is rude or see a problem with talking to more than one of them right now, At the juncture that we are at, we are just talking. They nor I have agreed to anything at this point. I dont honestly believe that their jealousy is appropriate at this time, I WOULD understand it if we had made commitments and I was trying to change things. To me saying talking to more than one is wrong is like saying talking to more than one friend at a time. As far as emotional support, one of the first things I try to make clear that first and foremost we need to be friends and I will be there for them in anyway that I can. And actually the subject of allowing them to play with another man is concerned, that very subject. One lady that I am talking to lives 1200+ miles away and we have discussed that because I know she will have more "physical" needs than I can reasonably accomodate that yes, arrangements of some sort would need to be made. Please dont get me wrong, I thank all of you for your time and your opinions and you have already given me alot to think about. Maybe what I have envisioned is indeed not attainable.
|
|
|
|