LadyHugs -> RE: Ladies? Are some of us just too damn picky? (1/3/2007 9:16:45 PM)
|
Dear slavebrandyj, I read your post and have made a comment in regard to Dr. Phil--to which nothing Dr. Phil was said or mentioned in my two prior postings. However, I do want to address the more personal side of your post. In summary, you said that the Lady dominant in this newly ended relationship saw the 80% in you of what she had sought. The workable 20% in your mind's eyes was 'workable.' What needs to be said, that D/s and or M/s is consensual on both sides of the whip. Each person in the relationship sees things differently and have selective hearing at times. At times people 'want' so much in a desperate way to love and or be loved; that love is projected in a skewed manner and is based on perception and or assumption; rather than on the romantic side and or the fond and or affection side. In my mind's eyes the word "love" means so many things in so many contexts that its a word to avoid and use other words to more accurately measure where the 'spirit of intent' in the use of 'love' comes from. For example; I do love people. I love them dearly indeed and I am affectionate. However, that does not mean that I am ready to hop into a relationship. But, the sad part in seeking a partner; sometimes or wants do not match with the needs. Needs are something that is the measure of which the 80% of a person's match should focus. People need security, loyalty, faithfulness and things of that nature. A want, would be more like a short man/tall man, etc., person who doesn't smoke, etc. In addition, people stripped of the trappings of their titles, their work lables or job titles, the tainted glasses made from fantasy, desire, lust, envy, sexual draw and the temptation to remold and or change a person entirely is folly. Pushing a person despite the past pleasures and words of affection and such, changing them is not the answer. Isn't it best now to find out that the split is ugly and manifests the ugly under the trappings of beauty. In my mind's eyes, I find some are people pleasers and do try their hardest to please the potential partner but, as it happens the closer to commitment and or, the point of no return--morals, ethics and self identity looms large before them. Truth is at their feet and a choice must be made. Be honest to self and stop the progress that is moving into the direction of living a lie or, to continue the lie as not to hurt you but resent the fact that they felt obligated out of guilt, out of people pleasing despite their internal ethics and morals shouting no, being miserable and sick within. Each person, regardless of their roles in the relationship, be it Dominant or submissive; must and I repeat MUST; be able to halt any movement into disaster at any point prior to making a fateful choice. When they say NO--it means No. Both parties must cease and let the issue rest. Both parties need to allow the other space to reflect. But, one thing that is so hard to do--is safe another when they aren't willing to be saved. But, one must allow another to make mistakes and learn from them. The bravest thing of all, is to end the relationship with the same respect and dignity as it began. I've been blessed with relationships ending with respect and dignity. Indeed it hurts emotionally, mentally and physically--but, when ending on a good note; we still have our communication as friends, even though not as D/s and or M/s. It is taking that higher ground that allows another to 'save face.' Even when wronged; taking the higher level of dignity and respect will be rewarded. One can look into the mirror and know they did their best and sleep well knowing such. Perhaps a better person will come and be even more rich in the qualities you seek. Just some thoughts. Respectfully submitted for consideration, Lady Hugs
|
|
|
|