Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Threat to world peace???????


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Threat to world peace??????? Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Threat to world peace??????? - 1/17/2007 2:44:56 PM   
WyrdRich


Posts: 1733
Joined: 1/3/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: missturbation

Ok so presuming you are correct (and you are not) that the USA was a part of the war before pearl harbour would you care to prove you were dragged into it or are you back peddling on that one?

Edited to add germany and italy declared war on you three days after pearl harbour. The USA appears to have taken on what they thought were the little guys Germany and italy and then very bravely killed an estimated 140,000 people on august the 6th 1945 in a nuke attack on Japan. 



      Actually, that is the estimated total of two separate attacks.  The highest single event of civilian deaths was the joint US- British firebombing of Dresden.

(in reply to missturbation)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Threat to world peace??????? - 1/17/2007 2:47:45 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: missturbation

So proud lol. The USA only became involved in world war two when it became in their interest. When we requested help you turned us down other than supply aid which we paid for. Pity Tony Blair didnt tell George Bush to go stick it when you asked us for help.


Of course it was in our interest.  No nation does anything that's not "in their interest".  Neither do people.  What's the point?

As far as Lend Lease and your payments that were completed recently, correct? It was even posted here.

Some things you might have missed in the quoted article:

"In a nutshell, everything we got from America in World War II was free," says economic historian Professor Mark Harrison, of Warwick University.

...

Under the programme, the US had effectively donated equipment for the war effort, but anything left over in Britain at the end of hostilities and still needed would have to be paid for.

But the price would please a bargain hunter - the US only wanted one-tenth of the production cost of the equipment and would lend the money to pay for it.

...

And while the UK dutifully pays off its World War II debts, those from World War I remain resolutely unpaid. And are by no means trifling.


As far as providing "only what you could pay for", I beg to differ.  Ever heard the saying "Oversexed, overpaid and over here."?

I value the lives our my countrymen more than any equipment or money we may have loaned you.

quote:

ORIGINAL: missturbation

Edited to add - How did you win that war? You resorted to nuclear war fare on hiroshima and nagasaki. An estimated 140,000 people were killed in those bombings. Big pat on the back for you.


So?

I'd trade 140,000 citizens of any country before I would allow the sacrifice of an estimated million US casualities.

I've heard that patriotism is dead in the UK, so perhaps you wouldn't mind letting a million of your countrymen die, so that you can maintain some vague moral high ground.

*shrugs*

Just call me a Neanderthal.  I'd prefer to keep my countrymen alive first.

FirmKY


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to missturbation)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Threat to world peace??????? - 1/17/2007 2:48:47 PM   
missturbation


Posts: 8290
Joined: 2/12/2006
From: another planet
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: WyrdRich

quote:

ORIGINAL: missturbation

Ok so presuming you are correct (and you are not) that the USA was a part of the war before pearl harbour would you care to prove you were dragged into it or are you back peddling on that one?

Edited to add germany and italy declared war on you three days after pearl harbour. The USA appears to have taken on what they thought were the little guys Germany and italy and then very bravely killed an estimated 140,000 people on august the 6th 1945 in a nuke attack on Japan. 



    Actually, that is the estimated total of two separate attacks.  The highest single event of civilian deaths was the joint US- British firebombing of Dresden.


Hiroshima and nagasaki were towns full of innocent people. They still suffer after effects to this day.
You did not win that war by the means you stated you won that war by nuclear bombing towns / cities as i stated.
Edited to add yes 80,000 at hiroshima and 60,000 at nagasaki but that isnt really the point is it?
 
 

< Message edited by missturbation -- 1/17/2007 2:51:09 PM >


_____________________________

What you don't witness with your eyes, don't witness with your mouth. Proverb.

If it fit's in a toaster, i can cook it.

Buying 10 item's or less is not shopping !!

(in reply to WyrdRich)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Threat to world peace??????? - 1/17/2007 2:59:09 PM   
seeksfemslave


Posts: 4011
Joined: 6/16/2006
Status: offline
The same old anti American feelings manifest over their contribution to WW2 and how it, the contribution, came about.

Tho' Adolf did declare War on the USA. surely in the light of events at the time that was not much more than a gesture ? The US could quite easily , in my opinion, have told Europe to go and eff itself, wait until Germany defeated the Soviet Union and   concentrate on the enemy in the East. ie Japan. Had they not have had a Jewish President, that is almost certainly what would have happened.  In my opinion.

If the US is as Imperialist as many appear to believe why, wonder of wonders, did they not retain control of Japan ?

