|
Squeakers -> RE: What's the attraction to toilet training? (1/20/2007 2:00:58 AM)
|
Giving this whole thing a little thought, I simply can not regard toliet service as anymore unhealthly than unprotected sex with an unknown partner. For me, I'd be more apt to consider being a toliet slave to someone I know extreemely well rather than pick some random guy up and bring him home for unprotected sex. I'll have to say without a doubt if one were to take a poll, I am sure most would pick the unprotected sex as being less dangerous than consuming waste, Further, in regards to the more devious people, I think many would find golden more to their liking than brown.
I think there is a sort of unspoken 'fear' or 'intimidation' regarding the whole anal thing. There are those who will use a public restroom to urinate but never deficate in one. I know many vanilla people who would never consider anal sex. Sodomy consensual or not has been known to be illegal in some states in the US but I am not sure if it still exsist on the books in any states at this time and if it does, is it ever enforced in a consensual sense. And of course we sometimes hear that someone was arrested for rape and sodomy, and regardless if forced penetration is anal, oral or vaginally, to me it's still rape. Pehaps, it's considered such a negative because we get so many of our laws and morals from the bible. Darn that Sodom anyways.
I think each person participates in activities which others will find distasteful. A submissive simply into D/s may find my S/M activities purely distateful if not painful and scary. For me S/M with my partner is sensual and loving. Some may find that my description of S/M a bit off the wall. Would I feel it to be sensual and loving with another partner? Probably no.
Back to the toliet service, and just for the record, I am not a toliet slave, but why would it be any different than oral sex, unless one spits?
|
|
|
|
