LeatherBentOne
Posts: 469
Joined: 9/27/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: kyraofMists How have/would you handle a situation when the top and bottom’s desire for aftercare are in direct conflict with each other? The difference in desire is not necessarily that one wants it and the other doesn’t but that they each want a different type or style of aftercare. What if the conflicting desires are discovered after the play, not because of poor communication but because the play itself changed what was wanted? Usually, my Lord and I are rather in sync with the type of aftercare that we want. Our last play, we were not. The play put me in an extremely negative headspace and I came out of it just wanting to be isolated and not touched (difficult to achieve in a noisy, crowded play party). He wanted to be touched and to hold me. We dealt with it by giving each other a little of what was wanted until we were back in sync. Knight's kyra Perhaps he gave you what he thought you needed, not necessarily wanted at that time. Maybe he did what he thought would be best for you under the circumstances. To my way of thinking, if this were the case, you're very fortunate to have such a sensitive and caring Lord. I'd guess that once a couple got to a certain level of familiarity in play, that they may become more spontaneous in all areas of play, including aftercare, specifically because no two scenes are exactly the same, nor do they evoke the same responses. This would tend to be the same concept for both involved. For me, spontaneity is a major turn on, so once limits are set and initial negotiation for the introduction to each toy I use is completed while we are still new to each other, most of my scenes are very spontaneous from that time onward, including aftercare depending on my sub's needs. However, my wants always come after her welfare. LBO
|