To balance things up I do think the US were the aggressors in the Cold War. US v USSR. tho' even there, as posted before, Eisenhower gave a clear warning of why that was so.

The major criticism that can be levelled at the US in my opinion is the lack of compassion to the GENUINELY socially needy, and I'm a hard line Right Winger, and the fact that they keep electing crappy actors to high office.

< Message edited by seeksfemslave -- 1/17/2007 3:04:28 PM >

(in reply to WyrdRich)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Threat to world peace??????? - 1/17/2007 3:01:23 PM   
missturbation


Posts: 8290
Joined: 2/12/2006
From: another planet
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: missturbation

So proud lol. The USA only became involved in world war two when it became in their interest. When we requested help you turned us down other than supply aid which we paid for. Pity Tony Blair didnt tell George Bush to go stick it when you asked us for help.


Of course it was in our interest.  No nation does anything that's not "in their interest".  Neither do people.  What's the point?
I have done things not in my own interest to help others.

As far as Lend Lease and your payments that were completed recently, correct? It was even posted here.
Yes we've paid you back.

Some things you might have missed in the quoted article:



"In a nutshell, everything we got from America in World War II was free," says economic historian Professor Mark Harrison, of Warwick University.
Hmm and yet we have only just finished paying you back.

...

Under the programme, the US had effectively donated equipment for the war effort, but anything left over in Britain at the end of hostilities and still needed would have to be paid for.

You didnt donate you lent.

But the price would please a bargain hunter - the US only wanted one-tenth of the production cost of the equipment and would lend the money to pay for it.

...

And while the UK dutifully pays off its World War II debts, those from World War I remain resolutely unpaid. And are by no means trifling.

Good we owe you nothing in the way of debts for war.


As far as providing "only what you could pay for", I beg to differ.  Ever heard the saying "Oversexed, overpaid and over here."?

I value the lives our my countrymen more than any equipment or money we may have loaned you.
i personally value all human life whether they be american, japanese or British etc. I personally find a nuclear attack cowardly.

quote:

ORIGINAL: missturbation

Edited to add - How did you win that war? You resorted to nuclear war fare on hiroshima and nagasaki. An estimated 140,000 people were killed in those bombings. Big pat on the back for you.


So?

I'd trade 140,000 citizens of any country before I would allow the sacrifice of an estimated million US casualities.
I wouldnt - innocent lives and all that.

I've heard that patriotism is dead in the UK, so perhaps you wouldn't mind letting a million of your countrymen die, so that you can maintain some vague moral high ground.
I personally would rather noone died. I am surprised to find you defend a country which recently has gone into war for the glory of controlling oil. Now yes i can see where your interests lie there.

*shrugs*

Just call me a Neanderthal.  I'd prefer to keep my countrymen alive first.

FirmKY



Ok lol but when are you going to answer and not avoid my question?
How were you dragged into the war and care to prove it?
How do you feel about the fact that people still suffer from the effects of hiroshima and nagasaki?
War is horrid and all lives lost are terrible but to bomb two towns / cities with 140,000 killed, women, men and children is abysmal.
So by your attitude when George Bush asked for Britians help in Iraq we should have said Get lost as you did to us in world war two.

_____________________________

What you don't witness with your eyes, don't witness with your mouth. Proverb.

If it fit's in a toaster, i can cook it.

Buying 10 item's or less is not shopping !!

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Threat to world peace??????? - 1/17/2007 3:05:05 PM   
Sinergy


Posts: 9383
Joined: 4/26/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: seeksfemslave

If the US is as Imperialist as many appear to believe why, wonder of wonders, did they not retain control of Japan ?



Lets see.

We forced Japan to sign a constitution of our choosing.  In that constitution we stated that Japan could not develop their military any more than 10% of their gross national product.  In exchange, the US agreed to cover Japan under the umbrella of the US' military.

Then we retooled their industries, loaned them money, and told them what they could do with themselves on the world stage.

How exactly do you define "giving up control of Japan."

Sinergy

p.s. Although an argument could be made that Japan refused to relinquish control of the United States after they lost the war.

_____________________________

"There is a fine line between clever and stupid"
David St. Hubbins "This Is Spinal Tap"

"Every so often you let a word or phrase out and you want to catch it and bring it back. You cant do that, it is gone, gone forever." J. Danforth Quayle


(in reply to seeksfemslave)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Threat to world peace??????? - 1/17/2007 3:07:51 PM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

I'd trade 140,000 citizens of any country before I would allow the sacrifice of an estimated million US casualities.

