LuckyAlbatross -> RE: Too early to communicate? (12/30/2006 11:23:11 AM)
|
It's a social dance really. We don't want to be the desprate or overflowing types who go through a litany of needs before you get to the 'lo" of "Hello," but we don't want to get ourselves deep into a situation and realize there's some glaring issue (he wants kids, you don't) that got overlooked. I'd say, before you make a non-play date, you should have talked about general perspectives and place in life- age, profession, kids/nokids, married, poly, the "Big Basics." And if it takes one or two dates before all that comes out, that's ok too. Going on general "Hey, he's kinda hot and we might have a spark" is more than enough reason to try for a first date. I think any more than three dates without going over the Big Basics however, you'll be getting into overkill and dangerous waters. That's what dating IS- it's testing the waters to start and see what might be there. I think too many put too much pressure on first dates. And you might decide after Date One that it's just not right for you, or Date Two, or Date Three- I think if you genuinely are interested in them and they aren't glaringly disrespecting you, that giving them three dates with you isn't that much of a sacrifice to make sure where you want to go next, and that if after Date One you think that's it, then that's fine too. Once that ground is covered however, it's all about mining on the specifics. And there's simply no way to track what should be revealed then since once you get beyond the basics- we're all too individualized and quirky to predict what's going to be an "issue" and what won't.
|
|
|
|