I've heard that patriotism is dead in the UK, so perhaps you wouldn't mind letting a million of your countrymen die, so that you can maintain some vague moral high ground.

Just call me a Neanderthal.  I'd prefer to keep my countrymen alive first.



Well it appears you have Neanderthals in power at the moment. I was just watching Newsnight on BBC and in 2003 Iran offered the US everything that the US is asking of them now in exchange for the US not sheltering what Iran considered a terrorist group in Iraq, Cheney refused. There was an inteview with a Colin Powel aid who said the Vice president's office rejected all overtures from Iran, something he believes (and by inference Colin Powel) to be inept leadership and something the US will regret.

_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Threat to world peace??????? - 1/17/2007 3:08:00 PM   
missturbation


Posts: 8290
Joined: 2/12/2006
From: another planet
Status: offline
The same old anti American feelings manifest over their contribution to WW2 and how it, the contribution, came about

Actually no. How america came into the war was only raised due to one persons claim they were dragged into it. I personally dont care they took no part in it until they had to.


_____________________________

What you don't witness with your eyes, don't witness with your mouth. Proverb.

If it fit's in a toaster, i can cook it.

Buying 10 item's or less is not shopping !!

(in reply to seeksfemslave)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Threat to world peace??????? - 1/17/2007 3:14:50 PM   
seeksfemslave


Posts: 4011
Joined: 6/16/2006
Status: offline
Missturbation, I love you madly, but you are  allowing your emotions to lead you astray. If at the time  the US had got itself into position to launch a ground strike on Japan, your decision, and you saw estimates of the likely casulties to your own troops, and an alternative  ie Nuclear Weapons existed....what would you do ?

Incidently, to get close enough to Japan had cost enormous loss of life, fighting for the islands in the Pacific.

(in reply to missturbation)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Threat to world peace??????? - 1/17/2007 3:15:02 PM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: seeksfemslave

Tho' Adolf did declare War on the USA. surely in the light of events at the time that was not much more than a gesture ? The US could quite easily , in my opinion, have told Europe to go and eff itself, wait until Germany defeated the Soviet Union and   concentrate on the enemy in the East. ie Japan. Had they not have had a Jewish President, that is almost certainly what would have happened.  In my opinion.



Germany could never have won the war though it probably seemed like they could at the time. As for Japan, it banned its fishing fleet from fishing because it was so short of fuel and that was before Pearl Harbour.

As for the US not being in control of Europe, which country do you live in? I've no idea what hold America has over Britain but Britain puts the US's interests before its own. Maybe it is just psychological, I don't know, I wish I had the answer but whatever it is Britain is the 51st state and its rather humiliating but then, many Dutch feel the same way about Holland. Germany feel an inability to act because of their history so that leaves France, which is the only country willing to steer its own course.

_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to seeksfemslave)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Threat to world peace??????? - 1/17/2007 3:19:32 PM   
seeksfemslave


Posts: 4011
Joined: 6/16/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy

quote:

ORIGINAL: seeksfemslave

If the US is as Imperialist as many appear to believe why, wonder of wonders, did they not retain control of Japan ?



Lets see.

We forced Japan to sign a constitution of our choosing.  In that constitution we stated that Japan could not develop their military any more than 10% of their gross national product.  In exchange, the US agreed to cover Japan under the umbrella of the US' military.

Then we retooled their industries, loaned them money, and told them what they could do with themselves on the world stage.

****How exactly do you define "giving up control of Japan.***

Sinergy

p.s. Although an argument could be made that Japan refused to relinquish control of the United States after they lost the war.


Apart from the bit in stars I cant figure out whether you agree with me or not. 

(in reply to Sinergy)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Threat to world peace??????? - 1/17/2007 3:20:17 PM   
MzMia


Posts: 5333
Joined: 7/30/2004
Status: offline
Hell, great thread...I am reading the comments right now.
Nice to see the ladies starting political threads, some of us enjoy chatting
about OTHER things besides "relationships" "men" and "why the fuck
he did not call!"
I am not sure if Bush should be tried, but maybe he could just resign?
ha


_____________________________

Namaste'
To Each His/Her Own
"DENIAL ain't just a river in Egypt." Mark Twain


What's your favorite fetish?
"My partner's whisper"--bloomswell

(in reply to missturbation)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Threat to world peace??????? - 1/17/2007 3:20:44 PM   
Sinergy


Posts: 9383
Joined: 4/26/2004
Status: offline
 
So I am driving through Bueltton and I come to a stop light blocked by SWAT teams and the bomb squad.

Apparently, an organization of Kali worshippers had hijacked a Cessna and were aiming it at the local Pea Soup Andersons in order to bring about the end of...  Oh, this thread is not about threats to whirled peas.

Move along, nothing to see here.

Sinergy

_____________________________

"There is a fine line between clever and stupid"
David St. Hubbins "This Is Spinal Tap"

"Every so often you let a word or phrase out and you want to catch it and bring it back. You cant do that, it is gone, gone forever." J. Danforth Quayle


(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Threat to world peace??????? - 1/17/2007 3:24:04 PM   
seeksfemslave


Posts: 4011
Joined: 6/16/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL meatcleaver
I've no idea what hold America has over Britain but Britain puts the US's interests before its own. Maybe it is just psychological,....


This point has come up before and I believe it is the only way our politicians can assume a role on the World stage.

Humiliating it certainly is !!!!

(in reply to seeksfemslave)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Threat to world peace??????? - 1/17/2007 3:28:29 PM   
missturbation


Posts: 8290
Joined: 2/12/2006
From: another planet
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: seeksfemslave

Missturbation, I love you madly, but you are  allowing your emotions to lead you astray. If at the time  the US had got itself into position to launch a ground strike on Japan, your decision, and you saw estimates of the likely casulties to your own troops, and an alternative  ie Nuclear Weapons existed....what would you do ?

Incidently, to get close enough to Japan had cost enormous loss of life, fighting for the islands in the Pacific.


Whilst i understand that more lives may have been lost in a ground battle i still stand by that the effects of hiroshima and nagasaki are still around today. From what i understand both hiroshima and nagasaki are still radio active and the estimate given is approx 5000 years for radio active contamination to dissipate. According to a website there are 330,000 people in japan still suffering side effects of the bombs.How many lives will be effected in the long run, possibly as many or more as a ground troop war may have affected?
 
Edited to add - The bombings wiped most of the hospitals out and even those that were functional would have been no use as the emp would have knocked anything electric out. People died of very minor injusries due to being unable to get any medical help.

www.gmu.edu/academic/pcs/hiacka.htm

have a look there at the after effects of nuclear attacks on hiroshima.

 

< Message edited by missturbation -- 1/17/2007 3:39:25 PM >


_____________________________

What you don't witness with your eyes, don't witness with your mouth. Proverb.

If it fit's in a toaster, i can cook it.

Buying 10 item's or less is not shopping !!

(in reply to seeksfemslave)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Threat to world peace??????? - 1/17/2007 3:31:11 PM   
missturbation


Posts: 8290
Joined: 2/12/2006
From: another planet
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MzMia

Hell, great thread...I am reading the comments right now.
Nice to see the ladies starting political threads, some of us enjoy chatting
about OTHER things besides "relationships" "men" and "why the fuck
he did not call!"
I am not sure if Bush should be tried, but maybe he could just resign?
ha



well my politics arent good but i decided to get in on the men retiring to the drawing room with their whisky and cigars and trying to convince themselves they are masters of the universe.

< Message edited by missturbation -- 1/17/2007 3:34:30 PM >


_____________________________

What you don't witness with your eyes, don't witness with your mouth. Proverb.

If it fit's in a toaster, i can cook it.

Buying 10 item's or less is not shopping !!

(in reply to MzMia)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Threat to world peace??????? - 1/17/2007 3:46:01 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: missturbation

Ok so presuming you are correct (and you are not) that the USA was a part of the war before pearl harbour would you care to prove you were dragged into it or are you back peddling on that one?

Edited to add germany and italy declared war on you three days after pearl harbour. The USA appears to have taken on what they thought were the little guys Germany and italy and then very bravely killed an estimated 140,000 people on august the 6th 1945 in a nuke attack on Japan. 


I don't think I said that the US was part of the war before Pearl Harbor.

My point was that the American public didn't want to get involved.  Our President at the time did, and took a lot of actions to that end.

For some information about the anti-war effort, here is a place to start:

America First Committee:

The America First Committee was the foremost pressure group against American entry into the Second World War.

The America First Committee launched a petition aimed at enforcing the 1939 Neutrality Act and forcing President Franklin D. Roosevelt to keep his pledge to keep America out of the war. They strongly distrusted Roosevelt, arguing that he was lying to the American people.

On the day after Franklin D. Roosevelt's lend-lease bill was submitted to Congress, Wood promised AFC opposition "with all the vigor it can exert." America First staunchly opposed the convoying of ships, the Atlantic Charter, and the placing of economic pressure on Japan. In order to achieve the defeat of lend-lease and the perpetuation of American neutrality, the AFC advocated four basic principles:

    * The United States must build an impregnable defense for America.
    * No foreign power, nor group of powers, can successfully attack a prepared America.
    * American democracy can be preserved only by keeping out of the European war.
    * "Aid short of war" weakens national defense at home and threatens to involve America in war abroad.

Despite the onset of war in Europe, an overwhelming majority of the American people wanted to stay out of the new war if they could.


United States  Non-interventionism:

The time between the World Wars saw a resurgence in non-interventionism in the United States. After the war broke out in Europe on September 1, 1939, such Americans as Charles Lindbergh, Gerald P. Nye and Rush D. Holt prominently advocated U.S. neutrality. Groups like the America First Committee tapped into the overwhelming desire of the American people to remain out of this second European war, attracting hundreds of thousands into its ranks.

***

Some of major things that Roosevelt did before the attack on Pearl Harbor included starting a peace time draft, giving aid in covert manner to you Brits before Lend-Lease, Lend-Lease itself, the formation and encouragement of American mecenary forces in Asia ... not to mention a lot of secret operations that are still coming to light.

Some resources:

Lend-Lease

Lend-Lease was the name of the program under which the United States of America supplied Great Britain, the Soviet Union, China, France and other Allied nations with vast amounts of war material (matériel) between 1941 and 1945. It began in March 1941, nine months before Pearl Harbor.
American Volunteer Group:

 The American Volunteer Group, a mercenary fighter unit that trained in Burma and China during the year prior to the American entry into World War II to fight against Japanese forces.

Secret War Against the Kriegsmarine:

Roosevelt saw Hitler and Nazism as a threat, and ordered the Navy into a secret war against the German Kriegsmarine in 1939.  American warships and sailors were fighting two years before Pearl Harbor, and they were shooting at Germans.  The sinking of the USS Reuben James in 1939 and other warships sunk or damaged could not be ignored.


So, I don't know where all your information comes from.  Information about history and world affairs from some members of this forum aren't always very accurate, nor very impartial.

As far as seeing it "cowardly" to save a million US lives with the dropping of the atomic bombs on Japan, I've already made my point on that.

FirmKY


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to missturbation)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: Threat to world peace??????? - 1/17/2007 3:51:56 PM   
missturbation


Posts: 8290
Joined: 2/12/2006
From: another planet
Status: offline
How about you answer my question i have now asked three or four times?
 
Would you care to state and prove how you were dragged into world war two?

_____________________________

What you don't witness with your eyes, don't witness with your mouth. Proverb.

If it fit's in a toaster, i can cook it.

Buying 10 item's or less is not shopping !!

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: Threat to world peace??????? - 1/17/2007 3:56:55 PM   
seeksfemslave


Posts: 4011
Joined: 6/16/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: missturbation

quote:

ORIGINAL: MzMia

Hell, great thread...I am reading the comments right now.
Nice to see the ladies starting political threads, some of us enjoy chatting
about OTHER things besides "relationships" "men" and "why the fuck
he did not call!"
I am not sure if Bush should be tried, but maybe he could just resign?
ha



well my politics arent good but i decided to get in on the men retiring to the drawing room with their whisky and cigars and trying to convince themselves they are masters of the universe.


You are welcome Miss T, especially if all you are wearing is that corset you mentioned some time ago.  ooooh I'm a sexist

(in reply to missturbation)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: Threat to world peace??????? - 1/17/2007 3:58:20 PM   
missturbation


Posts: 8290
Joined: 2/12/2006
From: another planet
Status: offline
As far as seeing it "cowardly" to save a million US lives with the dropping of the atomic bombs on Japan, I've already made my point on that.

333,000 japanese still suffering effects from the nuclear bombings.
Chances of getting cancer are higher.
Deformities in featuses due to the radiation still present.
More susceptible to Leukemia.
This is 50 years after the nuclear bombings and chances are there will be more casualties associated with them.
As far as i am concerned nuclear weapons are more cruel and inhumane than any other weapon as the web site i quoted stated. The continual affects over the years are abysmal.
 
Definition of cowardly - firing a nuclear weapon at a country which did not possess such technology and could not fight back.

 

< Message edited by missturbation -- 1/17/2007 4:05:38 PM >


_____________________________

What you don't witness with your eyes, don't witness with your mouth. Proverb.

If it fit's in a toaster, i can cook it.

Buying 10 item's or less is not shopping !!

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Threat to world peace??????? Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078